Literature DB >> 32297765

An attributional process model of workplace gossip.

Stephen H Lee1, Christopher M Barnes1.   

Abstract

Despite the ubiquity of gossip in the workplace, the management literature offers a limited understanding of its consequences for gossip senders. To understand whether gossiping is beneficial or detrimental for the gossip sender, it is necessary to consider the perspective of gossip recipients and their response to gossip. We develop a typology of gossip that characterizes archetypal patterns of interpreting gossip. We then draw from attribution theory to develop a multilevel process model of workplace gossip that focuses on how the gossip recipient's attributions of a gossip episode shape the gossip recipient's subsequent response and behaviors. In addition to the valence and work-relatedness dimensions of gossip that comprise the typology, we examine credibility and the status of the gossip target as fundamental features of the gossip episode that jointly affect the gossip recipient's attributions. At the episodic level, the process of deciphering the gossip sender's motives influences the subsequent reciprocation of gossip. Depending on the locus of causality attributed to the gossip episode, gossip also contributes to the perceived trustworthiness of the gossip sender and the gossip recipient's cooperation with or social undermining of the gossip sender over time. The proposed model suggests that the potential benefits or social consequences of gossip for the gossip sender depend on the characteristics of the gossip and the context of the gossip episode that serve as inputs to the gossip recipient's attributional process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32297765     DOI: 10.1037/apl0000504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  5 in total

1.  Don't Speak Ill of Others Behind Their Backs: Receivers' Ostracism (Sender-Oriented)  Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip.

Authors:  Gengxuan Guo; Qunxi Gong; Sipan Li; Xuedong Liang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Gossip promotes cooperation only when it is pro-socially motivated.

Authors:  Martina Testori; Charlotte K Hemelrijk; Bianca Beersma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.

Authors:  José Luis Estévez; Károly Takács
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  Dealing With Negative Workplace Gossip: From the Perspective of Face.

Authors:  Boqiang Zong; Shiyong Xu; Lihua Zhang; Jinzhao Qu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 5.  Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review.

Authors:  Károly Takács; Jörg Gross; Martina Testori; Srebrenka Letina; Adam R Kenny; Eleanor A Power; Rafael P M Wittek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.