| Literature DB >> 32295416 |
Giovanni Luigi De Maria1, Hector M Garcia-Garcia2, Roberto Scarsini1, Alexandre Hideo-Kajita2, Nieves Gonzalo López3, Antonio Maria Leone4, Giovanna Sarno5, Joost Daemen6, Evan Shlofmitz2, Allen Jeremias7, Matteo Tebaldi8, Hiram Grando Bezerra9, Shengxian Tu10, Pedro A Lemos11,12, Yuichi Ozaki2, Kazuhiro Dan2, Carlos Collet13, Adrian P Banning1, Emanuele Barbato14, Nils P Johnson15, Ron Waksman2.
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve is the current invasive gold standard for assessing the ischemic potential of an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis. Procedural cost and time, the need for coronary vessel instrumentation, and the need to administer adenosine to achieve maximal hyperemia remain integral components of invasive fractional flow reserve. The number of new alternatives to fractional flow reserve has proliferated over the last ten years using techniques ranging from alternative pressure wire metrics to anatomic simulation via angiography or intravascular imaging. This review article provides a critical description of the currently available or under-development alternatives to fractional flow reserve with a special focus on the available evidence, pros, and cons for each with a view towards their clinical application in the near future for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease.Entities:
Keywords: angiography; computed tomography; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; hyperemia; intravascular imaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295416 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv ISSN: 1941-7640 Impact factor: 6.546