Literature DB >> 32305077

Blood transfusion strategies and ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic - Authors' reply.

Kollengode Ramanathan1, Graeme MacLaren2, Alain Combes3, Daniel Brodie4, Kiran Shekar5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32305077      PMCID: PMC7162630          DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30174-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


× No keyword cloud information.
We thank David Koeckerling and colleagues for their correspondence calling for restrictive blood transfusion strategies in response to our Health-care Development report on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) services for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The ideal transfusion trigger during ECMO support remains uncertain. Daily transfusion of the magnitude mentioned by Koeckerling and colleagues happens occasionally in patients receiving ECMO, but such requirements seldom happen in adult patients receiving venovenous ECMO managed in centres with robust transfusion protocols. The ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS (EOLIA) trial, the largest randomised controlled trial of patients receiving ECMO, adopted a conservative transfusion strategy (target haemoglobin level of 7–8 g/dL, increased to 10 g/dL if hypoxaemia persisted). Massive bleeding events (needing >10 units of transfusion) occurred in only 2% of patients needing ECMO. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization also advocates a restrictive approach, if possible. A recent global survey on transfusion requirements during venovenous ECMO, with more than 400 respondents from 42 countries, showed institutional variations in transfusion practices. Of note, the transfusion trigger was significantly lower in high-volume ECMO centres (>24 cases per year) because they followed protocol-based transfusion practices and accepted lower haemoglobin levels, as compared with low-volume centres (<12 cases per year). We believe that the majority of patients with COVID-19 who require ECMO could be treated with venovenous ECMO, and lower trigger thresholds (eg, 7 g/dL) would be tolerated if they are stable and not actively bleeding. ECMO for such patients should be offered in experienced centres in line with WHO guidelines. Higher thresholds (eg, 8–10 g/dL) could be considered in patients with shock or evidence of impaired oxygen delivery despite ECMO. Efforts to maintain physiological haemoglobin levels during ECMO should not be done routinely; transfusion protocols with lower triggers coupled with blood preservation strategies (eg, auto-transfusion of circuit blood during decannulation) should reduce blood transfusion in patients with COVID-19 needing ECMO support.
  4 in total

1.  Hemoglobin trigger and approach to red blood cell transfusions during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the international TRAIN-ECMO survey.

Authors:  Gennaro Martucci; Giacomo Grasselli; Kenichi Tanaka; Fabio Tuzzolino; Giovanna Panarello; Matthieu Schmidt; Giacomo Bellani; Antonio Arcadipane
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Alain Combes; David Hajage; Gilles Capellier; Alexandre Demoule; Sylvain Lavoué; Christophe Guervilly; Daniel Da Silva; Lara Zafrani; Patrice Tirot; Benoit Veber; Eric Maury; Bruno Levy; Yves Cohen; Christian Richard; Pierre Kalfon; Lila Bouadma; Hossein Mehdaoui; Gaëtan Beduneau; Guillaume Lebreton; Laurent Brochard; Niall D Ferguson; Eddy Fan; Arthur S Slutsky; Daniel Brodie; Alain Mercat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Blood conservation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Cara L Agerstrand; Kristin M Burkart; Darryl C Abrams; Matthew D Bacchetta; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Planning and provision of ECMO services for severe ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic and other outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  Kollengode Ramanathan; David Antognini; Alain Combes; Matthew Paden; Bishoy Zakhary; Mark Ogino; Graeme MacLaren; Daniel Brodie; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 pandemic and transfusion medicine: the worldwide challenge and its implications.

Authors:  Layal Al Mahmasani; Mohammad Hassan Hodroj; Antoine Finianos; Ali Taher
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 2.  COVID-19 in early 2021: current status and looking forward.

Authors:  Chengdi Wang; Zhoufeng Wang; Guangyu Wang; Johnson Yiu-Nam Lau; Kang Zhang; Weimin Li
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-03-08

Review 3.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19: A scoping review.

Authors:  Massimiliano Polastri; Justyna Swol; Antonio Loforte; Andrea Dell'Amore
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 2.663

4.  The impact of reduction in intensity of mechanical ventilation upon venovenous ECMO initiation on radiographically assessed lung edema scores: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Elliott T Worku; Francis Yeung; Chris Anstey; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20

5.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients: outcome and time-course of clinical and biological parameters.

Authors:  Pierre Huette; Christophe Beyls; Mathieu Guilbart; Alexandre Coquet; Pascal Berna; Guillaume Haye; Pierre-Alexandre Roger; Patricia Besserve; Michael Bernasinski; Hervé Dupont; Osama Abou-Arab; Yazine Mahjoub
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.713

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.