Literature DB >> 3229293

Dynamic stereoacuity: a comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical responses in normal and stereoblind observers.

G M Chao1, J V Odom, D Karr.   

Abstract

We compared stereoscopic thresholds determined psychophysically and by using visually evoked potentials in normal adult and stereoblind subjects. For normal observers there was a strong linear relationship between visual evoked potential amplitude and disparity (r = 0.86 on average). However, stereoblind observers' responses showed no relationship to disparity (r = 0.18 on average). For normal observers, log visual evoked potential stereo thresholds determined by an extrapolation procedure were on average within 0.17 octaves of the psychophysically determined log thresholds. They did not differ significantly from psychophysical thresholds, and they correlated significantly with behavioral thresholds (r = 0.86).

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3229293     DOI: 10.1007/bf00154735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  Sustained cortical potentials evoked in humans by binocularly correlated, uncorrelated and disparate dynamic random-dot stimuli.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies; C Lindenmaier
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Electrophysiological correlate of binocular depth perception in man.

Authors:  D Regan; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Dynamic depth reversal stereograms.

Authors:  S C Rawlings; J T Yates
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  [Detection of stereopsis by recording of visual evoked cortical potentials].

Authors:  C Teping; T Pesch
Journal:  Fortschr Ophthalmol       Date:  1984

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of coarse and fine disparity mechanisms in human.

Authors:  A M Norcia; E E Sutter; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  B Petrig; B Julesz; W Kropfl; G Baumgartner; M Anliker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A Random Dot E stereogram for the vision screening of children.

Authors:  R S Hammond; P P Schmidt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01

8.  Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis.

Authors:  B Julesz; W Kropfl; B Petrig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Maturation of evoked potentials and visual preference in 6-45-day-old infants: effects of check size, visual acuity, and refractive error.

Authors:  M R Harter; F K Deaton; J V Odom
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Depth-related visually evoked potentials by dynamic random-dot stereograms in humans: negative correlation between the peaks elicited by convergent and divergent disparities.

Authors:  Babür Sahinoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Determinants of neural responses to disparity in natural scenes.

Authors:  Yiran Duan; Alexandra Yakovleva; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.