Literature DB >> 32303379

Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.

François Demumieux1, Pierre-Olivier Ludes1, Pierre Diemunsch2, Elliott Bennett-Guerrero3, Marko Lujic1, François Lefebvre4, Eric Noll5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of recovery is an important component of perioperative health status. The 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale is a validated multidimensional questionnaire that measures postoperative quality of recovery. The aim of this study was to translate and assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the QoR-15 scale (QoR-15F) to measure postoperative recovery in French-speaking patients.
METHODS: After translation into French of the original English version of the QoR-15 scale, psychometric validation of the QoR-15F scale to measure postoperative quality of recovery was performed. This psychometric validation included validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility. The QoR-15F scale was administered before operation and on Postoperative day 1 in French-speaking patients. Patient-perceived global recovery assessment was measured at Postoperative day 1 using a VAS.
RESULTS: We enrolled 150 patients, and 144 completed the study protocol. The completion rate of administered questionnaires was 100%. Pearson (r) correlation between postoperative QoR-15F and the global recovery assessment by the patient was 0.60 (P<0.0001). As expected, there was a significant negative correlation between QoR-15F score and duration of surgery (r=-0.29; P<0.01), duration of PACU stay (r=-0.21; P=0.01), and duration of hospital stay (r=-0.34; P<0.01). Cronbach's alpha was 0.81, split-half alpha was 0.83, and the global test-retest intra-class coefficient was 0.98 (0.95-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: The QoR-15F is a valid and reliable tool to measure postoperative quality of recovery in French-speaking patients. The psychometric properties to measure postoperative quality of recovery were similar to the seminal English version. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03578068.
Copyright © 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient safety; patient-reported measures; perioperative medicine; postoperative outcomes; quality of recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32303379     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

1.  Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Enhances the Quality of Recovery after Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Qing-Ren Liu; Yu-Chen Dai; Jue Xie; Xiang Li; Xing-Bing Sun; Jie Sun
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.667

2.  Comparing propofol anaesthesia guided by Bispectral Index monitoring and frontal EEG wave analysis with standard monitoring in laparoscopic surgery: protocol for the 'EEG in General Anaesthesia - More Than Only a Bispectral Index' Trial, a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Bettina U Gruber; Valerie Girsberger; Lukas Kusstatscher; Simon Funk; Anita Luethy; Lien Jakus; Julien Maillard; Luzius A Steiner; Salome Dell-Kuster; Christoph S Burkhart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.

Authors:  Johannes C N de Vlieger; Willem H Luiting; Jessica Lockyer; Peter Meyer; Joke Fleer; Robbert Sanderman; J K Götz Wietasch
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.376

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.