Literature DB >> 32298033

A qualitative study of Latinx parents' experiences of clinical exome sequencing.

Daniel Luksic1, Radha Sukhu1, Carrie Koval2, Megan T Cho1, Aileen Espinal2, Katiana Rufino2, Tania Vasquez Loarte2, Wendy K Chung2,3, Julia Wynn2.   

Abstract

Clinical exome sequencing (CES) is an established method for genetic diagnosis and is used widely in clinical practice. Studies of the parental experience of CES, which inform guidelines for best practices for genetic counseling, have been predominately comprised of White, non-Latinx participants. The aim of this study was to explore the parental experiences of CES in a Latinx community and to understand how their experiences are influenced by culture and language. We conducted semi-structured interviews in English and Spanish with 38 Latinx parents of children who had CES. Some of the themes that emerged were common to those previously identified, including a sense of obligation to pursue testing and a mixed emotional response to their child's results. Parents who had lower education level and/or received care from a provider who did not share their language had more confusion about their child's CES results and greater dissatisfaction with care compared with parents who had higher education level and/or received care from a provider who spoke their language. We also found evidence of hampered shared decision making and/or disempowered patient decision making regarding CES testing. Our data suggest unique needs for Latinx families having CES, particularly those who are non-English speaking when an interpreter is used. Our data support the value in continuing to take steps to improve culturally competent care by improving interpretation services and recruiting and training a genetic workforce that is ethnically, linguistically, and culturally diverse.
© 2020 National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; beliefs; cultural competence; diversity; exome sequencing; genetic counseling; genetic services; genetic testing; parents; pediatrics; psychosocial; underrepresented populations

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298033     DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  4 in total

1.  Perceived utility and disutility of genomic sequencing for pediatric patients: Perspectives from parents with diverse sociodemographic characteristics.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Jennifer L Young; Liliana Fernandez; Jennefer N Kohler; Jonathan A Bernstein; Matthew T Wheeler; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.

Authors:  Dana Watnick; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Katie M Gallagher; Nehama Teitelman; Katherine E Donohue; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Siobhan M Dolan; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-02-03

3.  Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Simon M Outram; Julia E H Brown; Astrid N Zamora; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Stephanie Luca; Daniel Assamad; Ayushi Bhatt; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.