Literature DB >> 3230120

Hyperstimulation: the need for cryopreservation of embryos.

E Van den Abbeel1, J Van der Elst, L Van Waesberghe, M Camus, P Devroey, I Khan, J Smitz, C Staessen, A Wisanto, A Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

Successful application of in-vitro fertilization (IVF), zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT) and gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) requires ovarian hyperstimulation for the maturation of multiple follicles. To control the risk of multiple pregnancies, the number of gametes (GIFT) or embryos (IVF, ZIFT) replaced is limited to three. For the supernumerary embryos resulting from IVF, ZIFT or GIFT, the strategy is cryopreservation for a later transfer. Cryopreservation was performed using either dimethylsulphoxide or 1,2-propanediol as a cryoprotective agent. Embryos were frozen either in the pronucleate stage with 1,2-propanediol or in the multicellular stage with dimethylsulphoxide or 1,2-propanediol. Survival after thawing was scored for both cryoprotective agents as a function of the developmental stage of the embryo and the embryonic quality. Evaluation of survival after thawing was performed on the basis of morphological intactness of the 1-cell pronucleate embryo or of the blastomeres of multicellular embryos. For pronucleate stage embryos, the use of 1,2-propanediol resulted in a 60% survival after thawing. For 2-cell stage embryos the survival was similar for dimethylsulphoxide and 1,2-propanediol. Later stage embryos survived better when dimethylsulphoxide was the cryoprotectant. For all stages, embryo quality before freezing was a crucial factor in survival after thawing. The pregnancy rate (12.2%) was similar for the two cryopreservation protocols. In conclusion, the choice of an appropriate cryoprotective agent can increase the survival after thawing when embryos are of good quality before freezing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3230120     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/3.suppl_2.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of pregnancy outcome of pronuclear- and multicellular-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  S Kattera; P Shrivastav; I Craft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison between two hCG-to-oocyte aspiration intervals on the outcome of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S Bjercke; T Tanbo; P O Dale; T Abyholm
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Cycle characteristics of day 3 embryo transfers with 4-cell embryos only.

Authors:  G Ertzeid; R Storeng; T Tanbo; P O Dale; S Bjercke; T Abyholm
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in unexplained and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility after fertilization failure with in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Authors:  Anne K Omland; Sverre Bjercke; Gudvor Ertzeid; Peter Fedorcsák; Nan B Oldereid; Ritsa Storeng; Thomas Abyholm; Tom Tanbo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Fertilization, embryo quality, and cryosurvival in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  J M Moilanen; M Tulppala; I Reima; O Hovatta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Follicular stimulation for high tech pregnancies: are we playing it safe?

Authors:  S Fishel; P Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-29

7.  Influence of zona pellucida thickness of human embryos on clinical pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  A Gabrielsen; P R Bhatnager; K Petersen; S Lindenberg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A pragmatic RCT of conventional versus increased concentration sucrose in freezing and thawing solutions for human embryos.

Authors:  M J Wood; J Mollison; K Harrild; E Ferguson; T McKay; A Srikantharajah; L Bell; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 6.918

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.