| Literature DB >> 32300945 |
Ana Paula Samy Tanaka Kotinda1, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura1, Igor Braga Ribeiro2,3, Shailendra Singh4, Alberto Machado da Ponte Neto1, Igor Mendonça Proença1, Marcelo Mochate Flor1, Karina Lopes de Souza5, Wanderley Marques Bernardo1, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura1.
Abstract
Intragastric balloons (IGB) are the most widely used endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IGB in comparison with sham or lifestyle interventions for weight loss in overweight and obese patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed to identify randomized controlled trials, which compared IGB with sham or lifestyle intervention. Thirteen RCTs with 1523 patients were included. The difference in mean %EWL and %TWL at follow-up was 17.98%, and 4.40%, respectively, which was significantly higher in the IGB group. Similarly, the difference in mean AWL and BMIL was 6.12 kg, and 2.13 kg/m2, respectively. IGB therapy is more effective than lifestyle intervention alone for weight loss in overweight and obese adults.Entities:
Keywords: Intragastric balloon; Meta-analysis; Obesity; Overweight; Systematic review
Mesh：
Year: 2020 PMID： 32300945 DOI： 10.1007/s11695-020-04558-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obes Surg ISSN： 0960-8923 Impact factor: 4.129