| Literature DB >> 32295127 |
Abstract
Cadmium is a toxic heavy metal that may be detected in soils and plants. Wheat, as a food consumed by 60% of the world's population, may uptake a high quantity of Cd through its roots and translocate Cd to the shoots and grains thus posing risks to human health. Therefore, we tried to explore the journey of Cd in wheat via a review of several papers. Cadmium may reach the root cells by some transporters (such as zinc-regulated transporter/iron-regulated transporter-like protein, low-affinity calcium transporters, and natural resistance-associated macrophages), and some cation channels or Cd chelates via yellow stripe 1-like proteins. In addition, some of the effective factors regarding Cd uptake into wheat, such as pH, organic matter, cation exchange capacity (CEC), Fe and Mn oxide content, and soil texture (clay content), were investigated in this paper. Increasing Fe and Mn oxide content and clay minerals may decrease the Cd uptake by plants, whereas reducing pH and CEC may increase it. In addition, the feasibility of methods to diminish Cd accumulation in wheat was studied. Amongst agronomic approaches for decreasing the uptake of Cd by wheat, using organic amendments is most effective. Using biochar might reduce the Cd accumulation in wheat grains by up to 97.8%.Entities:
Keywords: biochar; cadmium; silicon; uptake; wheat
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295127 PMCID: PMC7238532 DOI: 10.3390/plants9040500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Cd concentration in wheat and soil globally.
| Cd (mg/Kg) in Wheat; Average or Range | Cd (mg/Kg) in Soil; Average or Range | Soil Characteristics | Remarks | Area | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.14 (grain) | 0.38 | pH = 5.9 | Yangmai16 * | The north of Zhejiang | [ |
| 0.12 (grain) | 0.36 | pH = 4.9 | Yangmai16 | The east of Zhejiang | [ |
| 3.17 (root) | 2.06 | pH = 7.5 | Zhengmai7698 | Henan Province, China | [ |
| 0.006 to 0.17 (grain) | 0.09 to 1.0 | pH = 6.6 | NR | Kunshan, China | [ |
| 0.247 (grain) | 0.10 | pH = 7.5 | - | Brandon, Manitoba, Canada | [ |
| 0.01 to 0.08 (grain) | 0.21 | pH = 5.3 | - | São Gotardo (MG), Brazil | [ |
| 0.95 (root) | 0.27 | pH = 7.8 | - | Khuzestan Province, Iran | [ |
| 0.01 to 0.02 (grain) | 3.2 | pH = 7.6 | Rushan | Qom, Iran | [ |
| 0.93 (grain) | NR | pH = NR | - | Lahore, Pakistan | [ |
| 0.003 to 0.03 (grain) | NR | pH = NR | - | Sydney, Australia | [ |
* Local names; ** not reported.
Gene families and channels involved in the Cd uptake, transport, and metabolism in wheat.
| Name | Remarks | Reference |
|---|---|---|
|
| A plasma membrane transporter. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
|
| Involved in entrance of Cd to root. | [ |
|
| Cd-influx transporter in the plasma membrane. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
|
| Cd-influx transporter in the plasma membrane. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
|
| An intracellular metal transporter. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
|
| An influx transporter in wheat. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
|
| A kind of oligopeptide transporter. Involved in entrance of Cd into root over Cd-chelates across plant cell membranes. | [ |
|
| A group of ubiquitous membranes. Transporting Cd from root to shoot. | [ |
|
| Ca2+ channels in root protoplast plasma membrane. Indirectly involved in entrance of Cd into root. Responsible for coding of HACCs, VICCs, and DACCs *. | [ |
| DACCs | Ca2+ channels. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
| HACCs | Ca2+ channels. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
| VICCs | Ca2+ channels. Involved in entrance of Cd into root. | [ |
* depolarization-activated calcium channels (DACCs), hyperpolarization-activated calcium channels (HACCs) and voltage-insensitive cation channels (VICCs).
Reported methods for decreasing the uptake of Cd by wheat plants.
| Decreasing of Cd Accumulation in Root/Stem or Straw/Grains | Cd Concentration in Wheat after Treating (mg/Kg) | Method | Remarks | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.3% (in straw) | 0.80 (in shoot) | Using rice husk biochar | Mixing silicon-rich biochar with soil | [ |
| 54% (in root) | 2.0 (in root) | Using co-composted farm manure and biochar | Mixing organic amendments with soil | [ |
| 69% (in root) | 12 (in root) | Using rice husk biochar | Mixing biochar with soil | [ |
| 55% (in root) | 1.2 (in root) | Using biochar | Mixing biochar with soil under stress conditions | [ |
| 57% (in grains) | 0.2 (in grain) | Using biochar | Mixing biochar (5%) with soil | [ |
| 97% (in straw) | >0.2 (in straw) | Using limestone + biochar | Mixing limestone + biochar with soil | [ |
| 77% (in grains) | 1.1–0.2 (in grain) | Using zinc oxide nanoparticles | Foliar application | [ |
| 55% to 69% (in root) | 1–0.6 (in root) | Using zinc | Using ZnSO4 in nutrient solution | [ |
| 7%–24% (in root) | 4–3 (in root) | Using zinc | Foliar application | [ |
| 10%–31% (in root) | 2.7–2.0 (in root) | Using zinc–lysine | Foliar application | [ |
| 19%–64% (in root) | 12–5 (in root) | Using silicon nanoparticles | Foliar application | [ |
| 30% (in shoot) | 1.2 (in shoot) | Using inorganic silicon fertilizer | Mixing the fertilizer with soil | [ |
| 24% (in grains) | 0.35 (in grain) | Using sodium sulfate | Mixing with soil | [ |
| 40% (in root) | NR | Using bacteria | Using | [ |
* NR = Not reported.