| Literature DB >> 32296693 |
Yuyin Yang1, Tianli Tong1, Jianfei Chen1, Yong Liu2, Shuguang Xie1.
Abstract
Lacustrine ecosystems are regarded as one of the important natural sources of greenhouse gas methane. Aerobic methane oxidation, carried out by methane-oxidizing bacteria, is a key process regulating methane emission. And ammonium is believed to greatly influence aerobic methane oxidation activity. To date, disagreement exists in the threshold of ammonium effect. Moreover, knowledge about how aerobic methanotrophic community composition and functional gene transcription respond to ammonium is still lacking. In the present study, microcosms with freshwater lake sediment were constructed to explore the effect of ammonium level on aerobic methanotrophs. Methane oxidation potential, and the density, diversity and composition of pmoA gene and its transcripts were examined during 2-week incubation. A negative impact of ammonium on aerobic methane oxidation potential and a positive impact on pmoA gene density were observed only at a very high level of ammonium. However, pmoA gene transcription increased notably at all ammonium levels. The composition of functional pmoA gene and transcripts were also influenced by ammonium. But a great shift was only observed in pmoA transcripts at the highest ammonium level.Entities:
Keywords: ammonium; freshwater lake; methane oxidation; methanotroph; pmoA gene; pmoA transcripts
Year: 2020 PMID: 32296693 PMCID: PMC7137091 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 3Phylogenetic tree of obtained pmoA sequences and reference sequences from the GenBank database. The predicted cut sites were shown after the accession numbers of sequences. The dots at branches represent the support values from bootstrap test. Branch support values of no less than 50 were dotted. The bar represents 1% sequence divergence based on neighbor-joining algorithm.
FIGURE 1Change of methane oxidation potential in the microcosms with different treatments. Error bar indicates standard deviation (n = 3). Asterisk indicates the significance between experiment group and control group (P < 0.05). ‘ns’ indicates no significant difference among treatments at a given time.
FIGURE 2Changes of pmoA gene (A) and transcript (B) abundance in the microcosms with different treatments. Error bar indicates standard deviation (n = 3). Asterisk indicates the significance between experiment group and control group (P < 0.05). ‘ns’ indicates no significant difference among treatments at a given time.
Numbers of T-RFs and T-RF-based Shannon diversity.
| Sample | DNA | RNA | ||
| T-RFs | Shannon | T-RFs | Shannon | |
| A1 | 11 | 1.55 | 23 | 2.55 |
| B1 | 11 | 1.55 | 23 | 2.23 |
| C1 | 11 | 1.49 | 22 | 2.17 |
| D1 | 11 | 1.27 | 14 | 1.70 |
| E1 | 11 | 1.48 | 20 | 2.12 |
| F1 | 12 | 1.66 | 25 | 2.55 |
| A7 | 12 | 1.74 | 28 | 2.92 |
| B7 | 12 | 1.80 | 32 | 3.09 |
| C7 | 13 | 1.77 | 27 | 2.86 |
| D7 | 12 | 1.79 | 18 | 2.46 |
| E7 | 14 | 1.89 | 30 | 2.98 |
| F7 | 13 | 1.70 | 24 | 2.70 |
| A14 | 13 | 1.70 | 36 | 3.17 |
| B14 | 12 | 1.79 | 38 | 3.09 |
| C14 | 12 | 1.83 | 33 | 2.96 |
| D14 | 12 | 1.87 | 34 | 3.08 |
| E14 | 12 | 1.83 | 32 | 2.89 |
| F14 | 12 | 1.79 | 20 | 2.18 |
FIGURE 4T-RFLP profiles based on pmoA gene (A) and transcripts (B). For sample name, upper case letters refer to treatment while digits indicate sampling time.
FIGURE 5pmoA gene (A) and transcripts (B)-based cluster diagrams of similarity values for samples with different treatments. Dissimilarity levels are indicated above the diagram. For sample name, upper case letters refer to treatment while digits indicate sampling time.