Kristen M Fedak1, Nicholas Good1, Ethan S Walker1, John Balmes2, Robert D Brook3, Maggie L Clark1, Tom Cole-Hunter1,4,5,6, Robert Devlin7, Christian L'Orange8, Gary Luckasen9, John Mehaffy8, Rhiannon Shelton1, Ander Wilson10, John Volckens8, Jennifer L Peel1. 1. Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Centre for Air pollution, energy, and health Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 5. International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 7. Environmental Public Health Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA. 8. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 9. Heart Center of the Rockies, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 10. Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Abstract
Background: Exposure to household air pollution generated as a result of cooking and heating is a leading contributor to global disease. The effects of cookstove-generated air pollution on adult lung function, however, remain uncertain. Objectives: We investigated acute responses in lung function following controlled exposures to cookstove-generated air pollution. Methods: We recruited 48 healthy adult volunteers to undergo six two-hour treatments: a filtered-air control and emissions from five different stoves with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) targets from 10 to 500 µg/m3. Spirometry was conducted prior to exposure and immediately, and three and 24 h post-exposure. Mixed-effect models were used to estimate differences in post-exposure lung function for stove treatments versus control. Results: Immediately post-exposure, lung function was lower compared to the control for the three highest PM2.5-level stoves. The largest differences were for the fan rocket stove (target 250 µg/m3; forced vital capacity (FVC): -60 mL, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -135, 15; forced expiratory volume (FEV1): -51 mL, 95% CI -117, 16; mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75): -116 mL/s, 95% CI -239, 8). At 3 h post-exposure, lung function was lower compared to the control for all stove treatments; effects were of similar magnitude for all stoves. At 24 h post-exposure, results were consistent with a null association for FVC and FEV1; FEF25-75 was lower relative to the control for the gasifier, fan rocket, and three stone fire.Conclusions: Patterns suggesting short-term decreases in lung function follow from exposure to cookstove air pollution even for stove exposures with low PM2.5 levels.
Background: Exposure to household air pollution generated as a result of cooking and heating is a leading contributor to global disease. The effects of cookstove-generated air pollution on adult lung function, however, remain uncertain. Objectives: We investigated acute responses in lung function following controlled exposures to cookstove-generated air pollution. Methods: We recruited 48 healthy adult volunteers to undergo six two-hour treatments: a filtered-air control and emissions from five different stoves with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) targets from 10 to 500 µg/m3. Spirometry was conducted prior to exposure and immediately, and three and 24 h post-exposure. Mixed-effect models were used to estimate differences in post-exposure lung function for stove treatments versus control. Results: Immediately post-exposure, lung function was lower compared to the control for the three highest PM2.5-level stoves. The largest differences were for the fan rocket stove (target 250 µg/m3; forced vital capacity (FVC): -60 mL, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -135, 15; forced expiratory volume (FEV1): -51 mL, 95% CI -117, 16; mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75): -116 mL/s, 95% CI -239, 8). At 3 h post-exposure, lung function was lower compared to the control for all stove treatments; effects were of similar magnitude for all stoves. At 24 h post-exposure, results were consistent with a null association for FVC and FEV1; FEF25-75 was lower relative to the control for the gasifier, fan rocket, and three stone fire.Conclusions: Patterns suggesting short-term decreases in lung function follow from exposure to cookstove air pollution even for stove exposures with low PM2.5 levels.
Entities:
Keywords:
Air pollution; FEV1; FVC; controlled exposure; cookstoves; spirometry
Authors: Justino Regalado; Rogelio Pérez-Padilla; Raúl Sansores; José Ignacio Páramo Ramirez; Michael Brauer; Peter Paré; Sverre Vedal Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kelsey R Bilsback; Sarah R Eilenberg; Nicholas Good; Lauren Heck; Michael Johnson; John K Kodros; Eric M Lipsky; Christian L'Orange; Jeffrey R Pierce; Allen L Robinson; R Subramanian; Jessica Tryner; Ander Wilson; John Volckens Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Miranda R Jones; Ana V Diez-Roux; Marie S O'Neill; Eliseo Guallar; A Richey Sharrett; Wendy Post; Joel D Kaufman; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Seppo T Rinne; Edgar J Rodas; Brooke S Bender; Mikael L Rinne; Joshua M Simpson; Regina Galer-Unti; Larry T Glickman Journal: Respir Med Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Tone Smith-Sivertsen; Esperanza Díaz; Dan Pope; Rolv T Lie; Anaite Díaz; John McCracken; Per Bakke; Byron Arana; Kirk R Smith; Nigel Bruce Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Daniel Pope; Esperanza Diaz; Tone Smith-Sivertsen; Rolv T Lie; Per Bakke; John R Balmes; Kirk R Smith; Nigel G Bruce Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kristen M Fedak; Nicholas Good; Ethan S Walker; John Balmes; Robert D Brook; Maggie L Clark; Tom Cole-Hunter; Robert Devlin; Christian L'Orange; Gary Luckasen; John Mehaffy; Rhiannon Shelton; Ander Wilson; John Volckens; Jennifer L Peel Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: John Volckens; Kristen M Good; Dan Goble; Nicholas Good; Joshua P Keller; Amy Keisling; Christian L'Orange; Emily Morton; Rebecca Phillips; Ky Tanner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Julie D White; Annah B Wyss; Thanh T Hoang; Mikyeong Lee; Marie Richards; Christine G Parks; Laura E Beane-Freeman; John L Hankinson; David M Umbach; Stephanie J London Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 11.035
Authors: Hans Orru; Henrik Olstrup; Jaakko Kukkonen; Susana López-Aparicio; David Segersson; Camilla Geels; Tanel Tamm; Kari Riikonen; Androniki Maragkidou; Torben Sigsgaard; Jørgen Brandt; Henrik Grythe; Bertil Forsberg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 4.135