Sebastian Röhrich1, Thomas Schlegl2, Constanze Bardach1, Helmut Prosch3, Georg Langs4. 1. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Contextflow GmbH, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. helmut.prosch@meduniwien.ac.at. 4. Computational Imaging Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Automatically detecting and quantifying pneumothorax on chest computed tomography (CT) may impact clinical decision-making. Machine learning methods published so far struggle with the heterogeneity of technical parameters and the presence of additional pathologies, highlighting the importance of stable algorithms. METHODS: A deep residual UNet was developed and evaluated for automated, volume-level pneumothorax grading (i.e., labelling a volume whether a pneumothorax was present or not), and pixel-level classification (i.e., segmentation and quantification of pneumothorax), on a retrospective series of routine chest CT data. Ground truth annotations were provided by radiologists. The fully automated pixel-level pneumothorax segmentation method was trained using 43 chest CT scans and evaluated on 9 chest CT scans with pixel-level annotation basis and 567 chest CT scans on a volume-level basis. RESULTS: This method achieved a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, an average precision of 0.97, and a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.94. This segmentation performance resulted to be similar to the inter-rater segmentation accuracy of two radiologists, who achieved a DSC of 0.92. The comparison of manual and automated pneumothorax quantification yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.996. The volume-level pneumothorax grading accuracy was evaluated on 567 chest CT scans and yielded an AUC of 0.98 and an average precision of 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a deep learning method for the detection and quantification of pneumothorax in heterogeneous routine clinical data that may facilitate the automated triage of urgent examinations and enable treatment decision support.
BACKGROUND: Automatically detecting and quantifying pneumothorax on chest computed tomography (CT) may impact clinical decision-making. Machine learning methods published so far struggle with the heterogeneity of technical parameters and the presence of additional pathologies, highlighting the importance of stable algorithms. METHODS: A deep residual UNet was developed and evaluated for automated, volume-level pneumothorax grading (i.e., labelling a volume whether a pneumothorax was present or not), and pixel-level classification (i.e., segmentation and quantification of pneumothorax), on a retrospective series of routine chest CT data. Ground truth annotations were provided by radiologists. The fully automated pixel-level pneumothorax segmentation method was trained using 43 chest CT scans and evaluated on 9 chest CT scans with pixel-level annotation basis and 567 chest CT scans on a volume-level basis. RESULTS: This method achieved a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, an average precision of 0.97, and a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.94. This segmentation performance resulted to be similar to the inter-rater segmentation accuracy of two radiologists, who achieved a DSC of 0.92. The comparison of manual and automated pneumothorax quantification yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.996. The volume-level pneumothorax grading accuracy was evaluated on 567 chest CT scans and yielded an AUC of 0.98 and an average precision of 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a deep learning method for the detection and quantification of pneumothorax in heterogeneous routine clinical data that may facilitate the automated triage of urgent examinations and enable treatment decision support.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep learning; Pneumothorax; Thorax; Tomography (x-ray computed); Triage
Authors: Iris Q Grunwald; Johann Kulikovski; Wolfgang Reith; Stephen Gerry; Rafael Namias; Maria Politi; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Marco Essig; Shrey Mathur; Olivier Joly; Khawar Hussain; Viola Wagner; Sweni Shah; George Harston; Julija Vlahovic; Silke Walter; Anna Podlasek; Klaus Fassbender Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Lucia J M Kroft; Levinia van der Velden; Irene Hernández Girón; Joost J H Roelofs; Albert de Roos; Jacob Geleijns Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: R H H M Philipsen; C I Sánchez; P Maduskar; J Melendez; L Peters-Bax; J G Peter; R Dawson; G Theron; K Dheda; B van Ginneken Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 4.379