Literature DB >> 32298173

Smoking Behavior in Low- and High-Income Adults Immediately Following California Proposition 56 Tobacco Tax Increase.

Courtney Keeler1, Wendy Max1, Tingting Yao1, Yingning Wang1, Xueying Zhang1, Hai-Yen Sung1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To compare the association of California Proposition 56 (Prop 56), which increased the cigarette tax by $2 per pack beginning on April 1, 2017, with smoking behavior among low- and high-income adults.Methods. Drawing on a sample of 17 206 low-income and 21 324 high-income adults aged 21 years or older from the 2012 to 2018 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we explored 2 outcomes: current smoking prevalence and smoking intensity (average number of cigarettes per day among current smokers). For each income group, we estimated a multivariable logistic regression to analyze the association of Prop 56 with smoking prevalence and a multivariable linear regression to analyze the association of Prop 56 with smoking intensity.Results. Although we observed no association between smoking intensity and Prop 56, we found a statistically significant decline in smoking prevalence among low-income adults following Prop 56. No such association was found among the high-income group.Conclusions. Given that low-income Californians smoke cigarettes at greater rates than those with higher incomes, our results provide evidence that Prop 56 is likely to reduce income disparities in cigarette smoking in California.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298173      PMCID: PMC7204472          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  7 in total

1.  Cigarette prices, smoking, and the poor: implications of recent trends.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Anthony F Jerant; J Paul Leigh; Dennis Lee; Alan Chiem; Ilene Lewis; Sandy Lee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Response to increases in cigarette prices by race/ethnicity, income, and age groups--United States, 1976-1993.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-07-31       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Responsiveness to cigarette prices by different racial/ethnic groups of US adults.

Authors:  Tingting Yao; Michael K Ong; Wendy Max; Courtney Keeler; Yingning Wang; Valerie B Yerger; Hai-Yen Sung
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The quarter that changed the world.

Authors:  April Roeseler; David Burns
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Are increases in cigarette taxation regressive?

Authors:  P Borren; M Sutton
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The effect of the California tobacco control program on smoking prevalence, cigarette consumption, and healthcare costs: 1989-2008.

Authors:  James Lightwood; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The consequences of high cigarette excise taxes for low-income smokers.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; James M Nonnemaker; Kimberly A Watson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Characterizing Self-Reported Tobacco, Vaping, and Marijuana-Related Tweets Geolocated for California College Campuses.

Authors:  Raphael E Cuomo; Vidya L Purushothaman; Jiawei Li; Cortni Bardier; Matthew Nali; Neal Shah; Nick Obradovich; Joshua Yang; Tim K Mackey
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.