Angus A Leahy1, Myrto F Mavilidi1, Jordan J Smith1, Charles H Hillman, Narelle Eather1, Daniel Barker2, David R Lubans1. 1. Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA. 2. Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a time-efficient strategy to improve children's and adolescents' health-related fitness in comparison to traditional training methods. However, little is known regarding the effects on cognitive function and mental health. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of HIIT on cognitive function (basic information processing, executive function) and mental health (well-being, ill-being) outcomes for children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted, and studies were eligible if they 1) included a HIIT protocol, 2) examined cognitive function or mental health outcomes, and 3) examined children or adolescents (5-18 yr). Separate meta-analyses were conducted for acute and chronic studies, with potential moderators (i.e., study duration, risk of bias, participant age, cognitive demand, and study population) also explored. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included in the review. In acute studies, small to moderate effects were found for executive function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.98; P = 0.038) and affect (SMD, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.05-0.62; P = 0.020), respectively. For chronic studies, small significant effects were found for executive function (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.76, P < 0.001), well-being (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.02-0.41; P = 0.029), and ill-being (SMD, -0.35; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.03; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides preliminary review evidence suggesting that participation in HIIT can improve cognitive function and mental health in children and adolescents. Because of the small number of studies and large heterogeneity, more high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.
PURPOSE: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a time-efficient strategy to improve children's and adolescents' health-related fitness in comparison to traditional training methods. However, little is known regarding the effects on cognitive function and mental health. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of HIIT on cognitive function (basic information processing, executive function) and mental health (well-being, ill-being) outcomes for children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted, and studies were eligible if they 1) included a HIIT protocol, 2) examined cognitive function or mental health outcomes, and 3) examined children or adolescents (5-18 yr). Separate meta-analyses were conducted for acute and chronic studies, with potential moderators (i.e., study duration, risk of bias, participant age, cognitive demand, and study population) also explored. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included in the review. In acute studies, small to moderate effects were found for executive function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.98; P = 0.038) and affect (SMD, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.05-0.62; P = 0.020), respectively. For chronic studies, small significant effects were found for executive function (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.76, P < 0.001), well-being (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.02-0.41; P = 0.029), and ill-being (SMD, -0.35; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.03; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides preliminary review evidence suggesting that participation in HIIT can improve cognitive function and mental health in children and adolescents. Because of the small number of studies and large heterogeneity, more high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Angus A Leahy; Sarah G Kennedy; Jordan J Smith; Narelle Eather; James Boyer; Matthew Thomas; Nora Shields; Ben Dascombe; David R Lubans Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-06-04
Authors: David R Lubans; Jordan J Smith; Narelle Eather; Angus A Leahy; Philip J Morgan; Chris Lonsdale; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Michael Nilsson; Sarah G Kennedy; Elizabeth G Holliday; Natasha Weaver; Michael Noetel; Tatsuya T Shigeta; Myrto F Mavilidi; Sarah R Valkenborghs; Prajwal Gyawali; Frederick R Walker; Sarah A Costigan; Charles H Hillman Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: T M Wassenaar; C M Wheatley; N Beale; T Nichols; P Salvan; A Meaney; K Atherton; K Diaz-Ordaz; H Dawes; H Johansen-Berg Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Katie J Robinson; David R Lubans; Myrto F Mavilidi; Charles H Hillman; Valentin Benzing; Sarah R Valkenborghs; Daniel Barker; Nicholas Riley Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-03-21
Authors: Stephanie L Duncombe; Alan R Barker; Bert Bond; Renae Earle; Jo Varley-Campbell; Dimitris Vlachopoulos; Jacqueline L Walker; Kathryn L Weston; Michalis Stylianou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Ana R Alves; Renata Dias; Henrique P Neiva; Daniel A Marinho; Mário C Marques; António C Sousa; Vânia Loureiro; Nuno Loureiro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stefania Cataldi; Vincenzo Cristian Francavilla; Valerio Bonavolontà; Ornella De Florio; Roberto Carvutto; Michele De Candia; Francesca Latino; Francesco Fischetti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 3.390