Literature DB >> 32303255

VENTILatOry strategies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: the VENTILO Survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Edoardo Picetti1, Paolo Pelosi2,3, Fabio Silvio Taccone4, Giuseppe Citerio5, Jordi Mancebo6, Chiara Robba2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients often develop acute respiratory failure. Optimal ventilator strategies in this setting are not well established. We performed an international survey to investigate the practice in the ventilatory management of TBI patients with and without respiratory failure.
METHODS: An electronic questionnaire, including 38 items and 3 different clinical scenarios [arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) > 300 (scenario 1), 150-300 (scenario 2), < 150 (scenario 3)], was available on the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) website between November 2018 and March 2019. The survey was endorsed by ESICM.
RESULTS: There were 687 respondents [472 (69%) from Europe], mainly intensivists [328 (48%)] and anesthesiologists [206 (30%)]. A standard protocol for mechanical ventilation in TBI patients was utilized by 277 (40%) respondents and a specific weaning protocol by 198 (30%). The most common tidal volume (TV) applied was 6-8 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) in scenarios 1-2 (72% PaO2/FIO2 > 300 and 61% PaO2/FiO2 150-300) and 4-6 ml/kg/PBW in scenario 3 (53% PaO2/FiO2 < 150). The most common level of highest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) used was 15 cmH2O in patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 without intracranial hypertension (41% if PaO2/FiO2 150-300 and 50% if PaO2/FiO2 < 150) and 10 cmH2O in patients with intracranial hypertension (32% if PaO2/FiO2 150-300 and 33% if PaO2/FiO2 < 150). Regardless of the presence of intracranial hypertension, the most common carbon dioxide target remained 36-40 mmHg whereas the most common PaO2 target was 81-100 mmHg in all the 3 scenarios. The most frequent rescue strategies utilized in case of refractory respiratory failure despite conventional ventilator settings were neuromuscular blocking agents [406 (88%)], recruitment manoeuvres [319 (69%)] and prone position [292 (63%)].
CONCLUSIONS: Ventilatory management, targets and practice of adult severe TBI patients with and without respiratory failure are widely different among centres. These findings may be helpful to define future investigations in this topic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical ventilation; Respiratory failure; Traumatic brain injury

Year:  2020        PMID: 32303255     DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02875-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  7 in total

1.  The mechanical power in neurocritical care patients: is it useful?

Authors:  D Chiumello; S Coppola
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 2.  Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Is it so Different?

Authors:  Shaurya Taran; Sung-Min Cho; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.532

3.  The Connection Between Selected Caspases Levels in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid and Severity After Brain Injury.

Authors:  Dorota Siwicka-Gieroba; Sylwia Terpilowska; Chiara Robba; Małgorzata Barud; Agnieszka Kubik-Komar; Wojciech Dabrowski
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Early effects of ventilatory rescue therapies on systemic and cerebral oxygenation in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ball; Denise Battaglini; Chiara Robba; Danilo Cardim; Emanuela Moncalvo; Iole Brunetti; Matteo Bassetti; Daniele R Giacobbe; Antonio Vena; Nicolò Patroniti; Patricia R M Rocco; Basil F Matta; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  The prone position must accommodate changes in IAP in traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Wojciech Dabrowski; Dorota Siwicka-Gieroba; Chiara Robba; Rafael Badenes; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Brain-lung interactions and mechanical ventilation in patients with isolated brain injury.

Authors:  Mairi Ziaka; Aristomenis Exadaktylos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Pathophysiology of Brain Injury and Neurological Outcome in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Preclinical to Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Merry Huang; Aron Gedansky; Catherine E Hassett; Carrie Price; Tracey H Fan; R Scott Stephens; Paul Nyquist; Ken Uchino; Sung-Min Cho
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.210

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.