Literature DB >> 32303241

The French paediatric cohort of Castleman disease: a retrospective report of 23 patients.

Charlotte Borocco1, Claire Ballot-Schmit2, Oanez Ackermann3, Nathalie Aladjidi4, Jeremie Delaleu5, Vannina Giacobbi-Milet6, Sarah Jannier7, Eric Jeziorski8, François Maurier9, Yves Perel4, Christophe Piguet10, Eric Oksenhendler11,12, Isabelle Koné-Paut1, Caroline Galeotti13,14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Castleman disease (CD) is a rare non-malignant lymphoproliferation of undetermined origin. Two major disease phenotypes can be distinguished: unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD). Diagnosis confirmation is based on histopathological findings in a lymph node. We attempted to survey all cases of paediatric CD identified to date in France to set up a national registry aiming to improve CD early recognition, treatment and follow-up, within the context of a new national reference center (http://www.castleman.fr).
METHODS: In 2016, we e-mailed a questionnaire to members of the French paediatric immunohaematology society, the paediatric rheumatology society and the Reference Centre for Castleman Disease to retrospectively collect cases of paediatric CD (first symptoms before age 18 years). Anatomopathological confirmation was mandatory.
RESULTS: We identified 23 patients (12 girls) with a diagnosis of UCD (n = 17) and MCD (n = 6) between 1994 and 2018. The mean age at first symptoms was 11.47 ± 4.23 years for UCD and 8.3 ± 3.4 years for MCD. The mean diagnosis delay was 8.16 ± 10.32 months for UCD and 5.16 ± 5.81 years for MCD. In UCD, the initial symptoms were isolated lymph nodes (n = 10) or lymph node associated with other symptoms (n = 7); fever was present in 3 patients. Five patients with MCD presented fever. No patients had HIV or human herpesvirus 8 infection. Autoinflammatory gene mutations were investigated in five patients. One patient with MCD carried a K695R heterozygous mutation in MEFV, another patient with MCD and Duchenne myopathy carried two variants in TNFRSF1A and one patient with UCD and fever episodes carried two heterozygous mutations, in IL10RA and IL36RN, respectively. Treatment of UCD was mainly surgical resection, steroids, and radiotherapy. Treatment of MCD included tocilizumab, rituximab, anakinra, steroids, chemotherapy, and splenectomy. Overall survival after a mean of 6.1 ± 6.4 years of follow-up, was 100% for both forms.
CONCLUSION: Paediatric CD still seems underdiagnosed, with a significant diagnosis delay, especially for MCD, but new international criteria will help in the future. Unlike adult CD, which is strongly associated with HIV and human herpesvirus 8 infection, paediatric CD could be favored by primary activation of innate immunity and may affect life expectancy less.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multicentric; Paediatric Castleman disease; Tocilizumab; Unicentric

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32303241      PMCID: PMC7164260          DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-1345-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis        ISSN: 1750-1172            Impact factor:   4.123


Introduction

Castleman disease (CD) or angio-follicular hyperplasia is a rare non-malignant lymphoproliferation of undetermined origin. CD diagnosis is difficult and often delayed because of insidious onset, low awareness and clinical heterogeneity. Two major disease phenotypes can be distinguished: unicentric CD (UCD), with involved lymph node(s) affecting a single station, and multicentric CD (MCD), with multiple lymph nodes and frequent inflammatory systemic symptoms [1]. The UCD phenotype is the most frequently reported in children and has the most favourable outcome [2]. Diagnosis confirmation is based on histopathological findings in an involved lymph node. The hyaline vascular (HV) type is characterized by abnormal germinal centres penetrated by hyalinised vessels and associated with abnormal follicular dendritic cells. The plasma cell variant (PCV) shows normal or enlarged germinal centres associated with interfollicular plasma cell infiltration. Symptomatic CD is often associated with increased production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) [3]. CD is also classified according to the presence or absence of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8); the association is clearly established in immune-compromised adults, the most frequent cause being HIV infection. We attempted to survey all cases of paediatric CD identified to date in France to set up a national registry aiming to improve CD early recognition, treatment and follow-up, within the context of a new reference centre (http://www.castleman.fr).

Methods

In 2016, we e-mailed a questionnaire to members of the French paediatric immunohaematology society, the French paediatric rheumatology society and the French Reference Centre for Castleman Disease to retrospectively collect information from medical charts of patients with paediatric CD (see Additional file 1). We included all patients with a diagnosis of UCD or MCD who presented the first symptoms before age 18 years. Patients were required to have a diagnosis based on the pathological analysis of a lymph node biopsy of an affected area with the specific pathological criteria that we described previously. Collected information included patient’s demographic information, age at first symptoms, age at diagnosis, clinical, biological and pathological findings, immunological profile with HHV-8 and HIV infection status, treatment strategy, clinical outcome and the speciality of the physicians involved. To better assess the burden and duration of the diagnostic delay, all other diagnostic procedures were reviewed (biopsies, CT scan, ultrasonography, PET scan, MRI, cytological puncture, myelography, endoscopy). Genetic screening involved Sanger analysis for familial Mediterranean fever (MEFV) gene and/or by next-generation sequencing of a panel of 62 autoinflammatory disease genes (see Additional file 2). According to French national regulations, no institutional review board approval was required for this retrospective study. Cohort characteristics and other variables were analyzed with descriptive statistics (mean ± SD, number [%], range) and the Fisher exact test.

Results

We identified 23 patients (12 girls) with a diagnosis of UCD (n = 17) and MCD (n = 6) between 1994 and 2018 (Table 1). The patients were seen in 14 centres and the diagnosis was established by paediatric haematologists (n = 9), adult immunologists (n = 6), paediatric rheumatologists (n = 6), a paediatric hepatologist (n = 1), an ENT specialist (n = 1), or a dermatologist (n = 1). Three cases were previously published [4-6].
Table 1

General clinical, laboratory and treatments characteristics of the paediatric cohort of unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD)

UCD (n=17)MCD (n=6)
mean±SD (range) or n (%)mean±SD (range) or n (%)
Sex ratio (F:M)9/83/3
Age at first symptoms (years)11.47 ± 4.23 (0.25-16.5)8.3 ± 3.4 (2.8-13)
Diagnosis delay (year)0.68 ± 0.86 (0-3)5.16 ± 5.81 (0-17)
Pathological type
 HV13 (76.5%)0 (0%)
 PCV3 (17.6%)2 (33.3%)
 Mixed type0 (0%)3 (50%)
 No data1 (5.9%)1 (16.6%)
At diagnosis
 Fever3 (17.6%)5 (83.3%)
 CRP level, mg/L23.4 ± 42.07 (0.5-150)50.68 ± 26.96 (7.1-96)
 Hb level, g/dL12.53 ± 2.52 (7.1-15.7)10.23 ± 1.68 (8.8-13.6)
 Platelet count, x109/mm3334.19 ± 151.34 (115-791)319.17 ± 164.32 (141-665)
 IgG level, g/L12.8 ± 6.96 (6.9-29.7)21.48 ± 7.69 (15-36)
 HIV serology0 (0%)0 (0%)
 HHV8 (serology, PCR or immunostaining)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Treatment
 Surgical excision12 (70.6%)0 (0%)
 Radiotherapy1 (5.9%)0 (0%)
 Chemotherapy0 (0%)1 (16.7%)
 Tocilizumab2 (11.8%)5 (83.3%)
 Anakinra2 (11.8%)1 (16.7%)
 Steroïds4 (23.5%)3 (50%)
 Splenectomy0 (0%)1 (16.7%)
 No treatment3 (17.6%)0 (0%)
 IgIV1 (5.9%)0 (0%)

CD Castleman disease, F female, M male, HV hyaline vascular, PCV plasma cell variant, Hb haemoglobin, IgG immunoglobulin G, IgIV intravenous immunoglobulin, CRP C-reactive protein, HHV-8 human herpesvirus 8, SD standard deviation

General clinical, laboratory and treatments characteristics of the paediatric cohort of unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD) CD Castleman disease, F female, M male, HV hyaline vascular, PCV plasma cell variant, Hb haemoglobin, IgG immunoglobulin G, IgIV intravenous immunoglobulin, CRP C-reactive protein, HHV-8 human herpesvirus 8, SD standard deviation For UCD patients, the mean age at first symptoms was 11.47 ± 4.23 years (range 0.25–16.5) and the mean diagnosis delay was 8.16 ± 10.32 months (range 0–36). The initial symptoms were isolated lymph nodes (10/17; 58.8%) or lymph node associated with other symptoms (7/17; 41.2%), and fever was present in only 3/17 (17.6%) patients (Table 2). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level was increased (> 10 mg/l) in 4/16 (25%) patients; the mean CRP level was 23.4 ± 42.07 mg/l (range 0.5–150). Elevated IgG level was observed in 4/12 (33%) patients; the mean IgG level was 12.8 ± 6.96 g/l (range 6.9–29.7). Mean haemoglobin level was 12.53 ± 2.52 g/dl (range 7.1–15.7) (16/17 patients) and mean platelet count 334.19 ± 151.34 × 109/mm3 (range 115–791). Diagnostic investigations were lymph node biopsy (16/17; 94%), CT scan (13/17; 76.5%), ultrasonography (10/17; 58.8%), PET scan (7/17; 41.2%), lymph node cytological puncture (4/17; 23.5%), MRI (3/17; 17.6%), myelography (1/17; 5.9%), and upper and lower digestive endoscopy with digestive biopsies (1/17; 5.9%). The most frequent histologic finding on lymph node biopsy was the HV type (n = 13/17; 76.5%), then the mixed type (3/17; 17.6%). CD adenopathy was in the cervical area in 11/17 (64.7%) patients, intrathoracic in 4/17 (23.5%), and intraperitoneal in 2/17 (11.8%) (Fig. 1a).
Table 2

Clinical and laboratory features of 17 patients with UCD

Patient/SexAge at first symptoms (year)Initial symptomsHb g/dlplatelets x109/LIgG g/lCRP mg/lESR mm/hDiagnosis delay (year)Diagnostic investigationsLymph node localizationPathological typeTreatmentsFollow-up time (year)EvolutionGenetic variant
P1 / M0.25Cervical lymph node11.93718.12--0.9Ultrasonography, CT scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVTocilizumab, steroids, anakinra, surgical excision1.5No relapseND
P2 / F14Right cervical lymph node13246-<4100.5CT scan, PET scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSurgical excision1.5No relapseND
P3 / F10Left cervical lymph node12.8304-642.5Ultrasonography, CT scan, lymph node cytopunction, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSurgical excision7No relapseND
P4 / M16.5Oral pemphigus14.9248143-0.5CT scan, PET scan, lymph node biopsyThoracicHVRituximab, steroids, immunoglobulin, surgical excision3No relapseND
P5 / F14Left cervical lymph node12.8310-0.6-0Ultrasonography, CT scan, MRI, PET scan, lymph node cytopunction, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSteroids, Surgical excision5No relapseND
P6 / F15Torsion of an ovarian cyst and hepatosplenomegaly7.179121.289950PET scan, lymph node cytopunctionThoracicNDSteroids, anakinra, tocilizumab and radiotherapy8Reduction of pulmonary lymph node after radiotherapy, which remains persistent, no relapseND
P7 / M15.5Fever and aseptic meningitis---49610CT scan, lymph node biopsyThoracicMPSurgical excision11No relapse but unexplained fever episodes, pericarditisIL10RA: V406L/WT; IL36RN: S113L/W; MEFV: WT/WT
P8 / M11.5Fever and sporadic rectal bleeding7.9365211501050.5CT scan, lymph node biopsyPeritonealMPSurgical excision8No relapseND
P9 / F6Bronchopathy, 2 unilateral cervical lymph nodes13.72858.41-0Ultrasonography, CT scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSurgical excision0.75No relapseND
P10 / M13Thoracic lymph node14.32379.22-0CT scan, lymph node biopsyThoracicHVNo treatment18Lymph node stabilityND
P11 / F9Cervical lymph node13.81156.91-1Ultrasonography, CT scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSteroids16No relapseND
P12 / F123 unilateral cervical lymph nodes13.52308.61-0Ultrasonography, CT scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVNo treatment2.8Lymph nodes stability, coeliac diseaseND
P13 / M15Cervical lymph node14.73109.41-0Ultrasonography, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSurgical excision2.9No relapseND
P14 / M5Fever, cervical lymph node evolving since 2 years13.53588.71-3Ultrasonography, PET scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVNo treatment0.5Fever remission, lymph nodes stabilityND
P15 / F10.3Cervical lymph node134348.41-0.8MRI, PET-Scan, lymph node biopsyCervicalHVSurgical excision0.7No relapseND
P16 / M15Cervical lymph node15.7207-0.521.2Ultrasonography, CT scan, lymph node cytopunction, lymph node biopsy, PET scanCervicalHVSurgical excision1No relapseND
P17 / F13Abdominal pain, fatigue7.953629.765610.7Ultrasonography, CT scan, MRI, digestive endoscopy with biopsies, myelogram, lymph node biopsiesPeritonealMPSurgical excision3No relapseND

Hb haemoglobin, CRP C-reactive protein, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HV hyaline vascular, MP mixed pathology, ND no data, NGS next-generation sequencing, WT wild type

Fig. 1

A: Adenopathy localizations in 17 patients with unicentric Castleman disease; B: Histopathologic findings in a multicentric CD patient with plasma cell variant, B1: CD138 immunohistochemical staining revealing interfollicular plasma cells, B2: hyperplastic interfollicular region of the node with sheets of plasma cells; C: Imaging findings in a 4-year-old patient with multicentric CD. C1: 2 MRI-detected intra-abdominal masses at diagnosis. C2: Decreased but persistent masses at 1 year of treatment with tocilizumab

Clinical and laboratory features of 17 patients with UCD Hb haemoglobin, CRP C-reactive protein, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HV hyaline vascular, MP mixed pathology, ND no data, NGS next-generation sequencing, WT wild type A: Adenopathy localizations in 17 patients with unicentric Castleman disease; B: Histopathologic findings in a multicentric CD patient with plasma cell variant, B1: CD138 immunohistochemical staining revealing interfollicular plasma cells, B2: hyperplastic interfollicular region of the node with sheets of plasma cells; C: Imaging findings in a 4-year-old patient with multicentric CD. C1: 2 MRI-detected intra-abdominal masses at diagnosis. C2: Decreased but persistent masses at 1 year of treatment with tocilizumab Twelve of 17 patients underwent surgical lymph node excision (70.6%), 5/17 patients received steroids (29.4%), 3/17 (17.6%) patients received immunomodulatory treatments (tocilizumab = 2, anakinra = 2, rituximab = 1 and intravenous immunoglobulin = 1), 1/17 (5.9%) patient (P6) received radiotherapy and 3/17 (17.6%) patients had no treatments. At last evaluation after a mean follow-up of 5.33 ± 5.21 years (range 0.5–18), 12/17 patients were in complete remission (70.6%), 3/17 patients had a stable adenopathy size without treatment (17.6%), 1/17 (5.9%) patient had a persistent (but decreased) lesion after radiotherapy, and 1/17 (5.9%) patient (P7) still had recurrent fever after surgical resection of the adenopathy. P7 also experienced recurrent episodes of aseptic meningitis, pericarditis, neutropenia, lymphadenopathy, abdominal pain, persistent diarrhoea and interstitial lung disease. Screening for an autoinflammatory gene panel in this patient retrieved a class 2 (likely benign) heterozygous variant in IL10RA (V406L) and a pathogenic heterozygous variant in IL36RN (S113L) [7]. For patients with MCD (Table 3), the mean age at the first symptoms was 8.3 ± 3.4 years (range 2.8–13). They presented fever (5/6; 83.3%), abdominal lymph nodes (5/6; 83.3%), failure to thrive (3/6; 50%), hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly (3/6; 50%), arthralgia (2/6; 33.3%), abdominal pain (2/6; 33.3%), fatigue (2/6; 33.3%), facial oedema (1/6;16.7%), isolated lymphadenopathy (1/6; 16.7%), rash on the trunk (1/6; 16.7%), vascular hepatopathy with oesophageal varicose veins (1/6; 16.7%), diarrhoea (1/6; 16.7%) and cholestasis (1/6; 16.7%). One patient (P23) had autism and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Serum CRP level was increased in 5/6 (83.3%) patients; the mean CRP level was 50.68 ± 26.96 mg/l (range 7.1–96). Elevated IgG level was detected in 5/5 (100%) patients; the mean IgG level was 21.48 ± 7.69 g/l (range 15–36). The mean haemoglobin level was 10.23 ± 1.68 g/dl (range 8.8–13.6) and mean platelet count 319.17 ± 164.32 × 109/mm3 (range 141–665).
Table 3

Clinical and laboratory features of 6 patients with MCD

Patient/SexP18 / FP19 / FP20 / MP21 / FP22 / MP23 / M
Age at first symptoms (years)137611102.8
Initial symptomsLeft jugular lymph nodeRecurrent fever, arthralgia, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, abdominal lymph nodes, failure to thrive, fatigue and facial edemaFever, arthralgia, abdominal pain, abdominal lymph nodes and failure to thriveFever, abdominal lymph nodesRecurrent fevers, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, abdominal pain, abdominal lymph nodes, trunk rash, vascular hepatopathy and oesophageal varicose veinsRecurrent fevers, hepatomegaly, abdominal lymph nodes, failure to thrive, fatigue, diarrhea, cholestasis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Haemoglobin level, g/dl13.6998.810.110.9
Platelet count, x109/L261328270250141665
IgG level, g/l16151822.4-36
CRP level, mg/l7.16740964648
ESR, mm205575--131
Leukocyte count, x109/L7.410-78.114.9
Initial diagnosis-Primary parvovirus infectionStill disease then familial Mediterranean fever-unclassified vasculitis-
Initial treatment-ColchicineAspirin, methotrexate, colchicine, corticosteroids-Corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, colchicine, NSAID, anakinra-
Diagnosis delay (years)03.57.51172
Diagnostic investigationsPET scan, lymph node biopsyUltrasonography, CT scan, PET scan, liver biopsy, lymph node biopsyCT scan, PET scan, lymph node biopsyUltrasonography, CT scan, lymph node biopsyCT scan, PET scan, lymph node biopsyUltrasonography, CT scan, MRI, lymph node biopsy
Histological typeMixed pathologyPlasma cell variantMixed pathologyMixed pathologyNDPlasma cell variant
TreatmentsTocilizumabTocilizumabChemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and vinblastine), rituximab, steroids, anakinra and tocilizumabSteroids, splenectomyTocilizumabSteroids, tocilizumab
Follow-up time15 months6 years17 years23 years1 year1 year
EvolutionComplete remission, no relapse at 3 months after the tocilizumab weaningPatial remission, no relapse but persistence of hepatic hypermetabolic signals. Fluctuating lymphopenia and thrombocytopeniaTocilizumab weaning after 4 years of treatment: increased inflammatory markers and headaches. Resumption of tocilizumab allowing for a disappearance of the symptoms. No relapse with tocilizumabComplete remission, no relapsePartial remission, no relapsePartial remission, patient dependent on tocilizumab treatment. Appearance of non-specific inflammatory colitis.
Genetic variantNDMEFV: WT/WTMEFV: K695R/WTNDMEFV: WT/WTTNFRSF1A: P75L/P75L; MEFV: WT/WT

CRP C-reactive protein, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, CT computerized tomography, PET positron emission tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, ND no data, NGS next-generation sequencing, WT wild type

Clinical and laboratory features of 6 patients with MCD CRP C-reactive protein, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, CT computerized tomography, PET positron emission tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, ND no data, NGS next-generation sequencing, WT wild type Diagnostic investigations were lymph node biopsy (6/6; 100%), CT scan (5/6; 83.3%), PET scan (4/6; 66.7%), ultrasonography (3/6; 50%), MRI (1/6; 16.7%) and liver biopsy (1/6; 16.7%). Other diagnoses considered before CD confirmation were primary parvovirus infection (1/6; 16.7%), familial Mediterranean fever (1/6; 16.7%), Still disease (1/6; 16.7%), and unclassified vasculitis (1/6; 16.7%). The histologic types of CD on lymph node biopsies were mixed subtype for 3/6 (50%) patients and PCV for 2/6 (33.3%) (Fig. 1b). The mean diagnostic delay was 5.16 ± 5.81 years (range 0–17). All 6 patients fulfilled the diagnosis criteria of idiopathic MCD proposed by Fajgenbaum et al. [8]. The MEFV gene was sequenced in 3/6 (50%) patients. P20 was heterozygous for K695R, and P19 and P22 had no mutations. All three patients showed no response to colchicine treatment. The genetic test in P23, with MCD, revealed a homozygous class 3 variant (P75L) in TNFRSF1A. Patients received tocilizumab (5/6; 83.3%), steroids (3/6; 50%), chemotherapy (1/6; 16.7%), rituximab (1/6; 16.7%), anakinra (1/6; 16.7%) and splenectomy (1/6; 16.7%). The mean follow-up was 8.21 ± 8.69 years (range 1–23). Among the 5 patients who received tocilizumab, at last follow-up, P18 was in remission at 3 months after tocilizumab discontinuation, and 4 patients were still receiving tocilizumab: P19, P22 and P23 were in partial remission after 6 years, 1 year and 1 year, respectively, of tocilizumab, with decreased but persistent lymphadenopathies (Fig. 1c). P20 had a relapse upon discontinuation of tocilizumab after 4 years of treatment with inflammatory symptoms. Tocilizumab was then successfully reinitiated, with decreased but persistent lymphadenopathy. P21 was in remission after 1 year of steroids and splenectomy; she had no relapse after 23 years of follow-up. All patients (23/23; 100%) were negative on HIV-1 and HIV-2 serology, and 22/22 (100%) were negative on HHV-8 serology, HHV-8 DNA PCR of blood or LANA1 staining (HHV-8 immunostaining) on biopsy.

Discussion

Paediatric CD is an extremely rare disease, and its pathogenesis is poorly understood. We identified reference centres in France to gather one of the largest cohorts of paediatric CD reported so far, to build a national registry. Our patients had an equal sex ratio and underwent much diagnostic wandering and delay. The 2 types of CD differed in delay, with mean diagnostic delay of 8.16 ± 10.32 (range 0–36 months) for UCD and 5.16 ± 5.81 years (range 0–17 years) for MCD. In comparison, in a reference centre for adult CD, the diagnostic delay was t 3 months for MCD and 5.6 months for UCD [9]. The main reasons for the diagnostic delay in CD are probably the lack of specificity of calling symptoms combined with little awareness of this condition among paediatricians as well as insufficient dialogue with pathologists. Unfortunately, the diagnostic delay has deleterious consequences such as increased morbidity due to chronic inflammation in children, particularly growth retardation, and significant burden related to useless explorations and untimely treatments. Recently, a group of international experts published criteria for the diagnosis of idiopathic MCD that could help reduce the diagnostic delay [8]. These criteria include 2 major criteria: a standardized anatomopathological description and number of lymphadenopathies ≥2. Therefore, the diagnosis of MCD is based on a biopsy of a lesion and radiological staging on ultrasonography, CT scan, PET scan and MRI [10]. The minor criteria encompass many biological and clinical anomalies (11 criteria). Exclusion criteria are infection and oncologic and autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus. Despite these criteria, the differential diagnosis of autoimmune diseases is still difficult because autoantibodies (of systemic lupus erythematosus type) are found in about 30% of idiopathic CD cases [11]. All our cases of paediatric MCD satisfied these adult criteria of idiopathic MCD. In the future, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/MRI could have a role in staging, particularly in children because of the absence of irradiation with this technology as compared with PET or CT scan [12]. CD more likely presents as UCD (73.9–75% of cases) than MCD in children, whereas UCD represents 20.9% of CD cases in adult cohorts [2, 9]. Indeed, the disease mechanism may be different because most adult cases occur in a context of immunodeficiency associated with both HIV and HHV-8 infection, unlike in children. HHV-8–associated MCD represents a specific entity in terms of both treatment and prognosis. The association between CD and HHV8 has been reported only once in a child of consanguineous parents without HIV infection and living in an endemic country [13]. None of our patients was infected with HHV-8. The role of IL-6 is important in the inflammatory manifestations of CD, which can mimic Still disease, another IL-6–related condition with underlying autoinflammatory mechanisms. IL-6 is secreted by the germinal centres of the lymph nodes in CD patients [3]. As a result, in our paediatric cohort, 83.3% of MCD patients had fever and mean CRP level of 50.68 ± 26.96 mg/dl (range 7.1–96). Deregulation of the innate immune system may be critical in the pathogenesis of paediatric CD; this hypothesis was pursued by the investigation of autoinflammatory gene variants in five of our patients. Three underwent MEFV screening by Sanger analysis and two next-generation sequencing of a panel of autoinflammatory genes (additional file 2). Various sequence variants of unknown significance were retrieved in three different genes and in three of the five patients. In 2018, Van Nieuwenhove et al. reported a patient with MCD and adenosine deaminase 2 deficiency [14]. Overrepresentation of patients with autoinflammatory gene variants in paediatric MCD raises the possibility of amplified innate immune response to undefined triggers. Of note, systemic symptoms are also encountered in paediatric UCD and may be more frequent than in the adult counterpart: 17.6% with fever versus 4.2% without. However, this difference was not significant (p = 0.083). CRP level was also higher: 23.4 mg/dL (range 0–150) in children versus 2 mg/dL in adults [15]. Our results appeared to be similar to those observed in a recently published paediatric cohort of 24 patients [2] in which 44% of UCD patients had systemic symptoms. The HV type is the most represented pathological type in paediatric UCD, 76.5%, as compared with adults, 68% [9]. Even if our patient cohort is small, paediatric patients may present more cervical lymph nodes than adults: 44 to 64.7% in children as compared with 26% in adults [2, 9]. In MCD patients, PCV and mixed types are the main pathological types in adults and children (77.7 and 83.3%) [9]. The treatment mainly depends on the CD type. Surgery is the gold standard for treatment of UCD and may be curative in 95% of cases [16]. A surgical approach may be compromised in certain sites of deep lymphadenopathy or located close to vessels. Pre-surgical treatment may be needed to facilitate total tumour excision, as in our patients P1 and P5, who received corticosteroids and biologic therapies (tocilizumab and anakinra) to reduce the size of cervical lesions before surgery. For unresectable locations, radiotherapy can be discussed, although its long-term toxicity remains an issue, particularly in children. A careful wait-and-watch strategy without treatment can also be proposed [15]. The approach to paediatric UCD in our cohort appeared to be the same as in adult CD, with 70.5% surgery (vs 66% in adults) and 17.5% wait-and-watch approach (vs 15% in adults). Only one child received radiotherapy (5.8%, vs 11% (8/71) in adults) [15]. Treatment of MCD, even if possibly not curative, is essential to limit serious complications of chronic inflammation and to improve quality of life [11]. Until recently, this treatment in adults as in children was not standardized. If surgery was not possible, steroids and chemotherapy were the first treatment used historically, but their efficacy was relatively limited, with a high cost of related toxicities. New therapeutic approaches have emerged, including anti-CD20, anti-IL-1 and anti-IL-6 biologic therapies [1, 5]. New guidelines were published in 2018 for adult idiopathic MCD, with siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 antibody, and tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, now first-line treatments [17, 18]. For many years, tocilizumab was also used in paediatric CD [6]. In adult CD, tocilizumab allowed for reduction of lymph nodes to < 10 mm in only 52.2% of patients after 1 year of treatment [19]. In the same study, CRP and fibrinogen levels were normalized in 64.3 and 71.4% of patients, respectively, after 16 weeks of treatment. We also describe a suspension effect of tocilizumab on the disease in four children, with a complete response in terms of inflammatory symptoms. However, P20 showed a relapse of inflammatory symptoms after discontinuation of tocilizumab after treatment for 4 years, which then had to be resumed. For the other 3 patients, liver damage remained for P19, and decreased size lymphadenopathies persisted in P22 and P23. The question of weaning remains to be studied in children as in adults. However, one of our patients (P18) was in complete remission at 3 months after stopping therapy. Another study reported a total cure after combined chemotherapy followed by tocilizumab and discontinuation of all treatments [20]. The benefit of IL-6–targeting drugs in CD is not fully known because they have never been included in a comparative drug trial. Nevertheless, the therapeutic attitude in paediatrics now seems to be the same as in adults, with the use of tocilizumab as a first-line treatment for MCD. Our patients showed 100% survival after a mean of 6 years of follow-up (range 1 month to 23 years), for all types of CD. In adults, the prognosis also seems good in UCD, close to 100%, but quite poor in MCD, with a 35% rate of death at 5 years [21].

Conclusion

We report a large cohort of paediatric Castleman’s disease, in which, unlike in adults, the unicentric form was the most common. The new diagnostic criteria for idiopathic MCD should be tested in children to reduce the delay to diagnosis. The association of paediatric MCD with autoinflammatory gene variants, rather than HHV-8 and HIV infection, may not be incidental and suggests a primary deregulation of the innate immune system. Il-6–targeting drugs regularly eliminated inflammatory symptoms in our patients, but both treatment duration and long-term safety are still unknown. Additional file 1. Paediatric Castleman disease data collection questionnaire Additional file 2. Next-generation sequencing of a panel of 62 autoinflammatory disease genes.
  21 in total

1.  [Castleman disease in a child].

Authors:  C Piguet; C Dubouillé; B Petit; B Longis; E Paseaud; L De Lumley
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.180

2.  International, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria for HHV-8-negative/idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.

Authors:  David C Fajgenbaum; Thomas S Uldrick; Adam Bagg; Dale Frank; David Wu; Gordan Srkalovic; David Simpson; Amy Y Liu; David Menke; Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan; Mary Jo Lechowicz; Raymond S M Wong; Sheila Pierson; Michele Paessler; Jean-François Rossi; Makoto Ide; Jason Ruth; Michael Croglio; Alexander Suarez; Vera Krymskaya; Amy Chadburn; Gisele Colleoni; Sunita Nasta; Raj Jayanthan; Christopher S Nabel; Corey Casper; Angela Dispenzieri; Alexander Fosså; Dermot Kelleher; Razelle Kurzrock; Peter Voorhees; Ahmet Dogan; Kazuyuki Yoshizaki; Frits van Rhee; Eric Oksenhendler; Elaine S Jaffe; Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson; Megan S Lim
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  New workflow for classification of genetic variants' pathogenicity applied to hereditary recurrent fevers by the International Study Group for Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases (INSAID).

Authors:  Marielle E Van Gijn; Isabella Ceccherini; Yael Shinar; Ellen C Carbo; Mariska Slofstra; Juan I Arostegui; Guillaume Sarrabay; Dorota Rowczenio; Ebun Omoyımnı; Banu Balci-Peynircioglu; Hal M Hoffman; Florian Milhavet; Morris A Swertz; Isabelle Touitou
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Multicentric Castleman disease in an HHV8-infected child born to consanguineous parents with systematic review.

Authors:  Sandrine Leroy; Despina Moshous; Olivier Cassar; Yves Reguerre; Minji Byun; Vincent Pedergnana; Danielle Canioni; Antoine Gessain; Eric Oksenhendler; Claire Fieschi; Nizar Mahlaoui; Jean-Pierre Rivière; Rose-Marie Herbigneaux; Matthias Muszlak; Jean-Pierre Arnaud; Alain Fischer; Capucine Picard; Stéphane Blanche; Sabine Plancoulaine; Jean-Laurent Casanova
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Multimodality imaging and clinical features in Castleman disease: single institute experience in 30 patients.

Authors:  A J Hill; S H Tirumani; M H Rosenthal; A B Shinagare; R D Carrasco; N C Munshi; N H Ramaiya; S A Howard
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Treatment and outcome of Unicentric Castleman Disease: a retrospective analysis of 71 cases.

Authors:  David Boutboul; Jehane Fadlallah; Sylvain Chawki; Claire Fieschi; Marion Malphettes; Antoine Dossier; Laurence Gérard; Pierre Mordant; Véronique Meignin; Eric Oksenhendler; Lionel Galicier
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  IL-1RA agonist (anakinra) in the treatment of multifocal castleman disease: case report.

Authors:  Caroline Galeotti; Tu-Anh Tran; Stéphanie Franchi-Abella; Monique Fabre; Danièle Pariente; Isabelle Koné-Paut
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.289

8.  Castleman disease in pediatrics: Insights on presentation, treatment, and outcomes from a two-site retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jenna Sopfe; Ashley Endres; Kristen Campbell; Kari Hayes; Andrew T Trout; Xiayuan Liang; Robert Lorsbach; Maureen M O'Brien; Carrye R Cost
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  The clinical spectrum of Castleman's disease.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; James O Armitage; Matt J Loe; Susan M Geyer; Jake Allred; John K Camoriano; David M Menke; Dennis D Weisenburger; Kay Ristow; Ahmet Dogan; Thomas M Habermann
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 10.  Update and new approaches in the treatment of Castleman disease.

Authors:  Kah-Lok Chan; Stephen Lade; H Miles Prince; Simon J Harrison
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2016-08-03
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Castleman disease.

Authors:  Antonino Carbone; Margaret Borok; Blossom Damania; Annunziata Gloghini; Mark N Polizzotto; Raj K Jayanthan; David C Fajgenbaum; Mark Bower
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 65.038

2.  Comprehensive analysis of 65 patients with Castleman disease in a single center in China.

Authors:  Xi-Qian Wang; Nian-Nian Zhong; Qi Sun; Si-Chen Yan; Guang-Cai Xu; Yong-Gong Wang; Li-Wei Peng; Bing Liu; Lin-Lin Bu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Treatment and Outcome of Castleman Disease: A Retrospective Report of 31 Patients.

Authors:  Dijiao Tang; Yuetong Guo; Yi Tang; Hongxu Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.755

4.  Candidate biomarkers for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.

Authors:  Remi Sumiyoshi; Tomohiro Koga; Atsushi Kawakami
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hematop       Date:  2022

5.  Mediterranean fever gene variants modify clinical phenotypes of idiopathic multi-centric Castleman disease.

Authors:  Yushiro Endo; Tomohiro Koga; Yoshihumi Ubara; Remi Sumiyoshi; Kaori Furukawa; Atsushi Kawakami
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.