| Literature DB >> 32295528 |
Pengyu Zhao1, Xueyan Han1, Lili You1, Yu Zhao2, Li Yang1, Yuanli Liu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Chinese government introduced the maternal health services as part of the Basic Public Health Service (BPHS) project in 2009. While China has made progress in reducing maternal mortality, the longitudinal association between the utilization rate of the maternal health services of the BPHS project and such reduction was rarely evaluated with robust methods.Entities:
Keywords: Basic public health service; China; Maternal health management; Maternal mortality; Service utilization
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295528 PMCID: PMC7161293 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02900-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Maternal health services protocol specified in the BPHS project
| Service items | Ante-natal Services | Postnatal services | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st trimester | 2nd trimester | 3rd trimester | 7 days postpartum | 42 days postpartum | |
| Number of visits | |||||
| Minimum number of visits | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Required services | |||||
| Inspection on family history | √ | ||||
| Inspection on previous diseases | √ | ||||
| Gynecologic examinations | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Routine blood test | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Blood pressure | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Routine urine test | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Liver function tests | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Kidney function tests | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Hepatitis B examinations | √ | √ | |||
| Syphilis test and treatment | √ | √ | |||
| HIV test and counselling | √ | √ | |||
| Establishment of maternal health record | √ | ||||
| Guidance of lifestyle, nutrition and mental health | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Health education on spontaneous labor | √ | ||||
| Health education on breast feeding | √ | √ | |||
| Neonatal care instructions | √ | √ | |||
Notes: This table summarized the requirements in the Maternal Health Care Specification issued by People’s Republic of China [24]
Fig. 1The variations and trend changes of provincial service utilization rate from 2009 to 2016
Fig. 2The variations and trend changes of provincial MMR from 2009 to 2016
The provincial variation of the variables from 2009 to 2016
| Variable | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMR | 7.02–232.23 | 6.24–174.78 | 6.00–180.74 | 4.01–176.12 | 4.99–154.51 | 4.65–108.86 | 4.65–100.92 | 4.47–109.9 |
| Utilization rate | 33.33–96.33 | 32.2–98.00 | 30.7–99.90 | 38.20–100.00 | 44.20–100.00 | 49.60–100.00 | 71.00–100.00 | 74.40–100.00 |
| Service fee per capita | 10.00–58.00 | 15.00–67.00 | 20.00–95.00 | 25.00–101.00 | 30.00–110.00 | 35.00–117.00 | 40.00–136.00 | 45.00–131.00 |
| Doctors per thousand population | 0.81–4.70 | 0.83–4.90 | 0.86–5.11 | 0.94–3.37 | 1.03–5.50 | 1.25–3.50 | 1.40–3.70 | 1.40–3.90 |
| Urban-rural doctor ratio | 1.51–4.55 | 1.33–6.53 | 1.33–6.55 | 1.37–5.42 | 1.48–5.90 | 1.49–5.73 | 1.59–5.86 | 1.06–5.91 |
| Nurses per thousand population | 0.69–4.95 | 0.68–5.34 | 0.71–5.68 | 0.56–3.84 | 0.76–6.36 | 0.85–4.11 | 1.00–4.40 | 1.20–4.50 |
| Urban-rural nurse ratio | 2.07–8.22 | 2.01–11.66 | 2.05–10.11 | 1.83–8.32 | 1.84–10.62 | 2.20–8.39 | 2.16–7.82 | 1.64–8.27 |
| Inpatient beds per thousand population | 2.22–6.80 | 2.33–6.80 | 2.77–7.55 | 2.72–5.89 | 3.53–6.06 | 3.75–6.22 | 4.02–6.37 | 4.21–8.03 |
| Urban-rural inpatient beds ratio | 1.55–3.77 | 1.06–4.14 | 1.18–4.14 | 1.10–9.59 | 1.10–4.40 | 1.46–3.87 | 1.52–4.09 | 1.52–4.11 |
Notes: The data represent the ranges of the variables across provinces
Results of relationship between utilization rate and MMR based on the panel data models
| Variable | Fixed Effects Model | Random Effects Model | Pooled Effects Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | S.E | β | S.E | β | S.E | ||||
| Intercept | 65.74 | 9.24 | < 0.001 | 61.40 | 9.52 | < 0.001 | |||
| Utilization rate | −0.35 | 0.09 | < 0.001 | − 0.49 | 0.09 | < 0.001 | − 0.75 | 0.10 | < 0.001 |
| Service fee per capita | −0.30 | 0.08 | < 0.001 | −0.13 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
| Doctors per thousand population | −21.38 | 6.38 | < 0.001 | −9.49 | 5.79 | 0.10 | 13.92 | 5.11 | < 0.01 |
| Urban-rural doctor ratio | −11.69 | 6.45 | 0.052 | −9.83 | 2.51 | < 0.001 | 0.37 | 2.49 | 0.88 |
| Nurses per thousand population | 20.47 | 12.31 | 0.06 | 8.02 | 5.17 | 0.12 | −16.39 | 5.06 | < 0.01 |
| Urban-rural nurse ratio | 9.78 | 1.77 | < 0.001 | 12.23 | 1.77 | < 0.001 | 12.22 | 1.86 | < 0.001 |
| Inpatient beds per thousand population | −2.77 | 1.17 | 0.02 | −1.07 | 1.17 | 0.36 | 2.40 | 1.29 | 0.06 |
| Urban-rural inpatient beds ratio | −1.30 | 1.19 | 0.28 | −2.33 | 1.29 | 0.07 | −11.01 | 1.81 | < 0.001 |
| F statistics | 40.92 | 24.24 | 36.12 | ||||||
| Overall significance of model | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||||
Fixed effect panel stepwise regression models of utilization rate and MMR
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | β | β | β | |||||
| Utilization rate | −0.69 | < 0.001 | −0.50 | < 0.001 | −0.45 | < 0.001 | −0.35 | < 0.001 |
| Doctors per thousand population | −3.99 | 0.001 | −7.07 | 0.01 | −21.38 | < 0.001 | ||
| Nurses per thousand population | 1.58 | 0.73 | 8.50 | 0.053 | 20.47 | 0.06 | ||
| Inpatient beds per thousand population | −4.21 | < 0.001 | −3.10 | 0.01 | −2.77 | 0.02 | ||
| Urban-rural doctor ratio | −10.71 | 0.05 | −11.69 | 0.05 | ||||
| Urban-rural nurse ratio | 9.56 | < 0.001 | 9.78 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Urban-rural inpatient beds ratio | −1.80 | 0.13 | −1.30 | 0.28 | ||||
| Service fee per capita | −0.30 | < 0.001 | ||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.34 | ||||