Literature DB >> 32297108

Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries.

Mahmood Ahmad1, Ping Jiang2, Abdul Majeed2, Muhammad Yousaf Raza3.   

Abstract

This study examines the effect of financial development (FD) and foreign direct investment (FDI) on the environmental quality for the panel of 90 belt and road countries from 1990 to 2017. This study advances the knowledge of financial development by using the new comprehensive index, which is based on access, depth, and efficiency of financial markets and financial institutions and incorporated foreign direct investment as an important determinant of environmental quality. By applying the Driscoll-Kraay standard error pooled ordinary least square method, the empirical findings reveal that FD deteriorates the environmental quality by increasing the CO2 emissions, while FDI improves environmental quality and the relationship between economic growth (EG) and CO2 emissions is inverted U-shaped, i.e., presence of EKC hypothesis. The energy consumption and urbanization pollute the environment, while trade openness enhances the quality of the environment. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) panel causality test result confirms that the bidirectional causality exists among FD, trade openness, energy consumption, and urbanization with CO2 emissions. The empirical results provide new insights for policymakers and also have several implications for the betterment of environmental quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belt and road countries; CO2 emissions; EKC; FDI; Financial development; Panel regression estimators

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32297108     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  4 in total

1.  Roles of natural resources, globalization, and technological innovations in mitigation of environmental degradation in BRI economies.

Authors:  Abdul Majeed; Chengang Ye; Ye Chenyun; Xu Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies.

Authors:  Siming Zuo; Mingxia Zhu; Zhexiao Xu; Judit Oláh; Zoltan Lakner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Primal-dual approach to environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A demand and supply side analyses of environmental degradation.

Authors:  Gildas Dohba Dinga; Dobdinga Cletus Fonchamnyo; Elvis Dze Achuo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Do energy consumption and environmental quality enhance subjective wellbeing in G20 countries?

Authors:  Neha Kumari; Pushp Kumar; Naresh Chandra Sahu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.