| Literature DB >> 32299482 |
Yong Sun1, Changde Wang2, Chunzhu Gong2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repairing effects of glucosamine sulfate combined with etoricoxib on articular cartilages of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).Entities:
Keywords: Cartilage; Etoricoxib; Glucosamine sulfate; Knee osteoarthritis; Repair
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32299482 PMCID: PMC7164152 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01648-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Baseline clinical data of subjects () [n (%)]
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (case) | 0.024 | 0.876 | ||
| Male | 14 | 9 | ||
| Female | 52 | 31 | ||
| Age (year) | 61.58 ± 10.24 | 62.07 ± 11.32 | 0.229 | 0.819 |
| Disease course (year) | 3.74 ± 0.89 | 3.59 ± 0.75 | 0.891 | 0.375 |
| Lesion site | 0.642 | 0.423 | ||
| Left | 35 | 18 | ||
| Right | 31 | 22 | ||
| Kellgren-Lawrence grade | 0.285 | 0.867 | ||
| I | 16 | 9 | ||
| II | 27 | 15 | ||
| III | 23 | 16 |
WOMAC scores ()
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | ||||
| Before treatment | 17.36 ± 2.59 | 17.18 ± 2.45 | 0.354 | 0.724 |
| After treatment | 8.94 ± 0.83ab | 12.57 ± 1.36a | 17.086 | 0.000 |
| Joint stiffness | ||||
| Before treatment | 7.21 ± 0.68 | 7.25 ± 0.72 | 0.287 | 0.775 |
| After treatment | 3.14 ± 0.33ab | 5.07 ± 0.49a | 24.224 | 0.000 |
| Joint function | ||||
| Before treatment | 57.83 ± 6.07 | 57.36 ± 5.91 | 0.390 | 0.697 |
| After treatment | 30.62 ± 2.89ab | 41.27 ± 4.08a | 15.699 | 0.000 |
| Total score | ||||
| Before treatment | 84.16 ± 10.25 | 84.32 ± 10.43 | 0.077 | 0.938 |
| After treatment | 41.83 ± 4.09ab | 63.57 ± 7.38a | 19.524 | 0.000 |
Compared with before treatment, aP < 0.05; compared with control group, bP < 0.05. WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Clinical effective rates
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinically controllable (case) | 43 | 9 | ||
| Markedly effective (case) | 9 | 8 | ||
| Effective (case) | 9 | 10 | ||
| Ineffective (case) | 5 | 13 | ||
| Total effective rate (%) | 92.42 | 67.50 | 20.770 | 0.000 |
Bone metabolism indices ()
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGP (ng/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 3.39 ± 0.58 | 3.42 ± 0.61 | 0.253 | 0.801 |
| After treatment | 5.78 ± 1.26ab | 4.13 ± 0.94a | 7.157 | 0.000 |
| OPG (pg/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 118.42 ± 12.37 | 120.51 ± 12.64 | 0.836 | 0.405 |
| After treatment | 232.85 ± 24.19ab | 163.79 ± 17.38a | 15.747 | 0.000 |
| CTX-II | ||||
| Before treatment | 2.36 ± 0.27 | 2.41 ± 0.29 | 0.899 | 0.371 |
| After treatment | 0.94 ± 0.08ab | 1.62 ± 0.18a | 18.569 | 0.000 |
| COMP | ||||
| Before treatment | 4.85 ± 0.62 | 4.90 ± 0.67 | 0.390 | 0.697 |
| After treatment | 2.59 ± 0.31ab | 3.46 ± 0.48a | 11.345 | 0.000 |
| RANKL | ||||
| Before treatment | 84.73 ± 9.69 | 83.82 ± 9.44 | 0.473 | 0.637 |
| After treatment | 54.38 ± 5.77ab | 72.95 ± 7.51a | 14.307 | 0.000 |
Compared with before treatment, aP < 0.05; compared with control group, bP < 0.05. BGP bone gamma-carboxy glutamic acid-containing protein, COMP cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, CTX-II crosslinked c-telopeptide of type II collagen, OPG orthopantomography, RANKL cell nuclear factor κB acceptor activating factor ligand
Growth factors ()
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGF-β (μg/L) | ||||
| Before treatment | 22.07 ± 2.16 | 21.93 ± 2.08 | 0.328 | 0.744 |
| After treatment | 30.15 ± 3.04ab | 25.42 ± 2.47a | 8.313 | 0.000 |
| IGF-1 (μg/L) | ||||
| Before treatment | 83.41 ± 10.29 | 82.87 ± 9.83 | 0.266 | 0.791 |
| After treatment | 95.72 ± 12.06ab | 89.64 ± 11.25a | 2.579 | 0.011 |
| FGF-2 (ng/L) | ||||
| Before treatment | 23.58 ± 2.47 | 24.01 ± 2.53 | 0.861 | 0.391 |
| After treatment | 34.64 ± 3.59ab | 28.39 ± 2.92a | 9.298 | 0.000 |
Compared with before treatment, aP < 0.05; compared with control group, bP < 0.05. FGF-2 fibroblast growth factor-2, IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor-1, TGF-β transforming growth factor-β
Inflammatory factors and MMPs ()
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1β (pg/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 74.37 ± 6.95 | 75.02 ± 7.14 | 0.462 | 0.645 |
| After treatment | 38.56 ± 3.74ab | 51.48 ± 4.89a | 15.322 | 0.000 |
| IL-17 (μg/L) | ||||
| Before treatment | 391.64 ± 40.25 | 389.73 ± 39.52 | 0.238 | 0.812 |
| After treatment | 205.38 ± 19.76ab | 276.41 ± 26.11a | 15.858 | 0.000 |
| IL-18 (pg/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 232.59 ± 24.16 | 241.25 ± 23.96 | 1.794 | 0.076 |
| After treatment | 148.73 ± 13.25ab | 184.67 ± 17.13a | 12.099 | 0.000 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 87.94 ± 9.27 | 88.31 ± 9.56 | 0.197 | 0.844 |
| After treatment | 30.52 ± 2.86ab | 52.45 ± 5.02a | 28.679 | 0.000 |
| MMP-3 (ng/ml) | ||||
| Before treatment | 217.93 ± 20.54 | 221.01 ± 21.18 | 0.739 | 0.461 |
| After treatment | 98.46 ± 9.75ab | 158.37 ± 14.82a | 21.359 | 0.000 |
| MMP-9 (ng/ml) | ||||
| Before treatment | 66.83 ± 7.14 | 67.25 ± 7.21 | 0.292 | 0.770 |
| After treatment | 30.26 ± 2.97ab | 45.38 ± 4.62a | 20.524 | 0.000 |
| MMP-13 (ng/ml) | ||||
| Before treatment | 275.18 ± 28.09 | 274.92 ± 27.83 | 0.046 | 0.963 |
| After treatment | 152.43 ± 14.72ab | 193.76 ± 18.69a | 10.987 | 0.000 |
Compared with before treatment, aP < 0.05; compared with control group, bP < 0.05. IL interleukin, MMP matrix metalloproteinase, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α
Fig. 1JNK and Wnt5a mRNA levels. Compared with before treatment, aP < 0.05; compared with control group, bP < 0.05. JNK, C-Jun N-terminal kinase; Wnt5a, Wnt family member 5a
NO-induced apoptosis-related factors ()
| Item | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO (μmol/L) | ||||
| Before treatment | 65.82 ± 7.14 | 66.03 ± 7.21 | 0.146 | 0.884 |
| After treatment | 27.54 ± 2.69ab | 42.39 ± 4.28a | 21.957 | 0.000 |
| SOD (U/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 69.41 ± 6.87 | 70.12 ± 6.93 | 0.514 | 0.608 |
| After treatment | 118.59 ± 12.16ab | 89.48 ± 9.04a | 13.096 | 0.000 |
| LPO (nmol/mL) | ||||
| Before treatment | 8.74 ± 0.83 | 8.81 ± 0.86 | 0.415 | 0.679 |
| After treatment | 1.06 ± 0.15ab | 3.69 ± 0.42a | 46.343 | 0.000 |
Compared with before treatment, aP < 0.05; compared with control group, bP < 0.05. LPO lipid peroxidase, NO nitric oxide, SOD superoxide dismutase