Literature DB >> 32299115

A newly designed duodenoscope with detachable distal cap significantly reduces organic residue contamination after reprocessing.

Wiriyaporn Ridtitid1,2, Piyapoom Pakvisal1, Tanittha Chatsuwan3, Stephen J Kerr4, Kasenee Tiankanon1, Panida Piyachaturawat1, Parit Mekaroonkamol1, Pradermchai Kongkam1,2, Rungsun Rerknimitr1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A newly designed duodenoscope with detachable distal cap may reduce bacterial contamination by allowing better access to the elevator. We compared bacterial contamination and organic residue evaluated by rapid adenosine triphosphate (ATP) test and culture from duodenoscopes with detachable vs. fixed distal caps after high-level disinfection (HLD).
METHODS: During December 2018-April 2019, 108 used newly designed duodenoscopes were enrolled. In group A (n = 54), the distal cap of the duodenoscope was detached before manual cleaning. In group B (n = 54), the distal cap was not detached. After HLD, samples were collected from the elevator, submitted for culture, and evaluated using the ATP test, using the cutoff value of 40 relative light units (RLUs).
RESULTS: After HLD, the proportion of potential bacterial contamination and organic residue in group A was significantly lower than in group B (37.0 % vs. 75.9 %; P  < 0.001; relative risk 0.49, 95 % confidence interval 0.33-0.71), and also confirmed by median ATP values (45.2 vs. 141.0 RLU; P  < 0.001). In group B, one sample culture was positive for nonpathogenic bacteria. Pathogenic bacteria were not found in any culture from either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The detachable distal cap was more effective at eliminating bacterial contamination and reducing organic residue than a fixed cap. Nonpathogenic bacteria were detected in the fixed cap group after reprocessing. The ATP test with 40 RLU cutoff is a practical method to ensure the cleanliness of duodenoscope reprocessing without the need to wait for bacterial culture results. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32299115     DOI: 10.1055/a-1145-3562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  2 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal endoscope contamination rates - elevators are not only to blame: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hemant Goyal; Sara Larsen; Abhilash Perisetti; Nikolaj Birk Larsen; Lotte Klinten Ockert; Sven Adamsen; Benjamin Tharian; Nirav Thosani
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Amount of contamination on the face shield of endoscopists during upper endoscopy between patients in two positions: A randomized study.

Authors:  Rapat Pittayanon; Natee Faknak; Prooksa Ananchuensook; Thaninee Prasoppokakorn; Suppawatsa Plai-Dum; Tiwaporn Thummongkhol; Leilani Paitoonpong; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.369

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.