Hui-Nan Yin1, Ji-Wei Hao2, Qi Chen1, Feng Li1, Song Yin3, Min Zhou4, Qing-Hong Zhang5, Yong-Ming Yao2, Jia-Ke Chai1. 1. Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 2. Trauma Repairment and Tissue Regeneration Center, Department of Medical Innovation Study, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Outpatient Service, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 4. Neurocritical Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China. 5. Trauma Repairment and Tissue Regeneration Center, Department of Medical Innovation Study, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: z_qinghong@aliyun.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although glucagon-like peptide 1 levels have been closely associated with inflammation and mortality in septic patients, the clinical importance of glucagon-like peptide 1 on hospital-acquired infections and long-term mortality after burn injury remains unexplored. METHODS: Plasma samples from 144 burn patients were collected on admission to determine total glucagon-like peptide 1, interleukin 6, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 levels. Hospital-acquired infections were determined by positive microbial culture. One-year mortality was assessed by telephone interview. Factors associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 were determined by multivariable linear logistic regression. Predicting the clinical importance of glucagon-like peptide 1 on the development of hospital-acquired infections and mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazards models and further by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to examine whether the mean glucagon-like peptide 1 level of the cohort could discriminate the hospital-acquired infections-free survival. RESULTS: Median burn size was 41% (19%-70%) of total body surface area. Hospital-acquired infections developed in 36 (25%) patients after a mean of 10 ± 1 days after injury. Interleukin 6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and blood urea nitrogen levels and thrombin time were independently associated with increased glucagon-like peptide 1 levels. Levels of glucagon-like peptide 1 (median, interquartile range) were greater in patients who developed hospital-acquired infections than in those who did not (237 pmol/L, 76-524 vs 80 pmol/L, 51-158; P < .001) and in patients who died (536 pmol/L, interquartile range: 336-891 pmol vs 98 pmol/L, 47-189; P < .001). Although the glucagon-like peptide 1 level could not predict hospital-acquired infections-free survival in individual patients, it could predict 1-year mortality independently (P = .021). Moreover, a glucagon-like peptide 1 level of 200 pmol/L could discriminate hospital-acquired infections-free survival (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Admission glucagon-like peptide 1 level can discriminate hospital-acquired infections-free survival and predict long-term mortality in a group of patients with burn injury. Our data suggests that glucagon-like peptide 1 may be a predictive biomarker for hospital-acquired infections and mortality in burn patients.
BACKGROUND: Although glucagon-like peptide 1 levels have been closely associated with inflammation and mortality in septic patients, the clinical importance of glucagon-like peptide 1 on hospital-acquired infections and long-term mortality after burn injury remains unexplored. METHODS: Plasma samples from 144 burn patients were collected on admission to determine total glucagon-like peptide 1, interleukin 6, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 levels. Hospital-acquired infections were determined by positive microbial culture. One-year mortality was assessed by telephone interview. Factors associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 were determined by multivariable linear logistic regression. Predicting the clinical importance of glucagon-like peptide 1 on the development of hospital-acquired infections and mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazards models and further by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to examine whether the mean glucagon-like peptide 1 level of the cohort could discriminate the hospital-acquired infections-free survival. RESULTS: Median burn size was 41% (19%-70%) of total body surface area. Hospital-acquired infections developed in 36 (25%) patients after a mean of 10 ± 1 days after injury. Interleukin 6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and blood ureanitrogen levels and thrombin time were independently associated with increased glucagon-like peptide 1 levels. Levels of glucagon-like peptide 1 (median, interquartile range) were greater in patients who developed hospital-acquired infections than in those who did not (237 pmol/L, 76-524 vs 80 pmol/L, 51-158; P < .001) and in patients who died (536 pmol/L, interquartile range: 336-891 pmol vs 98 pmol/L, 47-189; P < .001). Although the glucagon-like peptide 1 level could not predict hospital-acquired infections-free survival in individual patients, it could predict 1-year mortality independently (P = .021). Moreover, a glucagon-like peptide 1 level of 200 pmol/L could discriminate hospital-acquired infections-free survival (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Admission glucagon-like peptide 1 level can discriminate hospital-acquired infections-free survival and predict long-term mortality in a group of patients with burn injury. Our data suggests that glucagon-like peptide 1 may be a predictive biomarker for hospital-acquired infections and mortality in burn patients.