Literature DB >> 32297645

General practitioners' perceptions on the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a risk prediction checklist to support their end-of-life discussions in routine care: a qualitative study.

Ebony T Lewis1,2, Abela Mahimbo3, Christine Linhart1, Margaret Williamson1,3, Mark Morgan4, Kathrine Hammill5, John Hall1, Magnolia Cardona6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practitioners' (GPs) play a central role in facilitating end-of-life discussions with older patients nearing the end-of-life. However, prognostic uncertainty of time to death is one important barrier to initiation of these discussions.
OBJECTIVE: To explore GPs' perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a risk prediction checklist to identify older patients in their last 12 months of life and describe perceived barriers and facilitators for implementing end-of-life planning.
METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 GPs practising in metropolitan locations in New South Wales and Queensland between May and June 2019. Data were analysed thematically.
RESULTS: Eight themes emerged: accessibility and implementation of the checklist, uncertainty around checklist's accuracy and usefulness, time of the checklist, checklist as a potential prompt for end-of-life conversations, end-of-life conversations not an easy topic, end-of-life conversation requires time and effort, uncertainty in identifying end-of-life patients and limited community literacy on end-of-life. Most participants welcomed a risk prediction checklist in routine practice if assured of its accuracy in identifying which patients were nearing end-of-life.
CONCLUSIONS: Most participating GPs saw the value in risk assessment and end-of-life planning. Many emphasized the need for appropriate support, tools and funding for prognostic screening and end-of-life planning for this to become routine in general practice. Well validated risk prediction tools are needed to increase clinician confidence in identifying risk of death to support end-of-life care planning.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; death and dying; end-of-life care; primary care; risk assessment; screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 32297645     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  2 in total

1.  Implementation of a calculator to predict cesarean delivery during labor induction: a qualitative evaluation of the clinician perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Lisa D Levine; Maria N Nelson; Rinad Beidas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-01-22

2.  Communicating uncertainty: contrasting the communication experiences of patients with advanced COPD and incurable lung cancer.

Authors:  Nothando Ngwenya; Clare Crang; Morag Farquhar; Robert C Rintoul; Ravi Mahadeva; Lori D Calvert; Scott A Murray; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.