Literature DB >> 32303594

The equity impact of a universal child health promotion programme.

Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström1, Marie Lindkvist1, Eva Eurenius1, Jenny Häggström2, Anneli Ivarsson1, Filipa Sampaio3, Inna Feldman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-world evaluations of complex interventions are scarce. We evaluated the effect of the Salut Programme, a universal child health promotion intervention in northern Sweden, on income-related inequalities in positive birth outcomes and healthcare utilisation up to 2 years after delivery.
METHODS: Using the mother's place of residence at delivery, the child and the mother were classified as belonging to either the control area (received care-as-usual) or the intervention area (where the intervention was implemented from 2006) and either the premeasure (children born between 2002 and 2004) or the postmeasure (children born between 2006 and 2008) period. Parents' earned income was used as the socioeconomic ranking variable. The Relative Concentration Index was computed for six binary birth outcome indicators and for inpatient and day patient care for children and their mothers. Changes in inequality over time were compared using a difference-in-difference approach.
RESULTS: Income-related inequalities in birth outcomes and child healthcare utilisation were absent, except that full-term pregnancies were concentrated among the poor at premeasure in the intervention area. In contrast, mothers' healthcare utilisation was significantly pro-poor in the control area. The extent of inequality changed differentially between premeasure and postmeasure for two birth outcomes: full-term pregnancies and infants with normal birth weight. Inequalities in healthcare utilisation did not change significantly in either area over time.
CONCLUSION: In northern Sweden, income-related inequalities in birth outcomes and child healthcare utilisation are largely absent. However, relative inequalities in mothers' healthcare utilisation are large. We found no evidence that the Salut Programme affected changes in inequality over time. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health promotion; income; pregnancy outcome; public health; registries

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32303594      PMCID: PMC7337232          DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  24 in total

1.  Maternal and paternal self-rated health and BMI in relation to lifestyle in early pregnancy: the Salut Programme in Sweden.

Authors:  Eva Eurenius; Marie Lindkvist; Magdalena Sundqvist; Anneli Ivarsson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  On the measurement of inequalities in health.

Authors:  A Wagstaff; P Paci; E van Doorslaer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Reply to Guido Erreygers and Tom Van Ourti's comment on 'The concentration index of a binary outcome revisited'.

Authors:  Adam Wagstaff
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Are poor living conditions in childhood and adolescence an important risk factor for arteriosclerotic heart disease?

Authors:  A Forsdahl
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1977-06

5.  Early-life income inequality and adolescent health and well-being.

Authors:  Frank J Elgar; Geneviève Gariépy; Torbjørn Torsheim; Candace Currie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Using concentration index to study changes in socio-economic inequality of overweight among US adolescents between 1971 and 2002.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? A register-based retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jenny Häggström; Filipa Sampaio; Eva Eurenius; Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström; Anneli Ivarsson; Marie Lindkvist; Inna Feldman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Multiple inequity in health care: An example from Brazil.

Authors:  Estela Capelas Barbosa; Richard Cookson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review.

Authors:  S Thomas; D Fayter; K Misso; D Ogilvie; M Petticrew; A Sowden; M Whitehead; G Worthy
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Salut Programme: a universal health promotion intervention for parents and children-protocol of a register-based retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Inna Feldman; Eva Eurenius; Jenny Häggström; Filipa Sampaio; Marie Lindkvist; Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström; Anneli Ivarsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.