Literature DB >> 32298429

Impact of bone marrow biopsy on response assessment in immunochemotherapy-treated lymphoma patients in GALLIUM and GOYA.

Sarah C Rutherford1, Michael Herold2, Wolfgang Hiddemann3, Lale Kostakoglu4, Robert Marcus5, Maurizio Martelli6, Laurie H Sehn7, Marek Trněný8, Judith Trotman9, Umberto Vitolo10, Tina Nielsen11, Federico Mattiello11, Deniz Sahin11, Gila Sellam11, Peter Martin1.   

Abstract

The utility of posttreatment bone marrow biopsy (BMB) histology to confirm complete response (CR) in lymphoma clinical trials is in question. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of BMB on response assessment in immunochemotherapy-treated patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the phase 3 Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759) Plus Chemotherapy in Comparison With Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Obinutuzumab or Rituximab Maintenance in Patients With Untreated Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GALLIUM; NCT01332968) and A Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination With CHOP Chemotherapy Versus Rituximab With CHOP in Participants With CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (GOYA; NCT01287741) trials, respectively. Baseline BMB was performed in all patients, with repeat BMBs in patients with a CR by computed tomography (CT) at end of induction (EOI) and a positive BMB at baseline, to confirm response. Positron emission tomography imaging was also used in some patients to assess EOI response (Lugano 2014 criteria). Among patients with an EOI CR by CT in GALLIUM and GOYA, 2.8% and 4.1%, respectively, had a BMB-altered response. These results suggest that postinduction BMB histology has minimal impact on radiographically (CT)-defined responses in both FL and DLBCL patients. In GALLIUM and GOYA, respectively, 4.7% of FL patients and 7.1% of DLBCL patients had a repeat BMB result that altered response assessment when applying Lugano 2014 criteria, indicating that bone marrow evaluation appears to add little value to response assessment in FL; however, its evaluation may still have merit in DLBCL.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298429      PMCID: PMC7189300          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  17 in total

Review 1.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group.

Authors:  B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Opportunities and limitations of bone marrow biopsy and bone marrow FDG-PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Hugo J A Adams; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Bone marrow biopsies do not impact response assessment for follicular lymphoma patients treated on clinical trials.

Authors:  Sarah C Rutherford; Valery Li; Paola Ghione; Zhengming Chen; Peter Martin; John P Leonard
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Richard I Fisher; Sally F Barrington; Franco Cavalli; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; T Andrew Lister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Obinutuzumab or Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Umberto Vitolo; Marek Trněný; David Belada; John M Burke; Angelo Michele Carella; Neil Chua; Pau Abrisqueta; Judit Demeter; Ian Flinn; Xiaonan Hong; Won Seog Kim; Antonio Pinto; Yuan-Kai Shi; Yoichi Tatsumi; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Michael Wenger; Günter Fingerle-Rowson; Olivier Catalani; Tina Nielsen; Maurizio Martelli; Laurie H Sehn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  (18) F-FDG PET-CT and trephine biopsy assessment of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma.

Authors:  Chaitra S Ujjani; Elizabeth M Hill; Hongkun Wang; Samer Nassif; Giuseppe Esposito; Metin Ozdemirli; Christine Cordova; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  Minimal residual disease in non-Hodgkin lymphoma - current applications and future directions.

Authors:  Matthew L Chase; Philippe Armand
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Persistence of minimal residual disease in bone marrow predicts outcome in follicular lymphomas treated with a rituximab-intensive program.

Authors:  Marco Ladetto; Chiara Lobetti-Bodoni; Barbara Mantoan; Manuela Ceccarelli; Carola Boccomini; Elisa Genuardi; Annalisa Chiappella; Luca Baldini; Giuseppe Rossi; Alessandro Pulsoni; Francesco Di Raimondo; Luigi Rigacci; Antonello Pinto; Sara Galimberti; Alessia Bari; Delia Rota-Scalabrini; Angela Ferrari; Francesco Zaja; Andrea Gallamini; Giorgina Specchia; Pellegrino Musto; Francesca Gaia Rossi; Enrica Gamba; Andrea Evangelista; Umberto Vitolo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Total metabolic tumor volume, circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA: distinct prognostic value in follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Delfau-Larue; Axel van der Gucht; Jehan Dupuis; Jean-Philippe Jais; Isabelle Nel; Asma Beldi-Ferchiou; Salma Hamdane; Ichrafe Benmaad; Gaelle Laboure; Benjamin Verret; Corinne Haioun; Christiane Copie-Bergman; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Philippine Robert; René-Olivier Casasnovas; Emmanuel Itti
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-04-10

10.  The Value of PET/CT in Detecting Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma.

Authors:  Chava Perry; Hedva Lerman; Erel Joffe; Nadav Sarid; Odelia Amit; Irit Avivi; Mikhail Kesler; Jonathan Ben-Ezra; Einat Even-Sapir; Yair Herishanu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Follicular lymphoma: is there an optimal way to define risk?

Authors:  Carla Casulo
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  The value of FDG PET/CT imaging in outcome prediction and response assessment of lymphoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Zahra Kiamanesh; Narjess Ayati; Ramin Sadeghi; Eliza Hawkes; Sze Ting Lee; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  End-of-treatment PET/CT predicts PFS and OS in DLBCL after first-line treatment: results from GOYA.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Maurizio Martelli; Laurie H Sehn; David Belada; Angelo-Michele Carella; Neil Chua; Eva Gonzalez-Barca; Xiaonan Hong; Antonio Pinto; Yuankai Shi; Yoichi Tatsumi; Andrea Knapp; Federico Mattiello; Tina Nielsen; Deniz Sahin; Gila Sellam; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Umberto Vitolo; Marek Trněný
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 4.  Time for an individualized approach to first-line management of follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Guillaume Cartron; Judith Trotman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 9.941

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.