| Literature DB >> 32300628 |
Flávia P Morais1, Ana M M S Carta2, Maria E Amaral1, Joana M R Curto1,3.
Abstract
Tissue paper consumption has been growing for the past years, with a forecasted increase in demand for premium products. Premium tissue paper products are obtained with a balance among softness, strength, and absorption properties, optimized for each kind of tissue paper. These properties are influenced by the three-dimensional structure, made from the spatial distribution of cellulose fibres. To our knowledge, the efforts made to date to improve the softness, strength and absorption properties have overlooked the 3D structure. There is an absence of 3D experimental data in the literature for the simultaneous characterization of individual eucalyptus fibres and the paper structure made from these fibres. The 2D fibre morphology determination, including fibre length and fibre width, was obtained by an image analysis method for pulp fibre suspensions, using the MorFiⓇ equipment. The third fibre dimension, the fibre thickness morphology in the out-of-plane direction, was obtained using SEM images of non-pressed isotropic laboratory-made paper sheets. The effective fibre thickness morphology, consisting of the fibre wall and lumen, was measured in the paper structure, as this is precisely the key fibre parameter, influencing not only the structure-related properties, such as paper thickness, bulk, and porosity, but also the final end-use properties. The paper structures were produced using an ISO standard adapted method, for tissue paper structures, without pressing, with a basis weight range from 20 to 150 g/m2. These data are important, among other possible uses, for paper property optimization and simulation studies with 3D fibre based simulators.Entities:
Keywords: 3D paper structure; Cellulose fibre; Effective fibre thickness; Eucalyptus fibre morphology; Tissue paper
Year: 2020 PMID: 32300628 PMCID: PMC7152708 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
2D fibres morphology analysis of eucalyptus pulp suspension using the fibre analyser MorFiⓇ.
| R1 | R2 | R3 | Mean | Standard deviation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.657 | 15.127 | 15.191 | |||
| 0.684 | 0.689 | 0.687 | |||
| 0.797 | 0.801 | 0.799 | |||
| 18.8 | 18.8 | 18.8 | |||
| 0.0938 | 0.0965 | 0.0964 | |||
| 128 | 128 | 128 | |||
| 37.1 | 37.2 | 37.2 | |||
| 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | |||
| 0.429 | 0.426 | 0.405 | |||
| 22.33 | 22.49 | 22.53 | |||
| 43.2 | 44.9 | 44.2 | |||
| 16.17 | 16.52 | 16.74 |
R = number of replicates (1, 2 and 3) used to perform the morphological assays
Measurements of the third fibre dimension, the effective fibre thickness in the isotropic handsheet cross-section of the SEM images.
| N | Fibre Thickness (µm) | N | Fibre Thickness (µm) | N | Fibre Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.061 | 3.085 | 4.278 | |||
| 1.186 | 3.085 | 4.363 | |||
| 1.186 | 3.085 | 4.376 | |||
| 1.210 | 3.094 | 4.414 | |||
| 1.210 | 3.094 | 4.414 | |||
| 1.278 | 3.094 | 4.414 | |||
| 1.384 | 3.121 | 4.458 | |||
| 1.424 | 3.121 | 4.458 | |||
| 1.443 | 3.121 | 4.477 | |||
| 1.501 | 3.166 | 4.477 | |||
| 1.661 | 3.166 | 4.477 | |||
| 1.678 | 3.192 | 4.502 | |||
| 1.711 | 3.192 | 4.509 | |||
| 1.853 | 3.192 | 4.509 | |||
| 1.853 | 3.228 | 4.515 | |||
| 1.853 | 3.297 | 4.515 | |||
| 1.898 | 3.297 | 4.515 | |||
| 1.898 | 3.305 | 4.515 | |||
| 1.913 | 3.305 | 4.534 | |||
| 1.913 | 3.305 | 4.564 | |||
| 1.913 | 3.356 | 4.583 | |||
| 1.913 | 3.373 | 4.583 | |||
| 1.913 | 3.373 | 4.607 | |||
| 1.913 | 3.398 | 4.607 | |||
| 2.014 | 3.422 | 4.662 | |||
| 2.014 | 3.455 | 4.680 | |||
| 2.027 | 3.455 | 4.746 | |||
| 2.027 | 3.504 | 4.746 | |||
| 2.027 | 3.504 | 4.746 | |||
| 2.027 | 3.504 | 4.775 | |||
| 2.027 | 3.528 | 4.775 | |||
| 2.041 | 3.528 | 4.805 | |||
| 2.041 | 3.528 | 4.805 | |||
| 2.149 | 3.528 | 4.869 | |||
| 2.239 | 3.528 | 4.886 | |||
| 2.251 | 3.559 | 4.886 | |||
| 2.251 | 3.559 | 4.892 | |||
| 2.337 | 3.559 | 4.892 | |||
| 2.349 | 3.559 | 4.938 | |||
| 2.349 | 3.559 | 4.955 | |||
| 2.373 | 3.559 | 4.989 | |||
| 2.373 | 3.559 | 4.989 | |||
| 2.443 | 3.567 | 4.989 | |||
| 2.443 | 3.614 | 5.006 | |||
| 2.443 | 3.614 | 5.028 | |||
| 2.443 | 3.622 | 5.034 | |||
| 2.443 | 3.622 | 5.204 | |||
| 2.477 | 3.622 | 5.210 | |||
| 2.477 | 3.622 | 5.221 | |||
| 2.477 | 3.630 | 5.242 | |||
| 2.522 | 3.630 | 5.253 | |||
| 2.522 | 3.630 | 5.269 | |||
| 2.522 | 3.630 | 5.269 | |||
| 2.522 | 3.684 | 5.306 | |||
| 2.522 | 3.691 | 5.354 | |||
| 2.556 | 3.707 | 5.380 | |||
| 2.556 | 3.707 | 5.411 | |||
| 2.556 | 3.707 | 5.416 | |||
| 2.556 | 3.707 | 5.422 | |||
| 2.567 | 3.752 | 5.463 | |||
| 2.567 | 3.752 | 5.463 | |||
| 2.621 | 3.797 | 5.519 | |||
| 2.621 | 3.804 | 5.540 | |||
| 2.621 | 3.826 | 5.640 | |||
| 2.621 | 3.826 | 5.695 | |||
| 2.653 | 3.834 | 5.700 | |||
| 2.653 | 3.834 | 5.715 | |||
| 2.653 | 3.863 | 5.715 | |||
| 2.706 | 3.892 | 5.715 | |||
| 2.706 | 3.892 | 5.715 | |||
| 2.706 | 3.892 | 5.735 | |||
| 2.706 | 3.892 | 5.774 | |||
| 2.706 | 3.914 | 5.779 | |||
| 2.706 | 3.949 | 5.793 | |||
| 2.767 | 3.949 | 5.837 | |||
| 2.767 | 3.949 | 5.870 | |||
| 2.767 | 3.949 | 5.932 | |||
| 2.767 | 3.978 | 5.932 | |||
| 2.767 | 3.978 | 5.937 | |||
| 2.777 | 3.978 | 5.989 | |||
| 2.777 | 4.034 | 6.050 | |||
| 2.848 | 4.034 | 6.050 | |||
| 2.848 | 4.034 | 6.050 | |||
| 2.857 | 4.041 | 6.064 | |||
| 2.857 | 4.041 | 6.124 | |||
| 2.857 | 4.041 | 6.188 | |||
| 2.857 | 4.041 | 6.211 | |||
| 2.857 | 4.041 | 6.211 | |||
| 2.867 | 4.041 | 6.318 | |||
| 2.897 | 4.041 | 6.367 | |||
| 2.897 | 4.083 | 6.425 | |||
| 2.897 | 4.083 | 6.563 | |||
| 2.935 | 4.096 | 6.649 | |||
| 2.935 | 4.144 | 6.882 | |||
| 2.935 | 4.151 | 6.979 | |||
| 2.973 | 4.151 | 7.356 | |||
| 2.973 | 4.198 | 7.356 | |||
| 2.973 | 4.198 | 7.360 | |||
| 3.002 | 4.198 | 7.582 | |||
| 3.002 | 4.205 | 8.072 | |||
| 3.002 | 4.245 | 8.546 | |||
| 3.002 | 4.245 | 8.546 | |||
| 3.020 | 4.245 | 8.546 | |||
| 3.020 | 4.271 | 8.595 | |||
| 3.039 | 4.278 | 9.255 | |||
| 3.039 | 4.278 | 9.255 | |||
| 3.039 | 4.278 | 9.267 | |||
| 10.939 |
N = number of fibre measurements using the different SEM images
Fig. 1Out-of-plane handsheets SEM images cross-section (z direction) were taken scanning the paper structure from left to right (x direction) with the same depth (Y direction). Measurements of 322 fibre thicknesses (Table 2) were performed in nine SEM images. The vectors used to measure each fibre thickness are visible in each SEM image. The cross-section (a) represents the measurements of 1–20 fibre’ thickness described in Table 2; (b) of 21–41; (c) of 42–73; (d) of 74–103; (e) of 104–138; (f) of 139–174; (g) of 175–219; (h) of 220–264; and (i) of 265–322.
Mass and thickness (tissue ISO 12625–3) of laboratory isotropic handsheets (adaptation of ISO 5629, without pressing) made from Kraft pulp eucalyptus fibres in a conditioned room at 23ªC and 50% humidity (ISO 187) with basis weights in the range of 20–150 g/m2.
| 10 handsheets average | Eucalyptus handsheets basis weights (g/m2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.1 | 42.4 | 63.9 | 87.0 | 109.1 | 129.0 | 150.9 | |
| 0.437 | 0.911 | 1.354 | 1.862 | 2.323 | 2.747 | 3.254 | |
| 0.444 | 0.911 | 1.369 | 1.864 | 2.343 | 2.764 | 3.238 | |
| 0.456 | 0.911 | 1.337 | 1.870 | 2.350 | 2.745 | 3.242 | |
| 0.458 | 0.912 | 1.364 | 1.878 | 2.344 | 2.725 | 3.252 | |
| 0.468 | 0.902 | 1.370 | 1.925 | 2.289 | 2.730 | 3.187 | |
| 0.452 | 0.907 | 1.378 | 1.880 | 2.350 | 2.774 | 3.172 | |
| 0.441 | 0.883 | 1.368 | 1.858 | 2.339 | 2.748 | 3.227 | |
| 0.461 | 1.022 | 1.376 | 1.802 | 2.308 | 2.756 | 3.242 | |
| 0.465 | 0.740 | 1.381 | 1.841 | 2.339 | 2.817 | 3.227 | |
| 0.437 | 0.968 | 1.374 | 1.830 | 2.347 | 2.773 | 3.218 | |
| 109 | 175 | 269 | 323 | 422 | 492 | 613 | |
| 104 | 174 | 265 | 309 | 425 | 459 | 544 | |
| 113 | 185 | 257 | 326 | 408 | 474 | 573 | |
| 104 | 185 | 258 | 341 | 409 | 512 | 540 | |
| 113 | 176 | 247 | 315 | 419 | 496 | 593 | |
| 112 | 181 | 238 | 328 | 405 | 475 | 517 | |
| 107 | 168 | 233 | 312 | 416 | 484 | 566 | |
| 110 | 191 | 239 | 313 | 427 | 474 | 549 | |
| 115 | 157 | 228 | 323 | 427 | 497 | 566 | |
| 111 | 195 | 235 | 322 | 416 | 494 | 568 | |
| Subject | Materials Science (General) |
| Specific subject area | Tissue Paper Materials |
| Type of data | Tables and Figures |
| How data were acquired | MorFiⓇ analyser, SEM analysis, ISO standards methods |
| Data format | Raw and Analysed |
| Parameters for data collection | Hardwood isotropic handsheets for different basis weights were obtained using an adaptation of the paper ISO standard (ISO 5269) without the pressing operation, adapted for tissue papers. |
| Description of data collection | MorFiⓇ analysis was performed to determine the 2D fibre morphology of eucalyptus pulp fibre suspensions. |
| Data source location | FibEnTech, University of Beira Interior (UBI), Covilhã, Portugal |
| Data accessibility | With the article |