Literature DB >> 322969

Cytochemical and ultrastructural studies on the synaptonemal complex of rat spermatocytes.

A J Dumontier, W F Sheridan.   

Abstract

The effects of several dehydration treatments on the synaptonemal complex (SC), histone solubility in 2.0 M NaCl, and histone-DNA interaction in unfixed rat spermatocytes were evaluated. Freeze substitution with ethanol or dehydration with polyethylene glygol resulted in loss of the SC, preservation of histone solubility and DNA-histone salt linkages. Dehydration with ethylene gylcol or hexylene glycol resulted in preservation of SC with a clear delineation of attachment of the chromatin fibrils to the lateral elements, but a loss of histone solubility and histone-DNA linkages. Dehydration to a fifty percent concentration with glycerol with completion of dehydration with ethylene glycol had the same effect but also resulted in an even distribution of chromatin fibrils. Dehydration with glycerol alone resulted in clumping of chromatin and loss of SC structure, histone solubility and histone-DNA linkages. Partial dehydration to a fifty percent concentration with these three solvents followed by freeze substitution with ethanol resulted in the loss of SC structure and histone solubility but the preservation of histone-DNA linkages. It is likely that these nonaqueous solvents affected the histone hydrophobic groups and thereby altered histone conformation and interactions. These alterations, depending on the treatment used, resulted in the loss or preservation of SC, histone solubility and histone-DNA interactions thereby indicating that the hydrophobic interactions of the histones are crucial for the preservation of these feature of meiotic chromosomes. These results also demonstrate that neither does the preservation of the histone-DNA salt linkages suffice for the preservation of the SC nor does their disruption necessarily result in its loss. The lysine-rich histones, particularly that one unique to meiotic cells, may through their interactions play a crucial role in SC structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 322969     DOI: 10.1007/bf00330413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  25 in total

Review 1.  Histones, chromatin structure, and control of cell division.

Authors:  E M Bradbury
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  An unusual pattern of lysine rich histone components is associated with spermatogenesis in rat testis.

Authors:  W S Kistler; M E Geroch
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1975-03-17       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Effects of age and hypophysectomy upon relative proportions of various histones in rat testis.

Authors:  S R Grimes; C B Chae; J L Irvin
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1975-01-02       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  An icesolvent method of drying frozen tissue for plant cytology.

Authors:  P S WOODS; A W POLLISTER
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1955-05

5.  A Selective Staining Method for the Basic Proteins of Cell Nuclei.

Authors:  M Alfert; I I Geschwind
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1953-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chromatin structure; oligomers of the histones.

Authors:  R D Kornberg; J O Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Simple computer-aided approach for the analyses of the nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectra of histones. Fractions F1, Fsa1, F2B, cleaved halves of F2B and F2B-DNA.

Authors:  E M Bradbury; H W Rattle
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1972-05-23

Review 8.  A model for chromatin structure.

Authors:  H J Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Histones of meiosis.

Authors:  W F Sheridan; H Stern
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  DNA denaturation in situ. Effect of divalent cations and alcohols.

Authors:  Z Darzynkiewicz; F Traganos; T Sharpless; M R Melamed
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.