Literature DB >> 32297655

Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera-trap data.

Neil A Gilbert1, John D J Clare1, Jennifer L Stenglein2, Benjamin Zuckerberg1.   

Abstract

The rapid improvement of camera traps in recent decades has revolutionized biodiversity monitoring. Despite clear applications in conservation science, camera traps have seldom been used to model the abundance of unmarked animal populations. We sought to summarize the challenges facing abundance estimation of unmarked animals, compile an overview of existing analytical frameworks, and provide guidance for practitioners seeking a suitable method. When a camera records multiple detections of an unmarked animal, one cannot determine whether the images represent multiple mobile individuals or a single individual repeatedly entering the camera viewshed. Furthermore, animal movement obfuscates a clear definition of the sampling area and, as a result, the area to which an abundance estimate corresponds. Recognizing these challenges, we identified 6 analytical approaches and reviewed 927 camera-trap studies published from 2014 to 2019 to assess the use and prevalence of each method. Only about 5% of the studies used any of the abundance-estimation methods we identified. Most of these studies estimated local abundance or covariate relationships rather than predicting abundance or density over broader areas. Next, for each analytical approach, we compiled the data requirements, assumptions, advantages, and disadvantages to help practitioners navigate the landscape of abundance estimation methods. When seeking an appropriate method, practitioners should evaluate the life history of the focal taxa, carefully define the area of the sampling frame, and consider what types of data collection are possible. The challenge of estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations persists; although multiple methods exist, no one method is optimal for camera-trap data under all circumstances. As analytical frameworks continue to evolve and abundance estimation of unmarked animals becomes increasingly common, camera traps will become even more important for informing conservation decision-making.
© 2020 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  biodiversity monitoring; densidad de población; hierarchical modeling; modelado jerárquico; modelado poblacional; modelos de distribución de especies; monitoreo de la biodiversidad; métodos no invasivos; noninvasive methods; population density; population modeling; predicción; prediction; species distribution models; 层级模型; 无损伤方法; 物种分布模型; 生物多样性监测; 种群密度; 种群建模; 预测

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32297655     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  2 in total

1.  Double-observer approach with camera traps can correct imperfect detection and improve the accuracy of density estimation of unmarked animal populations.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Nakashima; Shun Hongo; Kaori Mizuno; Gota Yajima; Zeun's C B Dzefck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Methodological approaches for estimating populations of the endangered dhole Cuon alpinus.

Authors:  Girish A Punjabi; Linnea Worsøe Havmøller; Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller; Dusit Ngoprasert; Arjun Srivathsa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.