| Literature DB >> 32295044 |
Małgorzata Kikowska1, Elwira Sliwinska2, Barbara Thiem1.
Abstract
Eryngium alpinum L. is a high-value herb and a source of important compounds that include phenolics, triterpenoid saponins, and essential oils. The present report indicates successful micropropagation of this species. In our study, medium supplemented with BAP 2.0 mg/L, IAA 1.0 mg/L, and GA3 1.0 mg/L was found to be the most suitable for long-term culture and for effective proliferation, irrespective of the passage number. Roots induction, without basal callus formation, was observed when individual microshoots were placed on Murashige & Skoog medium augmented with auxin, and formation was the most advantageous in the presence of NAA alone or when combined with IAA or IBA. The encapsulated propagules were tested for their capability to endure different storage periods under low temperature. Therefore, we developed an efficient method for synseeds production by encapsulation of axillary buds in the sodium alginate matrix, storage for 2, 4, and 6 months, as well as the regeneration process. The maximum regeneration rate of 74% ± 2.72% was observed for axillary buds encapsulated in 4% sodium-alginate complexed with 300 mM calcium chloride after 2 months of storage at low temperature. This is the first report on E. alpinum micropropagation and somatic seeds production.Entities:
Keywords: Alpine eryngo; Clonal propagation; Plant growth regulators; Protected species; Somatic seeds production and storage
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295044 PMCID: PMC7238032 DOI: 10.3390/plants9040498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The effects of tested plant growth regulators on Eryngium alpinum L. growth parameters.
| MS Medium Supplementation | Growth Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Growth Regulators | |||||
| Cytokinin (mg/L) | Auxin (mg/L) | Gibberellin (mg/L) | Induction (%) | Shoot No./Explant ± SE | Shoot Length (CM) ± SE |
|
| |||||
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [2.0] | 100 | 4.70 ± 0.08 g | 3.87 ± 0.22 b |
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 24.10 ± 1.35 a | 2.12 ± 0.05 e |
| BAP [1.0] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 13.70 ± 0.70 dc | 2.05 ± 0.15 e |
| BAP [0.5] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [0.5] | 80 | 7.50 ± 0.35 ef | 3.43 ± 0.16 c |
|
| |||||
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [2.0] | 100 | 3.50 ± 0.28 g | 4.57 ± 0.13 a |
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 18.90 ± 0.80 b | 2.23 ± 0.09 e |
| BAP [1.0] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 15.20 ± 0.63 c | 2.31 ± 0.04 e |
| BAP [0.5] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [0.5] | 100 | 8.10 ± 0.48 e | 3.80 ± 0.08 b |
|
| |||||
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [2.0] | 100 | 5.40 ± 0.58fg | 3.43 ± 0.01c |
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 25.10 ± 1.38 a | 2.16 ± 0.05 e |
| BAP [1.0] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 15.10 ± 1.19 c | 2.09 ± 0.03 e |
| BAP [0.5] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [0.5] | 80 | 5.60 ± 0.16 fg | 4.08 ± 0.09 b |
|
| |||||
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [2.0] | 80 | 5.20 ± 0.29 fg | 4.76 ± 0.08 a |
| BAP [2.0] | IAA [1.0] | GA3 [1.0] | 90 | 20.10 ± 0.74 b | 2.08 ± 0.04 e |
| BAP [1.0] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [1.0] | 100 | 12.50 ± 1.45 d | 3.01 ± 0.03 d |
| BAP [0.5] | IAA [0.5] | GA3 [0.5] | 100 | 5.60 ± 0.31 fg | 3.42 ± 0.04 c |
BAP: 6-benzylamninopurine, IAA: indolile-3-acetic acid, GA: gibberellic acid. Mean values within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 1Micropropagation and somatic seeds production of E. alpinum L. (a) shoots multiplied by axillary buds development; (b) multiplied shoots; (c) single shoot before root induction; (d) plantlets with developed roots; (e) leaf-derived callus; (f) organogenic callus; (g) callus encapsulated; (h) axillary buds encapsulated; (i) shoot developed from axillary buds encapsulated; (j) shoots recovered from organogenic callus encapsulated.
The effect of various types of auxins supplementing Murashige & Skoog media on root induction and development of Eryngium alpinum L. shoots after 40 days of culture.
| Auxin(s) (1.0 mg/L) | Induction (%) | Mean No. of Roots ± SE | Mean Root Length ± SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | 50 | 1.4 ± 0.64 e | 1.96 ± 0.17 cd |
| IAA | 100 | 2.9 ± 0.86 de | 2.36 ± 0.12 a |
| IBA | 100 | 7.5 ± 2.23 d | 1.77 ± 0.07 cd |
| NAA | 100 | 27.4 ± 1.35 b | 0.61 ± 0.04 b |
| 2,4-D | 100 | 15.00 ± 2.69 c | 1.79 ± 0.06 cd |
| Dic | 100 | 3.00 ± 1.53 de | 1.68 ± 0.12 d |
| Pic | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 e |
| IAA + IBA | 100 | 20.2 ± 2.28 c | 2.09 ± 0.05 a |
| IAA + NAA | 100 | 34.5 ± 2.04 a | 0.80 ± 0.04 b |
| IBA + NAA | 100 | 28.9 ± 2.79 b | 0.90 ± 0.04 b |
2,4-D: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, Dic: (Dicamba) 3,6-dichloro-2-metoxybenzoic acid, IAA: indolile-3-acetic acid, IBA: indolile-3-butyric acid, NAA: 1-naphthaleneacetic acid, Pic: (Picloram) 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid. Mean values within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
The influence of the type of a propagule, the bead composition, as well as storage duration (4 °C) on somatic seeds formation of Eryngium alpinum L.
| Propagules | Sodium Alginate | Calcium Chloride | Bead Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axillary buds | 2% | 100 mM | Too soft to handle |
| Axillary buds | 2% | 200 mM | Too soft to handle |
| Axillary buds | 2% | 300 mM | Too soft to handle |
| Axillary buds | 3% | 100 mM | Formed tails |
| Axillary buds | 3% | 200 mM | Formed tails |
| Axillary buds | 3% | 300 mM | Too squashy |
| Axillary buds | 4% | 100 mM | Deformed and isodiametric beads |
| Axillary buds | 4% | 200 mM | Deformed and isodiametric beads |
| Axillary buds | 4% | 300 mM | Isodiametric beads |
| Organogenic callus | 2% | 100 mM | Too soft to handle |
| Organogenic callus | 2% | 200 mM | Too soft to handle |
| Organogenic callus | 2% | 300 mM | Too soft to handle |
| Organogenic callus | 3% | 100 mM | Formed tails |
| Organogenic callus | 3% | 200 mM | Formed tails |
| Organogenic callus | 3% | 300 mM | Too squashy |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 100 mM | Deformed and isodiametric beads |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 200 mM | Deformed and isodiametric beads |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 300 mM | Isodiametric beads |
The influence of the type of explant and storage duration (4 °C) on recovery of the encapsulated propagules of Eryngium alpinum L.
| Propagules | Sodium Alginate | Calcium Chloride | Storage Duration | Survival Percentage | Recovery Percentage (±SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axillary buds | 4% | 300 mM | 0 months | 100 | 100 ± 0.00 a |
| Axillary buds | 4% | 300 mM | 2 months | 100 | 74 ± 2.08 b |
| Axillary buds | 4% | 300 mM | 4 months | 90 | 56 ± 1.83 c |
| Axillary buds | 4% | 300 mM | 6 months | 60 | 42 ± 1.04 d |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 300 mM | 0 months | 80 | 46 ± 0.90 e |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 300 mM | 2 months | 60 | 32 ± 0.97 f |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 300 mM | 4 months | 40 | 26 ± 0.76 g |
| Organogenic callus | 4% | 300 mM | 6 months | 20 | 15 ± 0.44 h |
Mean values within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
The nuclear DNA content in leaves of micropropagated plantlets and calli of Eryngium alpinum L.
| Plant Material | DNA Content (PG/2C) ± SE |
|---|---|
| Leaf of shoot culture at passage 6 | 2.35 ± 0.01 ns |
| Leaf of shoot culture at passage 12 | 2.35 ± 0.01 |
| Leaf of shoot culture at passage 18 | 2.35 ± 0.00 |
| Leaf of shoot culture at passage 24 | 2.32 ± 0.01 |
| Callus | 2.36 ± 0.01 |
| Leaf of callus-derived shoots | 2.43 ± 0.04 |
| Leaf of encapsulated callus-derived shoots | 2.35 ± 0.01 |
| Leaf of encapsulated bud-derived shoots | 2.34 ± 0.01 |
ns—no significant differences at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s multiple range test).