M Glatzer1, D Horber2, M Montemurro3, R Winterhalder4, R Inauen5, M D Berger6, B Pestalozzi7, S Pederiva8, M Pless9, P M Putora10. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Electronic address: markus.glatzer@kssg.ch. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Switzerland. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. 7. Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer depend on various factors, including performance status, tumor burden and patient preferences. Metastatic pancreatic cancer is incurable and many systemic treatment options have been investigated over the past decades. This analysis of patterns of practice was performed to identify decision criteria and their impact on the choice of first-line management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Gastrointestinal Cancer Group were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Decision trees for the first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer from 9 centers in Switzerland were collected and analyzed based on the objective consensus methodology to identify consensus and discrepancies in clinical decision-making. RESULTS: The final treatment algorithms included 3 decision criteria (comorbidities, performance status and age) and 5 treatment options: FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine mono and best supportive care. CONCLUSION: We identified multiple decision criteria relevant to all participating centers. We found consensus for the treatment of young (age below 65) patients with good performance status with FOLFIRINOX. For patients with increasing age and reducing performance status there was a decreasing trend to use gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine monotherapy was typically offered to patients in the presence of comorbidities. For patients with ECOG 3-4, most of the experts recommended BSC.
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer depend on various factors, including performance status, tumor burden and patient preferences. Metastatic pancreatic cancer is incurable and many systemic treatment options have been investigated over the past decades. This analysis of patterns of practice was performed to identify decision criteria and their impact on the choice of first-line management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Gastrointestinal Cancer Group were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Decision trees for the first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer from 9 centers in Switzerland were collected and analyzed based on the objective consensus methodology to identify consensus and discrepancies in clinical decision-making. RESULTS: The final treatment algorithms included 3 decision criteria (comorbidities, performance status and age) and 5 treatment options: FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine mono and best supportive care. CONCLUSION: We identified multiple decision criteria relevant to all participating centers. We found consensus for the treatment of young (age below 65) patients with good performance status with FOLFIRINOX. For patients with increasing age and reducing performance status there was a decreasing trend to use gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine monotherapy was typically offered to patients in the presence of comorbidities. For patients with ECOG 3-4, most of the experts recommended BSC.
Authors: Markus Glatzer; Kari Tanderup; Angeles Rovirosa; Lars Fokdal; Claudia Ordeanu; Luca Tagliaferri; Cyrus Chargari; Vratislav Strnad; Johannes Athanasios Dimopoulos; Barbara Šegedin; Rachel Cooper; Esten Søndrol Nakken; Primoz Petric; Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik; Kristina Lössl; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Peter Niehoff; Ruth S Hermansson; Remi A Nout; Paul Martin Putora; Ludwig Plasswilm; Nikolaos Tselis Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 6.639