Yupu Liu1,2,3, Weijun Huang1,2,3, Jianyin Zou1,2,3, Huajun Xu1,2,3, Yingjun Qian4,5,6, Huaming Zhu1,2,3, Lili Meng1,2,3, Jian Guan1,2,3, Hongliang Yi7,8,9, Shankai Yin1,2,3. 1. Therapy Center of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. 2. Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. 3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China. 4. Therapy Center of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. qianyjmnn@163.com. 5. Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. qianyjmnn@163.com. 6. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China. qianyjmnn@163.com. 7. Therapy Center of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. yihongl@126.com. 8. Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. yihongl@126.com. 9. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China. yihongl@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a predictive model based on nocturnal minimal oxygen saturation (SpO2) alone can accurately detect the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a population with suspected OSA. METHODS: A total of 4297 participants with suspected OSA were enrolled in this study, and laboratory-based polysomnography (PSG) tests were performed at sea level in all subjects. Nocturnal minimal SpO2 was obtained automatically as part of the PSG test. Stratified sampling was used to divide the participants' data into the training set (75%) and the test set (25%). An OSA detection model based on minimal SpO2 alone was created using the training set data and its performance was evaluated using the independent test set data ("hold-out" evaluation). Gender-specific models, and models based on minimal SpO2 in combination with other predictive factors (age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, snoring grade, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and comorbidities), were also created and compared in terms of OSA detection performance. RESULTS: The prevalence of OSA was 85.6% in our study population. The models including multiple predictors, and the gender-specific models, failed to outperform the model based solely on minimal SpO2, which showed good predictive performance (C statistic, 0.922) having an overall accuracy rate of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.84, positive predictive value of 0.97, and positive likelihood ratio of 5.34. In addition, the model based on minimal SpO2 alone could also accurately predict the presence of moderate-to-severe OSA and severe OSA, with C statistics of 0.914 and 0.900, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model based on nocturnal minimal SpO2 alone may be an alternative option to detect the presence of OSA in a high-risk population when standard diagnostic tests are unavailable.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a predictive model based on nocturnal minimal oxygen saturation (SpO2) alone can accurately detect the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a population with suspected OSA. METHODS: A total of 4297 participants with suspected OSA were enrolled in this study, and laboratory-based polysomnography (PSG) tests were performed at sea level in all subjects. Nocturnal minimal SpO2 was obtained automatically as part of the PSG test. Stratified sampling was used to divide the participants' data into the training set (75%) and the test set (25%). An OSA detection model based on minimal SpO2 alone was created using the training set data and its performance was evaluated using the independent test set data ("hold-out" evaluation). Gender-specific models, and models based on minimal SpO2 in combination with other predictive factors (age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, snoring grade, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and comorbidities), were also created and compared in terms of OSA detection performance. RESULTS: The prevalence of OSA was 85.6% in our study population. The models including multiple predictors, and the gender-specific models, failed to outperform the model based solely on minimal SpO2, which showed good predictive performance (C statistic, 0.922) having an overall accuracy rate of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.84, positive predictive value of 0.97, and positive likelihood ratio of 5.34. In addition, the model based on minimal SpO2 alone could also accurately predict the presence of moderate-to-severe OSA and severe OSA, with C statistics of 0.914 and 0.900, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model based on nocturnal minimal SpO2 alone may be an alternative option to detect the presence of OSA in a high-risk population when standard diagnostic tests are unavailable.
Authors: Li-Li Peng; Jin-Rang Li; Jian-Jun Sun; Wu-Yi Li; Yu-Mei Sun; Rong Zhang; Lei-Lei Yu Journal: Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi Date: 2011-01
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Jon-Erik C Holty; Douglas K Owens; Paul Dallas; Melissa Starkey; Paul Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391