Martin Faschingbauer1, S Hacker2, A Seitz2, L Dürselen2, F Boettner3, H Reichel4. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. martin.faschingbauer@outlook.com. 2. Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstraße 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany. 3. Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Different alignment types for a better outcome after TKA were described. However, it is not clear how kinematic alignment influences knee joint kinematic. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether adapted tibial cuts in constitutional varus knees affect knee joint kinematics regarding femoral roll-back, varus/valgus angle, and femorotibial rotation. METHODS: Seven cadaveric knees with constitutional varus alignment were examined in the native state and after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR)-TKA with 0°, 3° and 6° tibia cuts using an established knee joint simulator. The effects of varus alignment on femorotibial rollback and rotation was determined. In addition, the native knee joint and different tibial cuts in CR-TKA were compared with Student's t test. RESULTS: Total knee replacement with a 3° and 6° varus tibia cut had the greatest varus deviation to the native knee (mean 1.6° ± 0.09°, respectively); while, knees with a 0° (mean 0.2° ± 0.01°) tibia cut were most similar to the constitutional varus knee joint. The femoral roll-back in the medial compartment was increased in the native knee (5.7-12.5 mm). A 6° varus cut had a restricted translation in the medial compartment (2-3.2 mm). In the lateral compartment, the extensive translation was observed with a 0° varus cut, followed by 3° and 6° and the native knee. All cuts showed significantly different mean values. Only the cuts at 3° and at 6° in the medial compartment and the cuts at 0° and at 3° in the lateral compartment did not differ significantly. In respect to tibiofemoral rotation, 0° and 3° varus cuts across all loads had the least difference to the native knee (3.4°), with a 0° varus cut showing a higher absolute internal rotation of the tibia than the native knee. Changes in knee kinematics of the tibiofemoral rotation showed significantly different mean values. CONCLUSION: The potentially improved outcome parameters in TKA with adapted tibia cuts in constitutional varus knees cannot be completely explained by the changes to knee kinematics. Mechanical alignment seems to result in more balanced load distribution and kinematics more closely resembling the native knee. From a kinematic point of view, it is not recommended to place the tibia in more than 3° of varus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical study.
PURPOSE: Different alignment types for a better outcome after TKA were described. However, it is not clear how kinematic alignment influences knee joint kinematic. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether adapted tibial cuts in constitutional varus knees affect knee joint kinematics regarding femoral roll-back, varus/valgus angle, and femorotibial rotation. METHODS: Seven cadaveric knees with constitutional varus alignment were examined in the native state and after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR)-TKA with 0°, 3° and 6° tibia cuts using an established knee joint simulator. The effects of varus alignment on femorotibial rollback and rotation was determined. In addition, the native knee joint and different tibial cuts in CR-TKA were compared with Student's t test. RESULTS: Total knee replacement with a 3° and 6° varus tibia cut had the greatest varus deviation to the native knee (mean 1.6° ± 0.09°, respectively); while, knees with a 0° (mean 0.2° ± 0.01°) tibia cut were most similar to the constitutional varus knee joint. The femoral roll-back in the medial compartment was increased in the native knee (5.7-12.5 mm). A 6° varus cut had a restricted translation in the medial compartment (2-3.2 mm). In the lateral compartment, the extensive translation was observed with a 0° varus cut, followed by 3° and 6° and the native knee. All cuts showed significantly different mean values. Only the cuts at 3° and at 6° in the medial compartment and the cuts at 0° and at 3° in the lateral compartment did not differ significantly. In respect to tibiofemoral rotation, 0° and 3° varus cuts across all loads had the least difference to the native knee (3.4°), with a 0° varus cut showing a higher absolute internal rotation of the tibia than the native knee. Changes in knee kinematics of the tibiofemoral rotation showed significantly different mean values. CONCLUSION: The potentially improved outcome parameters in TKA with adapted tibia cuts in constitutional varus knees cannot be completely explained by the changes to knee kinematics. Mechanical alignment seems to result in more balanced load distribution and kinematics more closely resembling the native knee. From a kinematic point of view, it is not recommended to place the tibia in more than 3° of varus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical study.
Authors: Sufian S Ahmad; Katharina Schürholz; Emanuel F Liechti; Michael T Hirschmann; Sandro Kohl; Frank M Klenke Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: H Gene Dossett; George J Swartz; Nicolette A Estrada; George W LeFevre; Bertram G Kwasman Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Carol A Mancuso; Allison Dunning; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Michael Alexiades; Charles Cornell; Thomas Sculco; Matthias Bostrom; David Mayman; Robert G Marx; Geoffrey Westrich; Michael O'Dell; Alvin I Mushlin Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 4.176