| Literature DB >> 32293489 |
Bence Ágg1,2,3, Bálint Szilveszter4, Noémi Daradics5,6, Kálmán Benke5,6, Roland Stengl5,6, Márton Kolossváry4, Miklós Pólos5,6, Tamás Radovits5, Péter Ferdinandy7, Béla Merkely5, Pál Maurovich-Horvat4, Zoltán Szabolcs5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests that the currently recommended approach to estimate the risk of aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome (MFS) is not reliable enough. Therefore, we investigated the possible role of visceral arterial tortuosity in the risk stratification. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Arterial tortuosity; Marfan syndrome; Risk stratification; Visceral arteries
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32293489 PMCID: PMC7160945 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01369-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Patient characteristics of the severity groups of Marfan syndrome patients including the presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis
| Groups | A ( | B ( | C ( | All ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at CT (years) | 32.4 ± 2.6 | 37.5 ± 6.6 | 42.3 ± 14.3 | 39.4 ± 11.6 |
| Male | 2 | 8 | 12 | 22 |
| Involvement of cardiovascular system | No intervention required | Mild involvement required intervention | Severe cardiovascular involvement | Involvement of varying degree |
| Anthropometric (measured) | ||||
| Height (cm) | 184.0 [180.0-185.0] | 194.0 [182.0-199.2] | 187.5 [181.2-195.8] | 186.0 [181.5-197.5] |
| Arm span (cm) | 183.0 [182.0-187.0] | 191.0 [189.0-210.0] | 186.0 [184.2-204.5] | 189.0 [183.0-204.0] |
| Lower segment (cm) | 90.0 [90.0-99.0] | 95.0 [94.0-104.0] | 98.0 [93.2-99.8] | 97.0 [91.8-103.0] |
| Foot size (cm) | 28.0 [25.3-28.0] | 29.0 [26.7-30.2] | 27.7 [26.7-29.7] | 28.0 [26.7-30.0] |
| Weight (kg) | 70.0 [60.0-72.0] | 74.0 [63.8-93.5] | 82.0 [72.8-96.5] | 75.0 [65.0-93.0] |
| Anthropometric (calculated) | ||||
| Arm span to height ratio | 1.01 [1.01-1.02] | 1.02 [1.00-1.04] | 1.02 [1.01-1.07] | 1.02 [1.01-1.05] |
| Upper segment to lower segment ratio | 1.00 [0.82-1.06] | 0.92 [0.84-0.96] | 0.90 [0.86-0.97] | 0.92 [0.85-1.01] |
| Body Mass Index (BMI; kg/m2) | 20.5 [18.5-21.3] | 20.6 [19.6-24.1] | 23.0 [21.4-26.0] | 21.5 [19.6-25.2] |
| Body surface area (m2) - Mosteller | 1.90 [1.73-1.92] | 2.01 [1.81-2.27] | 2.08 [1.92-2.26] | 1.97 [1.81-2.26] |
| Ghent nosology | ||||
| Positive family history (%) | 80.0% | 58.3% | 35.0% | 48.6% |
| Systemic score (SSc)* | 5.0 [2.0-7.0] | 8.0 [6.5-9.0] | 8.0 [5.8-9.0] | 8.0 [5.0-9.0] |
| SSc < 7 pts. (%) | 60.0% | 25.0% | 30.0% | 32.4% |
| SSc 7-10 pts. (%) | 40.0% | 58.3% | 65.0% | 59.5% |
| SSc > 10 pts. (%) | 0.0% | 16.7% | 5.0% | 8.1% |
| Risk factors for atherosclerosis | ||||
| Hypertension (%) | 0.0 | 66.7 | 25.0 | 35.1 |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 0.0 | 8.3 | 15.0 | 10.8 |
| Smoking (%) | 0.0 | 25.0 | 5.0 | 10.8 |
| Diabetes (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.7 |
| History of coronary artery disease (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.7 |
*SSc Systemic score
Patient characteristics of the control group including the presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis
| Control group ( | |
|---|---|
| Age at CT (years) | 39.7 ± 11.5 |
| Male | 44 |
| Risk factors for atherosclerosis | |
| Hypertension (%) | 32.4 |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 6.8 |
| Smoking (%) | 18.9 |
| Diabetes (%) | 5.4 |
| History of coronary artery disease (%) | 2.7 |
Fig. 1To measure tortuosity abdominal CT angiography images of patients with MFS and age and gender matched controls were selected. After manual segmentation of the vessels 3D coordinates of the centerlines were exported to calculate tortuosity metrics
Fig. 2Schematic illustration of the algorithms used to calculate tortuosity metrics as described by Bullitt et al. Distance Metric (DM) provides a ratio between the actual path length of a meandering curve (L, blue centerline) and the linear distance (D, green straight line segment) between the endpoints (a). Inflection count metric (ICM) is calculated by counting the inflection points, so those points where the curve changes from convex to concave (highlighted as yellow dots in the picture). The number of inflection points (N) is normalized by multiplying it by the DM (b). Sum of angles metric (SOAM) is assessed by subdividing the arterial centerline into small segments (T1-3, white arrows) and summing the in-plane (IPk) and torsional angles (TPk) between these segments (c)
Fig. 3Tortuosity of the splenic, right and left renal arteries in MFS patients compared to controls. DM was significantly increased in case of all three vascular segments in MFS compared to controls (a). ICM followed a similar tendency (b) SOAM changed in the opposite direction (c), while the derived ICM/SOAM metric was significantly higher in the MFS cases on all three vessels (d)
Fig. 4Right and left renal arterial tortuosity in the severity groups of MFS patients. Group A - patients without aortic involvement. Group B - patients who had undergone elective surgery of the ascending aorta. Group C - patients who had been operated for either annuloaortic ectasia or type A aortic dissection. Both DM (a) and ICM/SOAM (b) of the two renal arteries were increased in patients who underwent surgery (Group B and Group C) compared to the non-operated group (Group A)