Nicholas J Cecchi1, Derek C Monroe2, Jenna J Phreaner1, Steven L Small3, James W Hicks1. 1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Irvine, United States. 2. Department of Neurology, University of California-Irvine, United States. Electronic address: dcmonroe@uci.edu. 3. Department of Neurology, University of California-Irvine, United States; School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent reports have demonstrated a risk of concussion and subconcussive head impacts in collegiate varsity and international elite water polo. We sought to characterize patterns of head impact exposure at the collegiate club level of water polo. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Head impact sensors (SIM-G, Triax Technologies) were worn by men's (n=16) and women's (n=15) collegiate club water polo players during 11 games. Peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak rotational acceleration (PRA) of head impacts were recorded by the sensors. Two streams of competition video were used to verify and describe the nature of head impacts. RESULTS: Men's players sustained 52 verified head impacts of magnitude 39.7±16.3g PLA and 5.2±3.2 krad/s2 PRA, and women's players sustained 43 verified head impacts of magnitude 33.7±12.6g PLA and 4.0±2.8krad/s2 PRA. Impacts sustained by men had greater PLA than those sustained by women (p=.045). Athletes were impacted most frequently at the offensive center position, to the back of the head, and by an opponent's torso or limb. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort of male and female athletes sustained relatively infrequent head impacts during water polo competitions played at the collegiate club level. The amount of head impact exposure in our cohort was dependent on player position, with offensive centers prone to sustaining the most impacts. Head impact sensors are subject to large amounts of false positives and should be used in conjunction with video recordings to verify the validity of impact data.
OBJECTIVES: Recent reports have demonstrated a risk of concussion and subconcussive head impacts in collegiate varsity and international elite water polo. We sought to characterize patterns of head impact exposure at the collegiate club level of water polo. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Head impact sensors (SIM-G, Triax Technologies) were worn by men's (n=16) and women's (n=15) collegiate club water polo players during 11 games. Peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak rotational acceleration (PRA) of head impacts were recorded by the sensors. Two streams of competition video were used to verify and describe the nature of head impacts. RESULTS:Men's players sustained 52 verified head impacts of magnitude 39.7±16.3g PLA and 5.2±3.2 krad/s2 PRA, and women's players sustained 43 verified head impacts of magnitude 33.7±12.6g PLA and 4.0±2.8krad/s2 PRA. Impacts sustained by men had greater PLA than those sustained by women (p=.045). Athletes were impacted most frequently at the offensive center position, to the back of the head, and by an opponent's torso or limb. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort of male and female athletes sustained relatively infrequent head impacts during water polo competitions played at the collegiate club level. The amount of head impact exposure in our cohort was dependent on player position, with offensive centers prone to sustaining the most impacts. Head impact sensors are subject to large amounts of false positives and should be used in conjunction with video recordings to verify the validity of impact data.
Authors: Emily McCuen; Diana Svaldi; Katherine Breedlove; Nicole Kraz; Brian Cummiskey; Evan L Breedlove; Jessica Traver; Katherine F Desmond; Robert E Hannemann; Erica Zanath; Alexandra Guerra; Larry Leverenz; Thomas M Talavage; Eric A Nauman Journal: J Biomech Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Lindley L Brainard; Jonathan G Beckwith; Jeffrey J Chu; Joseph J Crisco; Thomas W McAllister; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Arthur C Maerlender; Richard M Greenwald Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Lynda Mainwaring; Kaleigh M Ferdinand Pennock; Sandhya Mylabathula; Benjamin Z Alavie Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Joseph J Crisco; Bethany J Wilcox; Jonathan G Beckwith; Jeffrey J Chu; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Steven Rowson; Stefan M Duma; Arthur C Maerlender; Thomas W McAllister; Richard M Greenwald Journal: J Biomech Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Nelson Cortes; Andrew E Lincoln; Gregory D Myer; Lisa Hepburn; Michael Higgins; Margot Putukian; Shane V Caswell Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Bethany J Wilcox; Jonathan G Beckwith; Richard M Greenwald; Jeffrey J Chu; Thomas W McAllister; Laura A Flashman; Arthur C Maerlender; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Joseph J Crisco Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Geoff Manley; Andrew J Gardner; Kathryn J Schneider; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Julian Bailes; Robert C Cantu; Rudolph J Castellani; Michael Turner; Barry D Jordan; Christopher Randolph; Jiří Dvořák; K Alix Hayden; Charles H Tator; Paul McCrory; Grant L Iverson Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Calvin Kuo; Declan Patton; Tyler Rooks; Gregory Tierney; Andrew McIntosh; Robert Lynall; Amanda Esquivel; Ray Daniel; Thomas Kaminski; Jason Mihalik; Nate Dau; Jillian Urban Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Derek C Monroe; Elizabeth A Thomas; Nicholas J Cecchi; Douglas A Granger; James W Hicks; Steven L Small Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.379