Literature DB >> 32297905

Association of Utilization Management Policy With Uptake of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Among Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Ravi B Parikh1,2,3, Ezra Fishman4, Winnie Chi4, Robert P Zimmerman5, Atul Gupta6, John J Barron4, Gosia Sylwestrzak4, Justin E Bekelman1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Breast cancer accounts for the largest portion of cancer-related spending in the United States. Although hypofractionated radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery is a cost-effective and convenient treatment strategy for patients with early-stage breast cancer, less than 40% of eligible women received hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2013. Objective: To assess the association of a large commercial payer's utilization management policy with the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy among women with early-stage breast cancer and its associated cost. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, adjusted difference-in-differences economic analysis was conducted using administrative claims data from January 1, 2012, to June 1, 2018, of women 18 years or older with early-stage breast cancer who were eligible for hypofractionated radiotherapy according to 2011 guidelines from the American Society for Radiation Oncology and were continuously enrolled in 14 geographically diverse commercial health plans covering 6.9% of US adult women. Women who received mastectomy, brachytherapy, or less than 11 or more than 40 external beam fractions of radiotherapy were excluded. A utilization management policy was used to encourage the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy among women in fully insured and Medicare Advantage (fully insured) plans. Under the new policy, claims for extended-course radiotherapy were not reimbursed for fully insured women who were eligible for hypofractionated radiotherapy. This policy did not apply to women in self-insured or Medicare supplemental insurance (self-insured) plans, allowing these groups to serve as a comparison group. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was use of hypofractionated radiotherapy, and the secondary outcome was the cost of this type of radiotherapy.
Results: Of 10 540 eligible women, 3619 (34.3%) were in fully insured plans and thus subject to the policy. There were no meaningful differences between the fully insured and self-insured groups in mean (SD) age at the start of radiotherapy (63.8 [8.6] vs 65.0 [8.9] years), mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3.0 [1.5] vs 3.2 [1.6]), or practice setting (outpatient hospital setting, 2982 of 3619 [82.4%] vs 5600 of 6921 [80.9%]). The policy was associated with an increase in use of hypofractionated radiotherapy among fully insured patients subject to the policy (adjusted percentage point difference-in-difference, 4.2%; 95% CI, 0.0%-8.4%; P = .05) and a nonsignificant decrease in radiotherapy-associated expenditures (-$2275 relative to self-insured patients; P = .09). Spillover analyses revealed a significantly higher uptake of hypofractionated radiotherapy among self-insured patients who were indirectly exposed to the policy (adjusted percentage point difference-in-difference, 8.5%; 95% CI, 3.6%-13.5%; P < .001) compared with those who were not exposed. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that a payer's utilization management policy was associated with direct and spillover increases in the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy, even after accounting for a long-term secular trend in the uptake of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the control groups. Utilization management may promote evidence-based cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32297905      PMCID: PMC7163785          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  30 in total

1.  National estimates of out-of-pocket health care expenditure burdens among nonelderly adults with cancer: 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Didem S M Bernard; Stacy L Farr; Zhengyi Fang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Managing utilization management: a purchaser's view.

Authors:  A Milstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on the Impact of Utilization Management Policies for Cancer Drug Therapies.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Fractionation for whole breast irradiation: an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Soren M Bentzen; Candace R Correa; Carol A Hahn; Patricia H Hardenbergh; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Beryl McCormick; Julie R McQueen; Lori J Pierce; Simon N Powell; Abram Recht; Alphonse G Taghian; Frank A Vicini; Julia R White; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Gosia Sylwestrzak; John Barron; Jinan Liu; Andrew J Epstein; Gary Freedman; Jennifer Malin; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparison of Treatment Costs for Breast Cancer, by Tumor Stage and Type of Service.

Authors:  Helen Blumen; Kathryn Fitch; Vincent Polkus
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-02

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Therese M Mulvey; Robert M Langdon; Diane Blum; Peter A Ubel; Lowell E Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Acute and Short-term Toxic Effects of Conventionally Fractionated vs Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Simona F Shaitelman; Pamela J Schlembach; Isidora Arzu; Matthew Ballo; Elizabeth S Bloom; Daniel Buchholz; Gregory M Chronowski; Tomas Dvorak; Emily Grade; Karen E Hoffman; Patrick Kelly; Michelle Ludwig; George H Perkins; Valerie Reed; Shalin Shah; Michael C Stauder; Eric A Strom; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Joe Ensor; Donald Baumann; Alastair M Thompson; Diana Amaya; Tanisha Davis; William Guerra; Lois Hamblin; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Authors:  Alan Rosenberg; Abiy Agiro; Marc Gottlieb; John Barron; Peter Brady; Ying Liu; Cindy Li; Andrea DeVries
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Effects of removing reimbursement restrictions on targeted therapy accessibility for non-small cell lung cancer treatment in Taiwan: an interrupted time series study.

Authors:  Jason C Hsu; Chen-Fang Wei; Szu-Chun Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  7 in total

1.  Are 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial Results Sufficient for Implementation of Short-Course Whole Breast Radiation Therapy?

Authors:  Erin F Gillespie; Atif J Khan; Oren Cahlon; Lior Z Braunstein
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct

2.  Coverage Denials: Government And Private Insurer Policies For Medical Necessity In Medicare.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Yujun Chen; Chris L Jagmin; Dorothea J Verbrugge; Troyen A Brennan; Peter W Groeneveld; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 9.048

3.  Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: Financial Risk and Expenditures in the United States, 2008 to 2017.

Authors:  Loren Saulsberry; Chuanhong Liao; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 8.013

4.  Measuring the Scope of Prior Authorization Policies: Applying Private Insurer Rules to Medicare Part B.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Troyen A Brennan; Dorothea J Verbrugge; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 5.  Mechanisms of radiation-induced endothelium damage: Emerging models and technologies.

Authors:  Harshani Wijerathne; Jordan C Langston; Qingliang Yang; Shuang Sun; Curtis Miyamoto; Laurie E Kilpatrick; Mohammad F Kiani
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The Case for Brachytherapy: Why It Deserves a Renaissance.

Authors:  Vonetta M Williams; Jenna M Kahn; Nikhil G Thaker; Sushil Beriwal; Paul L Nguyen; Douglas Arthur; Daniel Petereit; Brandon A Dyer
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-06

7.  Trends in Radiation Oncology Treatment Fractionation at a Single Academic Center, 2010 to 2020.

Authors:  Benjamin A Y Cher; Michael Dykstra; Chang Wang; Matthew Schipper; James A Hayman; Charles S Mayo; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.