| Literature DB >> 32295233 |
Abrham Wondimu1,2, Jurjen van der Schans2,3, Marinus van Hulst2,4, Maarten J Postma2,3,5,6.
Abstract
A previous study in Ethiopia reported significant variation in rotavirus vaccine uptake across socioeconomic strata. This study aims to quantify socioeconomic inequality of rotavirus vaccine uptake in Ethiopia and to identify the contributing factors for the inequality. The concentration curve (CC) and the Erreygers Normalized Concentration Index (ECI) were used to assess the socioeconomic related inequality in rotavirus vaccine uptake using data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Decomposition analysis was conducted to identify the drivers of inequalities. The CC for rotavirus vaccine uptake lay below the line of equality and the ECI was 0.270 (p < 0.001) indicating that uptake of rotavirus vaccine in Ethiopia was significantly concentrated among children from families with better socioeconomic status. The decomposition analysis showed that underlining inequalities in maternal health care services utilization, including antenatal care use (18.4%) and institutional delivery (8.1%), exposure to media (12.8%), and maternal educational level (9.7%) were responsible for the majority of observed inequalities in the uptake of rotavirus vaccine. The findings suggested that there is significant socioeconomic inequality in rotavirus vaccine uptake in Ethiopia. Multi-sectoral actions are required to reduce the inequalities, inclusive increasing maternal health care services, and educational attainments among economically disadvantaged mothers.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; concentration curve; concentration index; decomposition analysis; inequalities; rotavirus vaccine; uptake
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295233 PMCID: PMC7216179 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Hypothetical concentration curves for rotavirus vaccine uptake.
Characteristics of children aged 12–23 months by sex, residence place, region, and wealth index in Ethiopia (source: EDHS 2016; N ‡ = 2004).
| Variable | N ‡ (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex of child | |
| Male | 926 (46.2) |
| Female | 1078 (53.8) |
| Place of Residence | |
| Rural | 1772 (88.4) |
| Urban | 232 (11.6) |
| Region | |
| Established regions | 1821 (90.9) |
| Emerging regions | 122 (6.0) |
| Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa | 62 (3.1) |
| Wealth quintile * | |
| Poorest | 504 (25.2) |
| Poorer | 396 (19.8) |
| Middle | 450 (22.4) |
| Richer | 366 (18.3) |
| Richest | 288 (14.4) |
‡ Sampling weights were applied; * the wealth index is grouped into quintile.
Figure 2Distribution of rotavirus uptake among children aged 12–23 months in Ethiopia, 2016 EDHS (The error bar shows a 95% confidence interval).
Figure 3Concentration curve for rotavirus vaccine uptake among children aged 12–23 months in Ethiopia, 2016 EDHS.
Decomposition analysis of the Erreygers’ normalized concentration index for rotavirus vaccine uptake in Ethiopia.
| Determinant | Coefficient | CI | Contribution | % Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother’s age in years (reference is 20–34) | 0.1 | |||
| 15–19 | −0.021 (0.0904) | −0.018 (0.0029) *** | 0.000 (0.0000) *** | 0.1 (0.0131) *** |
| 35–49 | −0.001 (0.0438) | 0.009 (0.0011) *** | 0.000 (0.0000) * | 0.0 (0.0179) * |
| Maternal educational level (reference is no education) | 9.7 | |||
| Primary | 0.084 (0.0428) | 0.104 (0.0009) *** | 0.010 (0.0002) *** | 3.8 (0.0716) *** |
| Secondary and higher | 0.069 (0.0766) | 0.744 (0.0011) *** | 0.017 (0.0006) *** | 6.2 (0.2271) *** |
| Mother’s with employment status of working | −0.006 (0.0359) | 0.075 (0.0007) *** | −0.001 (0.0002) *** | −0.2 (0.0630) *** |
| Religion (reference is Orthodox) | 6.1 | |||
| Protestant | −0.065 (0.0448) | 0.102 (0.0012) *** | −0.006 (0.0002) *** | −2.3 (0.0646) *** |
| Muslim | −0.112 (0.0421) ** | −0.140 (0.0008) *** | 0.025 (0.0003) *** | 9.3 (0.1362) *** |
| Others | 0.035 (0.1077) | −0.446 (0.0034) *** | −0.002 (0.0002) *** | −0.8 (0.0990) *** |
| Administrative regions (reference is Established regions) | 3.8 | |||
| Emerging regions | −0.027 (0.0413) | −0.439 (0.0011) *** | 0.003 (0.0001) *** | 1.0 (0.0521) *** |
| Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa | 0.074 (0.0535) | 0.836 (0.0006) *** | 0.007 (0.0002) *** | 2.8 (0.0696) *** |
| Female child | 0.004 (0.0346) | 0.020 (0.0006) *** | 0.000 (0.0001) *** | 0.1 (0.0243) *** |
| Antenatal care use | 0.179 (0.0409) *** | 0.108 (0.0005) *** | 0.049 (0.0004) *** | 18.4 (0.1700) *** |
| Institutional delivery | 0.056 (0.0433) | 0.265 (0.0008) *** | 0.021 (0.0005) *** | 8.1 (0.2098) *** |
| Urban residence | 0.040 (0.0692) | 0.735 (0.0015) *** | 0.014 (0.0007) *** | 5.3 (0.2807) *** |
| Exposure to media | 0.090 (0.0528) | 0.510 (0.0012) *** | 0.034 (0.0007) *** | 12.8 (0.2540) *** |
| Postnatal care use | 0.099 (0.0551) | 0.308 (0.0015) *** | 0.010 (0.0002) *** | 3.7 (0.0708) *** |
| A mother not considered distance to a health facility as a big problem | 0.039 (0.0360) | 0.212 (0.0007) *** | 0.013 (0.0004) *** | 4.6 (0.1486) *** |
| Partner’s educational level (reference is no education) | 1.3 | |||
| Primary | 0.020 (0.0436) | 0.057 (0.0008) *** | 0.002 (0.0001) *** | 0.8 (0.0511) *** |
| Secondary and higher | 0.004 (0.0662) | 0.583 (0.0012) *** | 0.002 (0.0006) ** | 0.5 (0.2420) * |
| Residual | 0.410 (0.0533) *** | 25.9 | ||
| ECI decomposed | 0.270 (0.0012) *** | |||
CI: concentration index; ECI: Erreygers’ normalized concentration index; Bootstrapped SEs are presented in parenthesis; *, **, *** p-value < 0.05, <0.01, and <0.001, respectively.