Literature DB >> 32295509

Potential Embolic Sources and Outcomes in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in the NAVIGATE-ESUS Trial.

George Ntaios1, Lesly A Pearce2, Roland Veltkamp3,4, Mukul Sharma5, Scott E Kasner6, Eleni Korompoki3,7, Haralampos Milionis8, Hardi Mundl9, Scott D Berkowitz10, Stuart J Connolly11, Robert G Hart5.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Emboli in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) may originate from various potential embolic sources (PES), some of which may respond better to anticoagulation, whereas others to antiplatelets. We analyzed whether rivaroxaban is associated with reduction of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin in patients with ESUS across different PES and by number of PES. Methods- We assessed the presence/absence of each PES (atrial cardiopathy, atrial fibrillation, arterial atherosclerosis, left ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valvulopathy, patent foramen ovale, cancer) in NAVIGATE-ESUS (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial Versus ASA to Prevent Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) participants. Prevalence of each PES, as well as treatment effect and risk of event for each PES were determined. Results by number of PES were also determined. The outcomes were ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction. Results- In 7213 patients (38% women, mean age 67years) followed for a median of 11 months, the 3 most prevalent PES were atrial cardiopathy (37%), left ventricular disease (36%), and arterial atherosclerosis (29%). Forty-one percent of all patients had multiple PES, with 15% having ≥3 PES. None or a single PES was present in 23% and 36%, respectively. Recurrent ischemic stroke risk was similar for rivaroxaban- and aspirin-assigned patients for each PES, except for those with cardiac valvular disease which was marginally higher in rivaroxaban-assigned patients (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.0-3.0]). All-cause mortality risks were similar across treatment groups for each PES while too few myocardial infarctions and cardiovascular deaths occurred for meaningful assessment. Increasing number of PES was not associated with increased stroke recurrence nor all-cause mortality, and outcomes did not vary between rivaroxaban- and aspirin-assigned patients by number of PES. Conclusions- A large proportion of patients with ESUS had multiple PES which could explain the neutral results of NAVIGATE-ESUS. Recurrence rates between rivaroxaban- and aspirin-assigned patients were similar across the spectrum of PES. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02313909.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aspirin; atherosclerosis; atrial fibrillation; rivaroxaban; stroke

Year:  2020        PMID: 32295509     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  12 in total

1.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and its role in the investigation of stroke: an update.

Authors:  Ana Catarina Fonseca; José M Ferro; Ana G Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Navigating Antiplatelet Treatment Options for Stroke: Evidence-Based and Pragmatic Strategies.

Authors:  Bayan Moustafa; Fernando D Testai
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 6.030

Review 3.  Review and update of the concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Diener; J Donald Easton; Robert G Hart; Scott Kasner; Hooman Kamel; George Ntaios
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 44.711

4.  Association between Low Ankle-Brachial Index and Poor Outcomes in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Authors:  Minho Han; JoonNyung Heo; Jae Wook Jung; Il Hyung Lee; Joon Ho Kim; Hyungwoo Lee; Young Dae Kim; Hyo Suk Nam
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Potential Embolic Sources Differ in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source According to Age: A 15-Year Study.

Authors:  Yan Hou; Ahmed Elmashad; Ilene Staff; Mark Alberts; Amre Nouh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Atrial cardiopathy in embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Fenglian Gao; Wenhong Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  Promising Biomarker Candidates for Cardioembolic Stroke Etiology. A Brief Narrative Review and Current Opinion.

Authors:  Arnold Markus; Schütz Valerie; Katan Mira
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Impact of COVID-19 on Future Ischemic Stroke Incidence.

Authors:  Aisha Elfasi; Franklin D Echevarria; Robert Rodriguez; Yoram A Roman Casul; Anna Yuzefovich Khanna; Robert T Mankowski; Alexis N Simpkins
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 9.  Stroke Treatment in the Era of COVID-19: a Review.

Authors:  Marialaura Simonetto; Paul M Wechsler; Alexander E Merkler
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.972

Review 10.  Neuroinflammation and COVID-19 Ischemic Stroke Recovery-Evolving Evidence for the Mediating Roles of the ACE2/Angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas Receptor Axis and NLRP3 Inflammasome.

Authors:  Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir; Mohd K I Zolkefley; Muhammad Danial Ramli; Haziq Hazman Norman; Hafizah Abdul Hamid; Muzaimi Mustapha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.