For Li-air batteries, dissolved gas can cross over from the air electrode to the Li metal anode and affect the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation, a phenomenon that has not been fully characterized. In this work, the impact of atmospheric gases on the SEI properties is studied using electrochemical methods and ex situ characterization techniques, including X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The presence of O2 significantly improved the lithium cyclability; less lithium is consumed to form the SEI or is lost because of electrical disconnects. However, the SEI resistivity and plating overpotentials increased. Lithium cycled in an "air-like" mixed O2/N2 environment also demonstrated improved cycling efficiency, suggesting that dissolved O2 participates in electrolyte reduction, forming a homogeneous SEI, even at low concentrations. The impact of gas environments on Li metal plating and SEI formation represents an additional parameter in designing future Li-metal batteries.
For Li-air batteries, dissolved gas can cross over from the air electrode to the Li metal anode and affect the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation, a phenomenon that has not been fully characterized. In this work, the impact of atmospheric gases on the SEI properties is studied using electrochemical methods and ex situ characterization techniques, including X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The presence of O2 significantly improved the lithium cyclability; less lithium is consumed to form the SEI or is lost because of electrical disconnects. However, the SEI resistivity and plating overpotentials increased. Lithium cycled in an "air-like" mixed O2/N2 environment also demonstrated improved cycling efficiency, suggesting that dissolved O2 participates in electrolyte reduction, forming a homogeneous SEI, even at low concentrations. The impact of gas environments on Li metal plating and SEI formation represents an additional parameter in designing future Li-metal batteries.
As demand for high-performance
energy storage devices continues to grow, “beyond lithium-ion”
battery technologies, such as conversion-type chemistries and lithiummetal anodes, are necessary to meet these needs.[1] Li–air batteries, for instance, promise extremely
high energy capacities, with estimated theoretical values up to 3500
Wh/kg and practical capacities in the range of 500–1000 Wh/kg.[2−6] Since the first report of a Li–air battery, various electrodes,
catalysts, electrolytes, and additives such as redox mediators and
H2O have been employed to lower charge overpotentials,
suppress side reactions, and improve the cyclability.[7−14] Although significant progress has been made at the positive electrode,
the generally irreversible reactions that occur at the Li metal anode
have not been fully characterized.[2,15]The
reduction potential of lithium is very low, such that it will
spontaneously decompose electrolyte, resulting in the growth of a
solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI).[16] An
ideal SEI is electronically insulating to prevent continuous electrolyte
decomposition, yet ionically conductive to lithium ions.[16,17] In a Li–air battery, SEI formation is affected by dissolved
gas diffusing from the positive electrode to the Li anode, analogous
to undesirable polysulfide shuttling in Li–S batteries and
gas crossover in fuel cells (schematic );[18−23] the saturated O2 concentration and O2 diffusion
constant for 1 M LiTFSI in tetraglyme were estimated to be around
∼0.6 mM and 10–7cm2/s in 1 atm
dry air at 25 °C, respectively.[24−26] Furthermore, while the
solubilities of other atmospheric gases are less studied, they also
affect SEI formation because of the reactivity of Li metal.[27−30] Several studies have shown that atmospheric gases, including N2, can affect lithium cycling.[31−33]
Scheme 1
Schematic of the
Li Metal Electrode during Charge in a Li–Air
Battery Where Gas Crossover from the Positive Electrode Can Participate
in SEI Formation
The stability of the
lithium SEI is crucial to battery performance
and lithium cyclability.[16,34−36] Discrepancies in previous literature on the positive or negative
impact of gas crossover on SEI formation and lithium stability have
yet to be explained.[19,20,31,32,37−39] Many reports state the necessity of using a protected Li metal anode
or SEI-forming additives to enable cycling in the presence of O2.[9,20,40−44] Furthermore, the effect of O2 partial pressures has not
been explored, yet this is relevant to Li metal batteries prepared
in dry room environments. These gaps in understanding necessitate
a systematic investigation of SEI and lithium plating in various atmospheric
gas environments.In this study, lithium metal was plated/stripped
onto a copper
substrate while exposed to O2, Ar, and N2 environments.
Ex situ techniques were used to characterize the SEI, including scanning
electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
(FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS). The presence of O2gas during Li plating, while
increasing the interfacial resistance, resulted in uniform nucleation
and dendrite suppression and enabled good Coulombic efficiencies.
A homogeneous SEI consisting of large LiOH domains is likely formed
as opposed to a heterogeneous layer formed of many microphases. In
mixed O2/N2 environments, Li plating morphologies
and cyclability were also improved, but without a notable increase
in resistance. These findings indicate that gas crossover in Li–air
batteries and other Li metal batteries plays a significant role in
SEI homogeneity and overall performance.Electrochemical
Cycling of Li Cu Cells. Lithiummetal was plated/stripped in various atmospheric gases with the Swagelok
design shown in Figure S1. An initial 2.5
mAh/cm2 of lithium was plated onto the Cu substrate, then
subjected to 20 stripping–plating cycles at 10% of the initial
capacity, all under galvanostatic conditions (Figure a). At the end, all available lithium was
stripped from the Cu. Coulombic efficiencies (abbreviated as CE) were
calculated using the Aurbach method, which provides an average efficiency
over the whole experiment (Figure S2).[38] Overpotential was averaged from the voltage
plateaus during plating. The electrolyte was 1 M LiTFSI in tetraglyme.
Figure 1
Electrochemical
cycling of Li|Cu cells. (a) Potential versus time
plot for galvanostatic cycling tests performed in O2, Ar,
and N2. (b) Coulombic efficiency and (c) plating overpotentials.
Four cells were repeated in each gas environment, and error bars show
standard deviations. (d) Galvanostatic plating–stripping for
one cycle. Current densities of 0.25mA/cm2 were used.
Electrochemical
cycling of Li|Cu cells. (a) Potential versus time
plot for galvanostatic cycling tests performed in O2, Ar,
and N2. (b) Coulombic efficiency and (c) plating overpotentials.
Four cells were repeated in each gas environment, and error bars show
standard deviations. (d) Galvanostatic plating–stripping for
one cycle. Current densities of 0.25mA/cm2 were used.The Li plating and stripping tests performed in
O2,
Ar, and N2 atmospheres showed stark differences in overpotential
and capacity loss. Samples in Ar, while initially cycling with a low
overpotential, showed a large jump in polarization after the first
9 cycles (Figure a),
indicating that no more lithium can be removed from the Cu electrode.[34,35] Almost 40% irreversible loss in capacity occurred in a single plating/stripping
cycle (Figure d).
This poor performance is in agreement with previous studies using
ether electrolytes.[45]By contrast,
O2 crossover greatly improved the CE (Figure b); however, there
was a large increase in overpotential (Figure c). Interestingly, O2 improved
the performance in carbonate-based electrolytes without increasing
the overpotential (Figure S3). This suggests
that improved plating/stripping efficiencies with O2 are
not solely due to high overpotentials, the high overpotentials increasing
Li nucleation density according to classical nucleation and growth
theory.[17] An N2gas environment
slightly improved the CE as well, without a drastic increase in plating
overpotential (Figure b).Impedance spectroscopy was performed following 20 plating–stripping
cycles, and the data were fit with an equivalent circuit model (Figure S4). Larger impedances were observed for
the SEI formed in O2, consistent with the trend in overpotentials.
The shape of the impedance was also different in the O2 sample, indicating differences in SEI structure and ion transport
mechanism.Ex Situ Morphology and Composition Studies
After Cycling. SEM images were taken to investigate the effect
of gas crossover
on the cycled morphology (Figure a). After the cycling and stripping of all the available
lithium, electrically isolated Li dendrites were visible in the Ar
sample, which explains the large capacity losses (Figure b). This dead Li was observed
in the XRD spectra for Ar and N2 samples (Figure S5). In an O2 environment, the cycled morphology
was more uniform and less porous (Figures a and S6), which
correlates with the weaker Li signal seen by XRD (Figure S5) and the higher CE observed (Figure b).
Figure 2
SEI morphology and composition studies. (a)
SEM images and (b)
XPS spectra for the SEI formed in various gas environments after cycling.
SEI morphology and composition studies. (a)
SEM images and (b)
XPS spectra for the SEI formed in various gas environments after cycling.Ex situ XPS was used to characterize the SEI components:
for all
samples, salt decomposition products, including LiF, Li2O, and Li2S, were identified (Figure b).[36,46] Peak positions are
well aligned with previous studies.[47,48] These peaks
increased with depth profiling while the C–C peaks decreased
(Figure S7 and Table S4), consistent with
widely accepted SEI models: more inorganic components closer to the
SEI/Li metal interface.[16] From the F 1s
and S 2p spectra, relative peak intensities of LiF (purple) and Li2S (cyan) were much larger for the SEIs formed in Ar and N2 than in O2 (Figure b and Tables S5–S9), and total atomic concentrations showed more F, N, and S content
as well (Figures S7 and S8). Online electrochemical
mass spectrometry results also indicate increased fluoride species
in Ar and N2 samples compared to O2 (Figure S9).There were fewer salt reduction
products in the SEI formed with
O2, and LiOH was observed from the XRD and FTIR spectra
(Figures S3 and S10). These peaks were
absent in the Ar and N2 samples. In addition, Li2CO3 (Figure b, yellow) was detected with larger relative intensities in the O2 sample; a C 1s peak at 283 eV, attributed to Li–C
species, was also detected in the O2 sample.[48,49] Although LiF-rich SEIs reportedly improve Li metal anode stability,
the poor Coulombic efficiencies in Ar samples, despite high LiF content,
suggest that other species—likely LiOH—and mechanisms
such as SEI uniformity may play a large role in controlling lithium
plating and stripping.[50−53]Studies of the Initial Li Deposition. The
initial
Li plating of 2.5 mAh/cm2, prior to cycling, resulted in
round, particulate Li morphologies for O2 samples (Figure a). In an Ar environment,
whisker-like dendrites were formed (Figure b). Both uniform nuclei and thick dendrites
were observed for N2 samples (Figure c). We hypothesize that O2 affects
the Cu surface, which subsequently affects lithium nucleation.[17,54] In galvanostatic plating, the low reduction potentials of lithium
dictate that electrolyte is first reduced; this continues until an
electrically insulating layer is formed across the Cu surface, preventing
further electrolyte reduction.[16,36] In the presence of
O2, less charge was irreversibly consumed to form this
initial surface layer (Figures d and S11); a similar effect is
seen with SEI-forming additives such as fluorethylene carbonates.[51,54] The peak beginning around 2.5 V in the voltammetry sweep corresponds
to O2 reduction on the Cu electrode prior to Li nucleation
(Figure e).
Figure 3
Effect of O2 on Li nucleation. (a–c) SEM images
of the first Li plating. Scale bar = 10 μm. (d) Voltage versus
capacity during galvanostatic plating. (e) Linear sweep voltammetry
to 0.3 V vs Li/Li+ and (f) subsequent FTIR measurements
of the Cu electrode.
Effect of O2 on Li nucleation. (a–c) SEM images
of the first Li plating. Scale bar = 10 μm. (d) Voltage versus
capacity during galvanostatic plating. (e) Linear sweep voltammetry
to 0.3 V vs Li/Li+ and (f) subsequent FTIR measurements
of the Cu electrode.In order to identify
surface species formed prior to Li nucleation,
FTIR was measured on Cu electrodes biased to 0.3 V vs Li/Li+ under O2, Ar, and N2 (Figure f). LiOH was observed only in O2 samples. No significant amount of LiOH was observed when biasing
to 0.3 V in an N2 environment and subsequently exposing
to O2 at open-circuit potential (Figure e, green). This indicates that LiOH was formed
electrochemically. These LiOH morphologies are visible in SEM images
of the Cu surface when plating in O2 environments (Figure S12a), whereas under Ar, the Cu surface
remains rougher (Figure S12b).To
test the hypothesis that the LiOH-rich SEI formed in O2 promotes more uniform Li nucleation, we explored a pretreatment
method whereby the cell was first cycled in O2 for 5 cycles
before purging and continuing to cycle in Ar. Cells cycled in Ar have
low initial CE of 60% which drops rapidly to below 5% after 5 cycles
(Figure S13), whereas similar cells cycled
in O2 maintained a CE of >90% for more than 60 cycles
(where
cycling was stopped). Cycling in O2 and then swapping to
an Ar atmosphere extended the cycle life to 30 cycles while maintaining
high efficiencies of >90% (Figure S13).
However, the cell still fails, indicating that O2 continues
to play a role in SEI formation during cycling.Effect
of Mixed Gas on SEI Formation. Lithium
was next cycled in mixed O2/N2 environments
to determine the effect of O2 at different O2 partial pressures. Impressively, CE values in O2/N2 environments were comparable to those of samples cycled in
O2 (Figure a), dropping to 80% for a 25:75 O2/N2 ratio.
The initial Li nuclei in a mixed O2/N2 environment
were also round and nondendritic (Figures c and S14a for
the 25:75 and 50:50 ratio, respectively). The plating overpotentials
drop steadily with decreasing O2/N2 ratio (Figure b), and the overall
SEI composition for the 25:75 sample is closer to that cycled in N2 (Figure d).
LiOH is still detected by FTIR and SEM (Figure S14).
Figure 4
Effect of mixed gas on SEI formation. (a) Coulombic efficiencies
and (b) plating overpotentials as a function of O2/N2 ratio. (c) SEM image after Li plating in O2/N2 (25:75). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d) XPS atomic percentage
for the SEI formed in O2, N2, and 25:75 O2/N2.
Effect of mixed gas on SEI formation. (a) Coulombic efficiencies
and (b) plating overpotentials as a function of O2/N2 ratio. (c) SEM image after Li plating in O2/N2 (25:75). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d) XPS atomic percentage
for the SEI formed in O2, N2, and 25:75 O2/N2.Discussion. The XPS, XRD, and FTIR results all
suggest that the SEI formed in Ar and N2 contains multiple
inorganic products from LiTFSI reduction. This heterogeneous SEI,
following the mosaic model,[16] leads to
nonuniform ion diffusion through the SEI, uneven Li plating, and dendritic
growth,[45,50] consistent with the observed dendritic morphologies
(Figure b). In constrast,
the O2 SEI contains large LiOH crystallites that form before
the onset of plating; this SEI results in much smoother and rounder
Li deposits, also coated with LiOH. The positive effects of O2 persist even when either swapping to an Ar atmosphere after
the initial cycling (for up to 25 cycles) or when using a lower O2 partial pressure.From the impedance measurements and
equivalent circuit modeling,[55] bulk SEI
resistances were similar across all
samples; however, the SEI formed in O2 had a larger resistance
modeled via a second resistor/capacitor component, likely relating
to grain boundaries and the formation of the LiOH layer. Lower grain
boundary resistivities were observed in Ar and N2 samples
by more than 60 Ω, indicating higher total ionic conductivity
and is reflected in the lower plating overpotentials (Figure c). The higher grain boundary
resistivity observed in the O2 sample is consistent with
a homogeneous and full covering layer of LiOH (SEM, Figure S12) that ions must travel through as discussed in
more detail in the Supporting Information (Figure S4 and Table S1).Two mechanisms have been proposed for
SEI formation in the presence
of O2 (Figure S15). The first
involves the reduction of O2 to form superoxides and then
Li2O2, which can then attack the ether solvent,
forming Li-carbonates, Li alkoxy species, and LiOH.[38,56] Li2O2 may directly deposit on the Cu surface
as well; however, this was not detected with the characterization
methods used. Although glymes have improved stability against reduced
oxygen species compared to carbonate solvents, the highly reductive
potentials during lithium plating may also affect the reactivity of
glymes, resulting in radical formation, the radicals then react with
O2.[21,57−59] The increased
Li2CO3 content for SEI formed in O2 is consistent with increased glyme decomposition (Figure b). Oxygen and nitrogen can
also chemically react with lithium metal; this appears to be a minor
effect compared to electrochemical SEI formation as shown in EDX measurments
of Li metal exposed to gas environments under OCV conditions (Table S2).[27,28,39,60]Water contamination is
another potential source for LiOH,[19,20] and efforts
were made in order to minimize this in our study (see
Experimental Methods in the Supporting Information). Interestingly, adding 1% H2O to the electrolyte while
plating/stripping lithium in an Ar environment showed no improvement
to the CE nor suppressed dendritic growth (Figure S17), suggesting that LiOH formed from H2O is not
responsible for the large improvements to Coulombic efficiency seen
when cycling in an O2 environment. This result has significant
implications for understanding lithium–air batteries in the
presence of water: multiple studies have shown that these cells cycle
even when the Li metal electrode is not protected.[11,38,61] The results presented here indicate that
O2 and not simply water is key in protecting the Li metal
(Figure S18).In conclusion, our
work demonstrated improved Coulombic efficiencies
when cycling lithium in the presence of O2. Even in a mixed
O2/N2gas environment—with an O2/N2 ratio close to that in air (and in a dry room)—O2 helped form a more homogeneous LiOH-containing SEI layer
on the Cu substrate surface, enabling uniform Li nucleation and improving
subsequent plating–stripping efficiencies. While LiOH is the
major component of the SEI, it is the SEI formed in the presence of
O2 rather than water that is key to the improved performance.
In the absence of O2 or other additives, a more heterogeneous
SEI is formed containing a more diverse range of species, which results
in nonuniform plating and dendrite growth. Gas crossover could therefore
potentially be used as a pretreatment method for promoting homogeneous
SEI layers in Li metal anodes. The effects of gas crossover on SEI
formation and overall cell performance posit design questions for
electrode fabrication in future Li metal batteries, including practical
Li–air batteries.
Authors: Jonathan Højberg; Bryan D McCloskey; Johan Hjelm; Tejs Vegge; Keld Johansen; Poul Norby; Alan C Luntz Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Mohammad Asadi; Baharak Sayahpour; Pedram Abbasi; Anh T Ngo; Klas Karis; Jacob R Jokisaari; Cong Liu; Badri Narayanan; Marc Gerard; Poya Yasaei; Xuan Hu; Arijita Mukherjee; Kah Chun Lau; Rajeev S Assary; Fatemeh Khalili-Araghi; Robert F Klie; Larry A Curtiss; Amin Salehi-Khojin Journal: Nature Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yuzhang Li; Yanbin Li; Yongming Sun; Benjamin Butz; Kai Yan; Ai Leen Koh; Jie Zhao; Allen Pei; Yi Cui Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Ning Ding; Lan Zhou; Changwei Zhou; Dongsheng Geng; Jin Yang; Sheau Wei Chien; Zhaolin Liu; Man-Fai Ng; Aishui Yu; T S Andy Hor; Michael B Sullivan; Yun Zong Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tao Liu; Zigeng Liu; Gunwoo Kim; James T Frith; Nuria Garcia-Araez; Clare P Grey Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Shaofeng Li; Yuanyuan Zhou; Katja Li; Mattia Saccoccio; Rokas Sažinas; Suzanne Z Andersen; Jakob B Pedersen; Xianbiao Fu; Vahid Shadravan; Debasish Chakraborty; Jakob Kibsgaard; Peter C K Vesborg; Jens K Nørskov; Ib Chorkendorff Journal: Joule Date: 2022-09-21