| Literature DB >> 32303185 |
Elham Nasiri1, Roman Sankowski2,3,4,5, Henriette Dietrich1, Aikaterini Oikonomidi6, Patricio T Huerta7,8,9,10, Julius Popp6,11, Yousef Al-Abed12,7,9, Michael Bacher1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) is a potent proinflammatory cytokine that promotes the production of other immune mediators. MIF is produced by most cell types in the brain including microglia, astrocytes and neurons. Enhanced expression of MIF might contribute to the persistent activation of glial, chronic neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Here, we investigated the effect of MIF on inflammatory markers and spatial learning in a mouse model of sporadic AD and on tau pathology in AD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Astrocyte; Cerebrospinal fluid; Cognitive impairment; ISO-1; Macrophage migration inhibitory factor; Microglia; Neuroinflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32303185 PMCID: PMC7164357 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-020-00163-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med ISSN: 1076-1551 Impact factor: 6.354
Fig. 1In-vitro results of STZ stimulation on murine Microglia and Astrocytes. a ELISA of MIF secretion in supernatants of astrocytes and microglia after 24 h STZ treatment. Graphs represent the mean of n = 3 biological replicates (two technical replicates for each) with standard errors of the mean (± SEM), (*P < 0.05, Student’s t test). b and c mRNA expression levels for different cytokine in response to STZ treatment in astrocytes (b) and microglia (c) with and without ISO-1 treatment. d- f. Cytokine ELISA of astrocytes after 24 h STZ treatment. Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates, error bars represents ± SEM (*P < 0.05, Student’s t test). IL-6 (d), IL-1β (e) and IL-12p40 (f) were released in response to STZ treatment in astrocytes using different concentrations of ISO-1 to inhibit MIF resulted in dose dependent decrease in cytokine release in both cell types. g-i Cytokine ELISA in wild type microglia. IL-6 (g) IL-1β (h) and IL-10 (i) were measured after STZ treatment with and without ISO-1. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)
Fig. 2In vivo regulation of GFAP, Iba1 and proinflammatory cytokines in different treatment groups of C57BL6 mice. qPCR of Gfap (a) and Aif1 (b), TNF-alpha (c), Il6 (d) and Il12a (e) ex vivo after hippocampal ICV-STZ. Graphs represent the mean ± SEM of 4 to 6 animals, tested in qPCR and ran as duplicate technical replicates. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed. (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Contextual fear conditioning in ICV-STZ wild type animals when treated with ISO-1 vs Vehicle. a Freezing during trace fear-conditioning (training session, n = 5 for each experimental group). b Freezing 24 h after fear conditioning session. Data is represented as mean ± SEM for n = 5 per group. Statistical testing was performed using Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05, n.s. - not significant)
Fig. 4Effects of MIF deficiency in MIF-KO mice and cells, in vitro and ex vivo and in vivo. a qPCR off hippocampal cytokine expression in MIF-KO mice after ICV-STZ compared to ICV-Veh treatment. Bars represent the mean ± SEM) of 4 to 6 animals ran as duplicate technical replicates. Statistical testing was performed using Student’s t-test. b. IL-6 ELISA in STZ-treated wild type and MIF-KO astrocytes. Data is presented as means ± SEM from n = 3 biological replicates (c). Freezing in the contextual fear conditioning task of ICV- with respect to ICV-Veh treated STZ MIF-KO mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM for n = 6 animals per group. Statistical testing was performed using Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05, n.s. - not significant)
Clinical characteristics and biomarker measures
| Controls ( | AD ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 70.5 (4.1) | 69.7 (4.6) |
| Gender, No. (%) of males | 5 (35.7%) | 10 (52.6%) |
| Education years, mean (SD) | 13.1 (2.6) | 13.3 (2.5) |
| MMSE scale, mean (SD) | 28.6 (1.8) | 23.8 (3.9)* |
| APOEε4 carriers, No. (%) | 2 (14.3%) | 9 (47.4%)* |
| CSF MIF (ng/ml), mean (SD) | 0.158 (0.096) | 0.270 (0.168) |
| Plasma MIF (ng/ml), mean (SD) | 0.045 (0.077) | 0.113 (0.170) |
| CSF Aβ 1–42 (pg/ml), mean (SD) | 990.3 (203.9) | 522.8 (134.0)* |
| CSF tau (pg/ml), mean (SD) | 182.1 (44.4) | 738.5 (407.9)* |
| CSF p-tau181 (pg/ml), mean (SD) | 42.6 (12.4) | 93.9 (35.7)* |
MIF macrophage migration inhibitory factor, APOEε4 Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination
*statistically different (p ≤ 0.05) from CDR 0, using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and binomial proportion tests for categorical variables
Fig. 5Correlations between the CSF concentrations of MIF and tau. Correlations between the CSF concentrations of MIF and (a) tau, and (b) ptau181 in subjects with early stage AD. CSF MIF concentrations were correlated with CSF tau and ptau181 levels (log10-transformed concentrations) (r = 0.629, p = 0.004 and r = 0.612, p = 0.005, respectively). Each dot represents a case from n = 19 cases and n = 14 controls matched for age, gender and education