| Literature DB >> 32302287 |
Alejandro Zamora-Vélez1, Jessica Triviño1, Sebastián Cuadrado-Ríos2, Fabiana Lora-Suarez1, Jorge Enrique Gómez-Marín1.
Abstract
The high prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in the human population in Colombia has been linked to the existence of a high density of urban stray cats, exposing the whole population to a high density of oocysts. The goal of this study was to determine the DNA prevalence of T. gondii by conventional PCR and to phylogenetically analyze ROP18 sequences from positive samples in domestic cat (Felis catus) fecal samples in the city of Armenia, Quindío. Fecal samples from 140 cats were collected from 10 districts around the city. Samples were concentrated using Ritchie's method and analyzed through optical microscopy. Concentrates were used for DNA extraction followed by nested PCR amplification for T. gondii gene B1. PCR for ROP18 was performed on all B1 positive samples; the ROP18 sequences obtained were related to the Archetype I Brazilian and Chinese strains. No oocysts were detected by optical microscopy; however, 17.8% (25/140) B1 and 24% (6/25) ROP18 PCR-positive samples were detected. Phylogenetic analyses showed that isolates clustered into a single group. We assessed whether associations existed between T. gondii positive fecal samples and survey variables such as cat healthcare and socioeconomic characteristics of owners, but no statistically significant associations were found. The presence of T. gondii in cat feces is an important factor contributing to the high prevalence in the human population of this city. © A. Zamora-Vélez et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Cats; PCR; Prevalence; ROP18; Toxoplasma gondii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32302287 PMCID: PMC7164795 DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2020023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite ISSN: 1252-607X Impact factor: 3.000
Figure 1(A) Phylogenetic relationships among ROP18 sequences from several strains of T. gondii as reported in GenBank, and sequences found in cats in Armenia in present study are shown with numbers (6_3_3; 5_1_6; 3_1_6; 3_1_8; 4_3_2; 4_1_8) and in red font. The phylogeny was inferred by Bayesian analysis in BEAST. Branch lengths indicate genetic distance, and posterior probabilities of nodes are represented by the size of the branches that separate from the node. Major clades labeled are supported by absolute support (PP < 0.99). (B) Neighbor-net phylogenetic network based on the rhoptry protein 18 gene from T. gondii strains. Potential reticulation between strains is denoted by the network patterns connecting strains.
Distribution of the samples collected in Armenia, Quindío, Colombia during 2014–2015 by commune and positive samples from domestic cat feces using B1 PCR to detect T. gondii DNA.
| Commune | Number of samples | Number of positive samples | % positive samples | Confidence interval (95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 2 | 10 | [7.6–12.3] |
| 2 | 17 | 1 | 5.9 | [4.6–7.1] |
| 3 | 17 | 3 | 17.6 | [15.1–20.0] |
| 4 | 14 | 4 | 28.5 | [24.4–32.5] |
| 5 | 19 | 7 | 36.8 | [33.7–39.8] |
| 6 | 10 | 1 | 10 | [5.4–14.5] |
| 7 | 18 | 3 | 16.6 | [13.9–19.3] |
| 8 | 12 | 1 | 8.3 | [5.1–11.4] |
| 9 | 8 | 3 | 37.8 | [31.8–43.7] |
| 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Comparison of PCR T. gondii prevalence in cat feces according sex and age (years) in the 140 cats from which the samples were taken in 10 communes from Armenia.
| Cats (140) | |
|---|---|
| ( | Positive samples/ |
| Gender (140; 100%) | |
| Female (78; 55.7%) | 15/78 (19.2%) |
| Male (56; 40%) | 10/56 (17.8%) |
| Non-determined (6; 4.3%) | 0 (0%) |
| Age in years (140; 100%) | |
| ≤ 1 (45; 32.14%) | 6/45 (13.3%) |
| > 1 y ≤ 7 (68; 48.5%) | 15/68 (22%) |
| > 7 (12; 8.5%) | 2 /12 (16.6%) |
| Non-determined (15; 10.7%) | 2/15 (13.3%) |
Note: The 7 years used as an age cut-off was referenced from Hand et al. [17].
Relationship between demographic, behavioral and cat care variables and presence of T. gondii DNA in fecal samples.
| Risk factor | PCR | PCR | OR. | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cat age (< 1 year vs. ≥ 1 year) | 6 vs. 19 | 45 vs. 70 | 0.4 | [0.1–1.3] | 0.1 |
| Cat sex (male vs. female) | 10 vs. 15 | 66 vs. 49 | 1.1 | [0.4–2.6] | 0.8 |
| Food (dry food vs. mix) | 14 vs. 11 | 72 vs. 43 | 1.3 | [0.5–3.1] | 0.5 |
| Faucet water for drink (yes vs. no) | 22 vs. 3 | 101 vs. 14 | 1 | [0.2–3.8] | 0.9 |
| Cats go outdoors (yes vs. no) | 16 vs. 9 | 61 vs. 54 | 1.5 | [0.6–3.8] | 0.3 |
| Hunting activities (yes vs. no) | 15 vs. 10 | 47 vs. 68 | 2.1 | [0.8–5.2] | 0.08 |
| Deworming at least once (yes vs. no) | 6 vs. 19 | 87 vs. 28 | 0.9 | [0.3–2.6] | 0.9 |
| Stray cats located around the house of the cat owners | 24 vs. 1 | 111 vs. 4 | 0.8 | [0–8] | 0.9 |