Literature DB >> 32303534

Objectively-Measured Light-Intensity Physical Activity and Risk of Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Shanhu Qiu1,2, Xue Cai3, Tongzhi Wu1,4, Zilin Sun5, Haijian Guo6, Johannes Kirsten2, Janine Wendt2, Jürgen Michael Steinacker2, Uwe Schumann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of light-intensity physical activity (LPA) in preventing cancer mortality has been questioned. To address this concern, the present meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between objectively-measured LPA and risk of cancer mortality.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus to January 2020. Prospective cohort studies reporting the association between objectively-measured LPA using activity monitors (e.g., accelerometers) and risk of cancer mortality in the general population were included. The summary hazard ratios (HR) per 30 min/day of LPA and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using a random-effects model. Dose-response analysis was used to plot their relationship.
RESULTS: Five prospective cohort studies were included, in which the definition of LPA based on accelerometer readings was mainly set within 100 to 2,100 counts/min. The summary HR for cancer mortality per 30 min/day of LPA was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.95; I 2 < 1%), and the association between LPA and risk reduction in cancer mortality was linearly shaped (P nonlinearity = 0.72). LPA exhibited a comparable magnitude of risk reduction in cancer mortality of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity regardless of equal time-length (0.87 per 30 min/day vs. 0.94 per 30 min/day, P interaction = 0.46) or equal amount (0.74 vs. 0.94 per 150 metabolic equivalents-min/day, P interaction = 0.11). Furthermore, replacing sedentary time by LPA of 30 min/day decreased the risk of cancer mortality by 9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Objectively-measured LPA conferred benefits in decreasing the risk of cancer mortality. IMPACT: LPA should be considered in physical activity guidelines to decrease the risk of cancer mortality. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32303534     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  Cross-sectional and prospective associations between active living environments and accelerometer-assessed physical activity in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort.

Authors:  Samantha Hajna; Soren Brage; Alice Dalton; Simon J Griffin; Andy P Jones; Kay-Tee Khaw; Robert Luben; Nicholas J Wareham; Jenna Panter
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Changes in Physical Fitness during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown among Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Xiangyu Zhai; Na Wu; Sakura Koriyama; Dong Wang; Yuhui Jin; Weifeng Li; Susumu S Sawada; Xiang Fan
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Leisure-time physical activity and risk of depression: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  ZhiGuang Guo; Rui Li; Songtao Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Relative reinforcement from physical activity in real-world environments: a novel application of behavioral economics.

Authors:  Ricarda K Foxx; Danielle E Jake-Schoffman; Anne E Mathews; JeeWon Cheong; Ali M Yurasek
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-09-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.