Jiao Gong1, Jingyi Ou2, Xueping Qiu3, Yusheng Jie4,5, Yaqiong Chen1, Lianxiong Yuan6, Jing Cao4, Mingkai Tan2, Wenxiong Xu4, Fang Zheng3, Yaling Shi2, Bo Hu1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 3. Center for Gene Diagnosis, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Liver Disease of Guangdong Province, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Yuedong Hospital, Meizhou, People's Republic of China. 6. Department of Science and Research, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because there is no reliable risk stratification tool for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients at admission, we aimed to construct an effective model for early identification of cases at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 372 hospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID-19 were followed for > 15 days after admission. Patients who deteriorated to severe or critical COVID-19 and those who maintained a nonsevere state were assigned to the severe and nonsevere groups, respectively. Based on baseline data of the 2 groups, we constructed a risk prediction nomogram for severe COVID-19 and evaluated its performance. RESULTS: The training cohort consisted of 189 patients, and the 2 independent validation cohorts consisted of 165 and 18 patients. Among all cases, 72 (19.4%) patients developed severe COVID-19. Older age; higher serum lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, coefficient of variation of red blood cell distribution width, blood urea nitrogen, and direct bilirubin; and lower albumin were associated with severe COVID-19. We generated the nomogram for early identifying severe COVID-19 in the training cohort (area under the curve [AUC], 0.912 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .846-.978]; sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 87.6%) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.853 [95% CI, .790-.916]; sensitivity 77.5%, specificity 78.4%). The calibration curve for probability of severe COVID-19 showed optimal agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Decision curve and clinical impact curve analyses indicated that nomogram conferred high clinical net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram could help clinicians with early identification of patients who will progress to severe COVID-19, which will enable better centralized management and early treatment of severe disease.
BACKGROUND: Because there is no reliable risk stratification tool for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients at admission, we aimed to construct an effective model for early identification of cases at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 372 hospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID-19 were followed for > 15 days after admission. Patients who deteriorated to severe or critical COVID-19 and those who maintained a nonsevere state were assigned to the severe and nonsevere groups, respectively. Based on baseline data of the 2 groups, we constructed a risk prediction nomogram for severe COVID-19 and evaluated its performance. RESULTS: The training cohort consisted of 189 patients, and the 2 independent validation cohorts consisted of 165 and 18 patients. Among all cases, 72 (19.4%) patients developed severe COVID-19. Older age; higher serum lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, coefficient of variation of red blood cell distribution width, blood ureanitrogen, and direct bilirubin; and lower albumin were associated with severe COVID-19. We generated the nomogram for early identifying severe COVID-19 in the training cohort (area under the curve [AUC], 0.912 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .846-.978]; sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 87.6%) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.853 [95% CI, .790-.916]; sensitivity 77.5%, specificity 78.4%). The calibration curve for probability of severe COVID-19 showed optimal agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Decision curve and clinical impact curve analyses indicated that nomogram conferred high clinical net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram could help clinicians with early identification of patients who will progress to severe COVID-19, which will enable better centralized management and early treatment of severe disease.
Authors: Tawsifur Rahman; Amith Khandakar; Md Enamul Hoque; Nabil Ibtehaz; Saad Bin Kashem; Reehum Masud; Lutfunnahar Shampa; Mohammad Mehedi Hasan; Mohammad Tariqul Islam; Somaya Al-Maadeed; Susu M Zughaier; Saif Badran; Suhail A R Doi; Muhammad E H Chowdhury Journal: IEEE Access Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Pataje G Prasanna; Gayle E Woloschak; Andrea L DiCarlo; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Dörthe Schaue; Arnab Chakravarti; Francis A Cucinotta; Silvia C Formenti; Chandan Guha; Dale J Hu; Mohammad K Khan; David G Kirsch; Sunil Krishnan; Wolfgang W Leitner; Brian Marples; William McBride; Minesh P Mehta; Shahin Rafii; Elad Sharon; Julie M Sullivan; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Mansoor M Ahmed; Bhadrasain Vikram; C Norman Coleman; Kathryn D Held Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Laura A Vella; Josephine R Giles; Amy E Baxter; Derek A Oldridge; Caroline Diorio; Leticia Kuri-Cervantes; Cécile Alanio; M Betina Pampena; Jennifer E Wu; Zeyu Chen; Yinghui Jane Huang; Elizabeth M Anderson; Sigrid Gouma; Kevin O McNerney; Julie Chase; Chakkapong Burudpakdee; Jessica H Lee; Sokratis A Apostolidis; Alexander C Huang; Divij Mathew; Oliva Kuthuru; Eileen C Goodwin; Madison E Weirick; Marcus J Bolton; Claudia P Arevalo; Andre Ramos; C J Jasen; Peyton E Conrey; Samir Sayed; Heather M Giannini; Kurt D'Andrea; Nuala J Meyer; Edward M Behrens; Hamid Bassiri; Scott E Hensley; Sarah E Henrickson; David T Teachey; Michael R Betts; E John Wherry Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2021-03-02
Authors: Xiaohua Liao; Xin Lv; Cheng Song; Mao Jiang; Ronglin He; Yuanyuan Han; Mengyu Li; Yan Zhang; Yupeng Jiang; Jie Meng Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-04-26
Authors: Ania Syrowatka; Masha Kuznetsova; Ava Alsubai; Adam L Beckman; Paul A Bain; Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; Jianying Hu; Gretchen Purcell Jackson; Kyu Rhee; David W Bates Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2021-06-10