Literature DB >> 32296041

The identification of a CD47-blocking "hotspot" and design of a CD47/PD-L1 dual-specific antibody with limited hemagglutination.

Rui Shi1,2, Yan Chai3, Jianhua Zhu4, Jinghua Yan5,6,7,8, Xiaomin Duan1,2, Xiaoshan Bi1,9, Qingrui Huang1, Qihui Wang1, Shuguang Tan3, George F Gao2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32296041      PMCID: PMC7058617          DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-0121-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther        ISSN: 2059-3635


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, By targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has achieved unprecedented clinical success in the treatment of multiple tumors.[1,2] Cancer cells evade the host immune system via both the tolerance of T cells and functional suppression of innate immune cells.[3] CD47 provides a “do not eat me” signal by binding to signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) to prevent innate immune cells from attacking host cells.[4] Recently, macrophages were found to restore antitumor reactivity by blocking the interaction between upregulated CD47 on tumor cells and SIRPα on innate immune cells.[5] However, it remains unknown whether there are blocking “hotspots” on CD47 for mAb-based anti-CD47 therapy or additional blocking hotspot regions within CD47 for therapeutic mAb development. Although it is overexpressed on tumor cells, CD47 is also expressed in many normal cells, including red blood cells and platelets.[6] Some validated CD47-blocking mAbs under clinical investigation induce hemagglutination and anemia.[7] Thus, designing an engineered CD47-blocking antibody to exert a therapeutic effect with limited hemagglutination is needed. To overcome this obstacle, we identified a CD47-targeting mAb and evaluated its enhanced macrophage-mediated phagocytosis capacity and tumor suppression efficacy. We screened a panel of 50 murine mAbs from mice immunized with human CD47 and identified an efficient CD47/SIRPα-blocking mAb, m4C1 (Fig. S1a). m4C1 was subsequently humanized based on sequence homology and computational prediction (Fig. S1c). Humanized 4C1 (h4C1) blocked the CD47/SIRPα interaction as efficiently as m4C1 (Fig. S1e). Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-binding assays demonstrated that h4C1 bound to the human CD47-ECD antigen with a KD of 0.85 nM (Fig. S1d), which is comparable to that of m4C1 (Fig. S1b, Table S1). To investigate the macrophage-mediated phagocytosis activity of h4C1, a tumor cell phagocytosis assay was conducted with bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). We found that h4C1 exhibited significant phagocytosis in Raji cells, with an EC50 of 7.30 ng/mL (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

The FG loop of CD47 as a blocking hotspot, and the construction of a CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody with no hemagglutination.

a The EC50 (7.30 ng/mL) of h4C1 was calculated by fitting the phagocytosis index of Raji cells from a serially diluted antibody to a sigmoidal dose–response curve. Bars represent the mean ± SD, and the statistical significance was analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons; ns, not significant, *p < 0.05 and ****p < 0.0001. The data presented here are representative of three independent experimental results. b Three groups of mice were enrolled with nine mice in each group. Treatment with an isotype IgG was used as a negative control, and Hu5F9 was used as a positive control. Representative bioluminescence images of Raji tumors at Days 7 and 28 post-tumor inoculation are presented. c Comparative analysis of average luciferase radiances in each treatment group (n = 9). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test compared to the isotype IgG treatment group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001). d Superimposition of the h4C1/CD47 complex and SIRPα/CD47 (PDB ID: 2JJS) reveals the stereospecific competition between h4C1 and SIRPα. The CD47-ECD/h4C1 structure superimposed on CD47-ECD/SIRPα demonstrates stereo-specific hindrance. CD47-ECD is shown as a cartoon with a translucent surface (yellow). The FG loop on the CD47-ECD surface is in purple. e Comparison of the FG loop of the CD47-ECDs from the complex structures. Binding details of the FG loop of CD47 with SIRPα. Residues interacting between the FG loop on CD47-ECD and the antibody h4C1, Hu5F9, B6H12.2, and C47B222. CD47-ECD is shown as a cartoon in yellow, and the FG loop is in purple for emphasis. h4C1 is displayed as a cartoon in olive green; all other blocking agents are also in olive green or cyan. Residues involved in hydrogen bond interactions are shown as sticks, and the hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed blue lines. f Schematic of the CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting BsAb. h4C1 (black) is linked with the variable domains from anti-PD-L1 #18 (blue). Constant regions are the human IgG4 isotype (white). g The CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody can block both the CD47/SIPRα and PD-1/PD-L1 interactions in a flow cytometry-based assay. SIRPα or PD-1 was transiently expressed on the HEK 293T cell surface with GFP, and SIPRα-expressing or PD-1-expressing HEK 293T cells were stained with CD47-ECD or PD-L1-ECD proteins, which were preincubated with an isotype IgG or a dual-targeting antibody. h Binding characteristics of the CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody. Antibodies were immobilized on the chip, while serial dilutions of the antigen were then flowed over the surface of the chip. The binding affinities (KD) are labeled accordingly. i The CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody with limited hemagglutination. Antibodies were triple gradient dilutions from 2 mg/mL to 11.3 ng/mL. Then, equal volumes of antibodies and human RBCs were mixed. Hemagglutination was defined as red or brown flocculation in the supernatant. Compared to h4C1, the CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody displays no hemagglutination.

The FG loop of CD47 as a blocking hotspot, and the construction of a CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody with no hemagglutination.

a The EC50 (7.30 ng/mL) of h4C1 was calculated by fitting the phagocytosis index of Raji cells from a serially diluted antibody to a sigmoidal dose–response curve. Bars represent the mean ± SD, and the statistical significance was analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons; ns, not significant, *p < 0.05 and ****p < 0.0001. The data presented here are representative of three independent experimental results. b Three groups of mice were enrolled with nine mice in each group. Treatment with an isotype IgG was used as a negative control, and Hu5F9 was used as a positive control. Representative bioluminescence images of Raji tumors at Days 7 and 28 post-tumor inoculation are presented. c Comparative analysis of average luciferase radiances in each treatment group (n = 9). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test compared to the isotype IgG treatment group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001). d Superimposition of the h4C1/CD47 complex and SIRPα/CD47 (PDB ID: 2JJS) reveals the stereospecific competition between h4C1 and SIRPα. The CD47-ECD/h4C1 structure superimposed on CD47-ECD/SIRPα demonstrates stereo-specific hindrance. CD47-ECD is shown as a cartoon with a translucent surface (yellow). The FG loop on the CD47-ECD surface is in purple. e Comparison of the FG loop of the CD47-ECDs from the complex structures. Binding details of the FG loop of CD47 with SIRPα. Residues interacting between the FG loop on CD47-ECD and the antibody h4C1, Hu5F9, B6H12.2, and C47B222. CD47-ECD is shown as a cartoon in yellow, and the FG loop is in purple for emphasis. h4C1 is displayed as a cartoon in olive green; all other blocking agents are also in olive green or cyan. Residues involved in hydrogen bond interactions are shown as sticks, and the hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed blue lines. f Schematic of the CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting BsAb. h4C1 (black) is linked with the variable domains from anti-PD-L1 #18 (blue). Constant regions are the human IgG4 isotype (white). g The CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody can block both the CD47/SIPRα and PD-1/PD-L1 interactions in a flow cytometry-based assay. SIRPα or PD-1 was transiently expressed on the HEK 293T cell surface with GFP, and SIPRα-expressing or PD-1-expressing HEK 293T cells were stained with CD47-ECD or PD-L1-ECD proteins, which were preincubated with an isotype IgG or a dual-targeting antibody. h Binding characteristics of the CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody. Antibodies were immobilized on the chip, while serial dilutions of the antigen were then flowed over the surface of the chip. The binding affinities (KD) are labeled accordingly. i The CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody with limited hemagglutination. Antibodies were triple gradient dilutions from 2 mg/mL to 11.3 ng/mL. Then, equal volumes of antibodies and human RBCs were mixed. Hemagglutination was defined as red or brown flocculation in the supernatant. Compared to h4C1, the CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting antibody displays no hemagglutination. We further assessed the in vivo tumor suppression efficacy of the CD47-targeting antibody, h4C1, in a mouse model. We subcutaneously engrafted luciferase-labeled Raji cells into the backs of immune-compromised NCG mice. Seven days after the engraftment, the mice were administered h4C1, Hu5F9 (a validated CD47-blocking mAb under clinical investigation[7]), or isotype control mAb daily for 2 weeks (Fig. S2a). The average luciferase intensity in the h4C1-treated group was significantly lower than that of the isotype mAb-treated group (Figs. 1b, c and S2b–d). Treatment with h4C1 also resulted in a substantially improved survival of the tumor-bearing mice (Fig. S2e). Taken together, these results suggest that h4C1 represents a potential therapeutic mAb for lymphoma. The binding characteristics of h4C1 to CD47 were subsequently explored through the determination of the h4C1/CD47 complex structure (Fig. S3a, b, Table S2). The overall structure reveals that h4C1 binds to CD47 with a buried surface area of 688 Å2. All three CDRs of heavy chain (VH) and LCDR2 provide contacts with CD47-ECD, while LCDR1 and LCDR3 are not engaged (Fig. S4). The findings indicate that h4C1 exhibits a VH-dominated interaction with CD47, while the binding of h4C1 is mainly located on three loops of CD47 (FG, BC, and C’C”). To analyze the mechanism of CD47 antagonism by h4C1, the structure of the h4C1-Fab/CD47-ECD complex was superimposed onto the CD47-ECD/SIRPα complex (PDB ID: 2JJS). Detailed comparison of reciprocal binding areas between the two complexes revealed multiple striking parallels. Specifically, the FG loop of CD47-ECD inserts into a groove on the surface of domain I of SIRPα and contributes more than half of the interfacial surface.[4] Similarly, the FG loop of CD47-ECD dominates the interaction with VH of h4C1. The binding of h4C1 to CD47 displayed substantial stereospecific hindrance to the binding of h4C1 to SIPRα (Fig. 1d). There are five potential N-linked glycosylation sites on CD47-ECD. In the complex structure of h4C1/CD47, glycosylation modifications were observed at all five of these sites in CD47 (Fig. S5a). Notably, the glycan chain on N32 substantially stretches toward the h4C1/CD47 interface and contacts h4C1 (Table S3 and Fig. S3c). Additionally, glycosylated N55 is also near the h4C1/CD47 interface. The binding profiles of h4C1 to N32A-mutated or N55A-mutated CD47 proteins were further analyzed with SPR to investigate the glycosylation dependency of the h4C1/CD47 interaction. SDS–PAGE analysis revealed that N32A-mutated or N55A-mutated CD47 proteins with a reduction in molecular weight indicates the existence of the N-glycosylation modification at these sites (Fig. S3d). The SPR assays demonstrated that no substantial differences were observed in the binding affinity of WT CD47-ECD (Fig. S1d) and N32A-mutated or N55A-mutated CD47-ECD (Fig. S5b, c). Therefore, the binding of h4C1 to CD47 is not affected by glycosylation modifications of CD47. Several reported complex structures of CD47-blocking agents enabled us to compare these binding characteristics and to elucidate sites for preferential blocking. Overall, these mAbs mainly bind to the FG loop of CD47, and the conformation of the FG loop displayed no substantial differences, indicating the structural conservation of the loop (Fig. 1e). In particular, the FG loop of CD47 dominates the binding to SIPRα and to all of the mAbs. The binding of Hu5F9 to the FG loop of CD47 is mainly mediated by HCDR1, HCDR3, LCDR1, and LCDR2. The complex structure of CD47 and a murine mAb that showed potential tumor suppression efficacy,[8] B6H12.2, also exhibited FG loop-dominated binding to the mAb. The complex structure of C47B222/CD47 shows that the FG loop of CD47 also plays a critical role in binding to C47B222 (Fig. 1e). Therefore, the FG loop of CD47 dominates the interactions with these mAbs and could serve as a blocking “hotspot” for the design of next-generation anti-CD47 drugs in the future. To reduce the hemagglutination of CD47-targeting mAb, we constructed a bispecific antibody (BsAb) in a dual-variable-domain immunoglobulin (DVD-Ig) format, and this antibody was expected to reduce the binding affinity to CD47. We introduced the variable domains from a validated PD-L1-targeting mAb #18 (CN Patent: 201810952740.3) onto h4C1 to enhance both innate and adaptive antitumor immune responses (Fig. 1f). A cell-based blocking assay showed that the BsAb maintained the blocking efficacy for both the CD47/SIRPα and PD-1/PD-L1 interactions (Fig. 1g). SPR was used to characterize the binding of the BsAb to PD-L1 or CD47, and a substantially reduced binding affinity was observed between BsAb and CD47; however, the binding affinity remained comparable to the binding of PD-L1 (Fig. 1h). Furthermore, a hemagglutination assay revealed that compared to h4C1 mAb, the CD47/PD-L1 BsAb exhibited substantially reduced hemagglutination in a wide range of concentrations in vitro (Fig. 1i). Therefore, the DVD-Ig CD47/PD-L1 BsAb design was able to maintain the blocking efficacy and reduce hemagglutination. Future investigations into the antitumor efficacy and hemagglutination should be conducted in a PD-L1-positive and CD47-positive mouse model. In summary, the CD47-specific h4C1 mAb, which displayed substantial tumor suppression efficacy, could serve as a promising agent for future clinical investigations. Complex structure comparative analysis indicates that the FG loop of CD47 may serve as a blocking hotspot for the innate immune checkpoint. Notably, compared with a single anti-CD47 molecule, DVD-Ig that targets CD20 and CD47 with a reduced affinity receives the equivalent benefits of tumor treatment in vivo.[9] The design of a CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting BsAb with limited hemagglutination provides insight into next-generation anti-CD47 drugs to improve tumor ICT. Supplemental Material Supplemental Material
  11 in total

Review 1.  CD47/SIRPα axis: bridging innate and adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Anneloes van Duijn; Sjoerd H Van der Burg; Ferenc A Scheeren
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 12.469

2.  Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutic Antibodies Targeting Functions of CD47 in the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Sukhbir Kaur; Kyle V Cicalese; Rajdeep Bannerjee; David D Roberts
Journal:  Antib Ther       Date:  2020-08-08

Review 3.  Progress of CD47 immune checkpoint blockade agents in anticancer therapy: a hematotoxic perspective.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Chen; Wei Shi; Jia-Jie Shi; Jin-Jian Lu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Predictors associated with clinical improvement of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Authors:  Takahiro Mitsumura; Tsukasa Okamoto; Tsuyoshi Shirai; Yuki Iijima; Rie Sakakibara; Takayuki Honda; Masahiro Ishizuka; Junichi Aiboshi; Tomoya Tateishi; Meiyo Tamaoka; Hidenobu Shigemitsu; Hirokuni Arai; Yasuhiro Otomo; Shuji Tohda; Tatsuhiko Anzai; Kunihiko Takahashi; Shinsuke Yasuda; Yasunari Miyazaki
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.211

Review 5.  ACE2: the molecular doorway to SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Miriam Marlene Medina-Enríquez; Sandra Lopez-León; José Alberto Carlos-Escalante; Zuleika Aponte-Torres; Angelica Cuapio; Talia Wegman-Ostrosky
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 7.133

6.  DSP107 combines inhibition of CD47/SIRPα axis with activation of 4-1BB to trigger anticancer immunity.

Authors:  Ewa Cendrowicz; Lisa Jacob; Shirley Greenwald; Ami Tamir; Iris Pecker; Rinat Tabakman; Lucy Ghantous; Liat Tamir; Roy Kahn; Jasmine Avichzer; Alexandra Aronin; Shira Amsili; Elina Zorde-Khvalevsky; Yosi Gozlan; Martijn Vlaming; Gerwin Huls; Tom van Meerten; Michal Elhalel Dranitzki; Adam Foley-Comer; Yaron Pereg; Amnon Peled; Ayelet Chajut; Edwin Bremer
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 7.  Role of CD47-SIRPα Checkpoint in Nanomedicine-Based Anti-Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Haiqin Liao; Chengcheng Niu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 8.  Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Cancer and Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Hans Raskov; Adile Orhan; Shruti Gaggar; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Tumor microenvironment in giant cell tumor of bone: evaluation of PD-L1 expression and SIRPα infiltration after denosumab treatment.

Authors:  Yu Toda; Kenichi Kohashi; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Shin Ishihara; Yoshihiro Ito; Yosuke Susuki; Kengo Kawaguchi; Daisuke Kiyozawa; Dai Takamatsu; Izumi Kinoshita; Yuichi Yamada; Junki Maehara; Atsushi Kimura; Sadafumi Tamiya; Kenichi Taguchi; Tomoya Matsunobu; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Yasuharu Nakashima; Masaaki Mawatari; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The Neutrophil: The Underdog That Packs a Punch in the Fight against Cancer.

Authors:  Natasha Ustyanovska Avtenyuk; Nienke Visser; Edwin Bremer; Valerie R Wiersma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.