Yang Li1, Jie Wang2, Yiqi Yu1, Chao Qiu1, Zhonghua Li2, Qi Ling3, Guocui Zhang3, Li Li3, Yinhua Gong2, Qing Lu2, Lifeng Cao2, Ting Gu2, Xin Wang2, Miaoqu Zhang1, Qiran Zhang1, Hanyue Zhang1, Bin Xu1, Lingyun Shao1, Yonglan Pu2, Wenhong Zhang1,4,5. 1. Department of Infectious Disease, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Infectious Disease, Taicang Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Suzhou, China. 3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Taicang Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Suzhou, China. 4. National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan Univeristy, Shanghai, China. 5. State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology (MOE/MOH) and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Effectiveness of maternal antiviral prophylaxis in mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been extensively explored in studies where standard immunoprophylaxis is well secured to the newborns. This real-world study aims to test if maternal antiviral prophylaxis can safeguard the newborn when immunoprophylaxis administration was delayed or missed. METHODS: Hepatitis B surface antigen-positive pregnant women were categorized into mothers with HBV DNA levels ≥2 × 105 IU/mL receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue during the third trimester; mothers with HBV DNA levels ≥2 × 105 IU/mL without antiviral treatment; and those with HBV DNA levels <2 × 105 IU/mL without antiviral treatment. The immunoprophylaxis procedure was collected and verified by the delivery medical document and logbook of biological product usage. The primary end point was the rate of chronic HBV infection (CHB) in infants. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2017, 251 mother-child pairs were enrolled. Among 187 infants of mothers with HBV DNA levels ≥2 × 105 IU/mL, none developed CHB when mothers received antiviral treatment, as compared to 13.0% (10/77) of infants born to untreated mothers (P < .001). None of the infants of mothers with HBV DNA levels <2 × 105 IU/mL were infected. Stratified by the time of immunoprophylaxis administration after birth, maternal antiviral prophylaxis predominately benefited infants who failed to receive immunoprophylaxis within 24 hours (100% [6/6] vs 0% [0/2], P = .036) and those who received delayed immunoprophylaxis between 2 and 24 hours (18.8% [3/16] vs 0% [0/32], P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral prophylaxis in high viraemic mothers is effective in contingencies of missed or delayed neonatal immunoprophylaxis.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Effectiveness of maternal antiviral prophylaxis in mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been extensively explored in studies where standard immunoprophylaxis is well secured to the newborns. This real-world study aims to test if maternal antiviral prophylaxis can safeguard the newborn when immunoprophylaxis administration was delayed or missed. METHODS:Hepatitis B surface antigen-positive pregnant women were categorized into mothers with HBV DNA levels ≥2 × 105 IU/mL receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue during the third trimester; mothers with HBV DNA levels ≥2 × 105 IU/mL without antiviral treatment; and those with HBV DNA levels <2 × 105 IU/mL without antiviral treatment. The immunoprophylaxis procedure was collected and verified by the delivery medical document and logbook of biological product usage. The primary end point was the rate of chronic HBV infection (CHB) in infants. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2017, 251 mother-child pairs were enrolled. Among 187 infants of mothers with HBV DNA levels ≥2 × 105 IU/mL, none developed CHB when mothers received antiviral treatment, as compared to 13.0% (10/77) of infants born to untreated mothers (P < .001). None of the infants of mothers with HBV DNA levels <2 × 105 IU/mL were infected. Stratified by the time of immunoprophylaxis administration after birth, maternal antiviral prophylaxis predominately benefited infants who failed to receive immunoprophylaxis within 24 hours (100% [6/6] vs 0% [0/2], P = .036) and those who received delayed immunoprophylaxis between 2 and 24 hours (18.8% [3/16] vs 0% [0/32], P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral prophylaxis in high viraemic mothers is effective in contingencies of missed or delayed neonatal immunoprophylaxis.