| Literature DB >> 32295228 |
Monica Salamone1, Salvatrice Rigogliuso1, Aldo Nicosia2,3, Marcello Tagliavia2,3, Simona Campora1,3, Paolo Cinà1, Carmelo Bruno1, Giulio Ghersi1,3.
Abstract
Chondrocyte transplantation has been successfully tested and proposed as a clinical procedure aiming to repair articular cartilage defects. However, the isolation of chondrocytes and the optimization of the enzymatic digestion process, as well as their successful in vitro expansion, remain the main challenges in cartilage tissue engineering. In order to address these issues, we investigated the performance of recombinant collagenases in tissue dissociation assays with the aim of isolating chondrocytes from bovine nasal cartilage in order to establish the optimal enzyme blend to ensure the best outcomes of the overall procedure. We show, for the first time, that collagenase H activity alone is required for effective cartilage digestion, resulting in an improvement in the yield of viable cells. The extracted chondrocytes proved able to grow and activate differentiation/dedifferentiation programs, as assessed by morphological and gene expression analyses.Entities:
Keywords: cell transplantation; collagenases; gene expression profiles; nasal chondrocytes; tissue dissociation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295228 PMCID: PMC7226976 DOI: 10.3390/cells9040962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Conditions herein used to digest cartilage.
| Exp1 | Exp2 | Exp3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.5 U/mL | - | 2.5 U/mL |
|
| - | 30 U/mL | 30 U/mL |
|
| 25 µg/mL | 25 µg/mL | 25 µg/mL |
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
| Primers | Sequences (5′–3′) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | ATCTCGCTCCTGGAAGATG a | NM_001034034 |
| Actin β | TGGGCATGGAATCCTG a | NM_173979 |
| 18S | TTCGATGGTAGTCGCTGTGC a | NR 036642 |
| Col1A2 | GGATGGTCACCCTGGAAAAC a | NM_174520 |
| Col2A1 | TGATCGTGGTGACAAAGGTG a | NM_001001135 |
| Sox9 | ACGCAGATTCCCAAGACAC a | XM_014478986 |
| Col10A1 | CTGGAGTGGGGAAAAGAGG a | NM_174634 |
a Forward primer, b Reverse primer.
Figure 1Performance of ColG and ColH in tissue disgregation. (A) Cartilage dissociation assay using ColG and ColH in the presence of TML at different times (6, 12, and 18 h). (B) Cartilage digested with Col H or G plus TML after 18 h of treatment. (C) Samples containing powered cartilage treated 24 h with only TML, ColG plus TML, or ColH plus TML. (D) SDS PAGE of protein extracted from cartilage digested with thermolysin (TLM) alone or added of ColG, ColH, or both ColG and H (Mix). M = High molecular weight marker. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 2SDS PAGE and densitometric analyses of collagen type I (left panel) and type II (right panel) digested by ColG and ColH. Digestion was performed at different sampling times, i.e., 0’, 15’, 30’, 45’, and 60’.
Figure 3Performance of ColG and ColH in cell release from cartilage using ColG and ColH in the presence of TML at different times (6, 12, and 18 h).
Figure 4Phase contrast images and growth kinetic curves of chondrocyte isolated with col H plus TML and cultured in 2D (a) and 3D (b) conditions.
Figure 5Gene expression analyses of Sox9, Col II, I, and 10 by qRT-PCR. The gene expression levels were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method using β-actin, 18S rRNA, and GAPDH as the internal controls. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent culture experiments. Bars with different letters are significantly different from each other at P < 0.05.