| Literature DB >> 32293340 |
Seon-Jin Yoon1,2, Jungmin Park3, Youngmin Shin3, Yuna Choi3, Sahng Wook Park1,2, Seok-Gu Kang4,5, Hye Young Son6, Yong-Min Huh7,8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is a considerable burden for worldwide patients. And diffuse gastric cancer is the most insidious subgroup with poor survival. The phenotypic characterization of the diffuse gastric cancer cell line can be useful for gastric cancer researchers. In this article, we aimed to characterize the diffuse gastric cancer cells with MRI and transcriptomic data. We hypothesized that gene expression pattern is associated with the phenotype of the cells and that the heterogeneous enhancement pattern and the high tumorigenicity of SNU484 can be modulated by the perturbation of the highly expressed gene.Entities:
Keywords: BALB/c nude mouse; CD34; Diffuse gastric cancer; Histology; Knockdown; Magnetic resonance imaging; Phenotype
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32293340 PMCID: PMC7160933 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06814-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Tumorigenesis in the BALB/c mouse. a The overall tumorigenesis rate of orthotopic models. b 9.4 T MRI demonstrates the orthotopic tumor 2 weeks after the injection. c The orthotopic models 4 weeks after the injection. d Growing size of tumors were measured with the MRI. The same number of cells (1 × 107 cells) were injected to the stomach surface of BALB/c mice. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, PI: Post-injection
Fig. 4Histological difference after the suppression of CD34. a Quantification of diffuse MRI phenotype (Diffuse mice/all injected mice) and the number of round void shape in the H&E staining. b SNU484 SC injected mouse MRI and H&E staining. c SNU484 CD34 KD MRI and H&E staining. PI5W: Five weeks after injection of the cells. SC: scramble shRNA treated sample, KD: CD34 knockdown. Black bar indicates 50 μm with 100 x magnification
Fig. 2Different expression patterns of three genes of gastric cancer. a High correlations among the three marker genes. b The microarray result of YGC cohort. c Loss of the correlations among the three genes. d the result of Diffuse GCCs. GC: gastric cancer, GCCs: gastric cancer cells, ns: statistically not significant
Multivariate Cox hazard model of YGC cohort with tissue expression of CD34 (N = 357)
| VARIABLES | N | HR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| 27–61 | 180 | Reference | ||
| 62–86 | 177 | 1.703 (1.244–2.331) | < 0.001 | |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 115 | Reference | ||
| Male | 242 | 1.195 (0.856–1.668) | 0.296 | |
| Histology | ||||
| MD | 110 | Reference | ||
| Other | 75 | 1.248 (0.79–1.973) | 0.342 | |
| PD | 172 | 1.411 (0.981–2.029) | 0.064 | |
| TNM 8th | ||||
| I to IIB | 112 | Reference | ||
| IIIA | 112 | 2.821 (1.741–4.573) | < 0.001 | |
| IIIB to IV | 133 | 5.142 (3.319–7.967) | < 0.001 | |
| Chemotherapy | ||||
| Yes | 294 | Reference | ||
| Other | 63 | 2.593 (1.702–3.95) | < 0.001 | |
| Microarray | ||||
| CD34 Expression | 357 | 1.241 (1.046–1.473) | 0.014 | |
MD moderately differentiated, PD poorly differentiated, TNM the classification of malignant tumors, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 3CD34 expression in the diffuse gastric cancer cell lines. a Microarray gene expression. b CD34 microarray correlated with the CD34 antibody. GCCs: Gastric cancer cell lines
Fig. 5The down-regulated signatures after the CD34 suppression. RNAseq-based differential expression of genes downregulated in the SNU484 CD34 KD cells. The larger size and the light color indicate the number of hit genes. Three stars P < 0.0001, Two stars P < 0.01, One star P < 0.05