| Literature DB >> 32292494 |
Catherine Lalande1,2, Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier1,2, André J Tremblay2, Patrick Couture2,3, Alain Veilleux1,2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that pathophysiological conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are associated with morphologic and metabolic alterations in the small intestinal mucosa. Exploring these alterations generally requires invasive methods, limiting data acquisition to subjects with enteropathies or undergoing bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate small intestine epithelial cell homeostasis in a cohort of men covering a wide range of adiposity and glucose homoeostasis statuses.Entities:
Keywords: Adiposity; Citrulline; I-FABP; Insulin resistance; Small intestine; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32292494 PMCID: PMC7144049 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-020-00530-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Physical and metabolic characteristics of the study sample (n = 221 men)
| Variables | IS (n = 48) (mean ± SD) | IR (n = 106) (mean ± SD) | T2D (n = 67) (mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 35.3 ± 12.5 | 38.7 ± 11.2 | 56.8 ± 6.3a,b |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.9 ± 4.5 | 31.5 ± 4.6a | 31.2 ± 4.9a |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 93 ± 14 | 109 ± 13a | 106 ± 14a |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.5a | 8.5 ± 2.1a,b |
| HbA1c (%) | – | – | 7.0 ± 1.2 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 1.4a | – |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 58 ± 12 | 133 ± 39a | 119 ± 69a,b |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2a | 1.0 ± 0.2a |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 1.1a |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 1.0a | 2.7 ± 1.5a,b |
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 2.1 ± 2.2 | 4.0 ± 3.9 | 3.5 ± 4.0 |
| Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/m2) | 104 ± 15 | 100 ± 13 | 94 ± 10a,b |
ap < 0.05 vs IS; bp < 0.05 vs IR
Plasma amino acid profile in men (n = 221)
| Amino acids (μmol/L) | IS (n = 48) (mean ± SD) | IR (n = 106) (mean ± SD) | T2D (n = 67) (mean ± SD) | HOMA-IR# (r values) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine (Ala) | 291 ± 73 | 318 ± 81 | 338 ± 107a | 0.22* |
| Arginine (Arg) | 55.0 ± 14.4 | 55.6 ± 12.2 | 49.7 ± 12.9a,b | 0.08 |
| Asparagine (Asn) | 39.9 ± 6.6 | 37.2 ± 6.4a | 38.1 ± 7.4 | − 0.21* |
| Aspartic acid (Asp) | 5.42 ± 2.52 | 5.42 ± 1.99 | 5.71 ± 1.88 | 0.10 |
| 26.5 ± 4.6 | 24.1 ± 5.0a | 23.3 ± 6.7a | − 0.21* | |
| Cysteine (Cys) | 4.26 ± 2.36 | 4.77 ± 2.18 | 4.80 ± 2.19 | 0.19* |
| Glutamine (Gln) | 526 ± 104 | 509 ± 80 | 469 ± 81a,b | − 0.06 |
| Glutamic acid (Glu) | 64.8 ± 36.4 | 83.1 ± 36.6a | 84.6 ± 21.4a | 0.32** |
| Glycine (Gly) | 213 ± 43 | 184 ± 41a | 179 ± 58a | − 0.26* |
| Histidine (His) | 91.0 ± 14.2 | 89.5 ± 14.6 | 83.4 ± 16.7a,b | − 0.03 |
| Isoleucine (Ile) | 65.6 ± 16.8 | 70.4 ± 15.2 | 75.2 ± 21.8a | 0.25* |
| Leucine (Leu) | 123 ± 24 | 135 ± 24a | 145 ± 39a | 0.29** |
| Lysine (Lys) | 149 ± 28 | 152 ± 29 | 155 ± 34 | 0.12 |
| Methionine (Met) | 21.1 ± 2.6 | 21.6 ± 2.9 | 20.8 ± 3.8 | 0.16* |
| Ornithine (Orn) | 47.4 ± 12.7 | 45.3 ± 11.7 | 47.0 ± 15.5 | − 0.04 |
| Phenylalanine (Phe) | 42.9 ± 7.4 | 46.5 ± 7.3a | 47.5 ± 8.3a | 0.24* |
| Proline (Pro) | 186 ± 48 | 204 ± 52a | 205 ± 64 | 0.18* |
| Serine (Ser) | 76.4 ± 15.7 | 70.6 ± 12.1a | 73.9 ± 15.1 | − 0.07 |
| Threonine (Thr) | 99.8 ± 18.3 | 92.1 ± 16.6a | 94.0 ± 23.4 | − 0.13 |
| Tryptophane (Trp) | 56.9 ± 14.8 | 58.0 ± 13.2 | 55.8 ± 12.0 | 0.11 |
| Tyrosine (Tyr) | 49.5 ± 10.0 | 57.0 ± 10.5a | 56.4 ± 13.1a | 0.43** |
| Valine (Val) | 241 ± 46 | 261 ± 59a | 259 ± 75 | 0.21* |
| Aromatic | 240 ± 32 | 251 ± 27a | 243 ± 36 | 0.27** |
| Branched-chain | 430 ± 76 | 466 ± 92a | 479 ± 129a | 0.25* |
| Citrulline precursors | 879 ± 134 | 897 ± 109 | 856 ± 133b | 0.11 |
| Total amino acids | 2517 ± 251 | 2530 ± 296 | 2518 ± 411 | 0.09 |
| Citrulline/amino acids | 0.011 ± 0.002 | 0.010 ± 0.002a | 0.009 ± 0.003a | − 0.22* |
| Citrulline/precursors | 0.031 ± 0.009 | 0.027 ± 0.006a | 0.028 ± 0.008a | 0.25* |
| Arg bioavailability | 0.77 ± 0.24 | 0.83 ± 0.21 | 0.74 ± 0.21b | 0.11 |
| NO activity | 0.51 ± 0.15 | 0.45 ± 0.12a | 0.49 ± 0.21 | 0.13 |
| Arginase activity | 0.96 ± 0.49 | 0.86 ± 0.34 | 1.02 ± 0.58b | − 0.05 |
| Arginase/NO activity | 1.83 ± 0.56 | 1.97 ± 0.78 | 2.14 ± 0.88a | 0.13 |
Citrulline precursors: Arg, Orn, Gln, Glu and Pro; Arg bioavailability: Arg/(Orn + Cit); NO activity: Cit/Arg; arginase activity: Orn/Arg; arginase/NO activity: Orn/Cit
ap < 0.05 vs IS; bp < 0.05 vs IR #Pearson correlation coefficient adjusted for age and GFR; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
Fig. 1Plasma citrulline levels associations with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in men. Mean plasma citrulline levels (± SEM) according to a glucose homeostasis status, b T2D diagnosis and metabolic control (HbA1c < 6% and TG < 1.7 mmol/L) and c hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype (HTW). Plasma citrulline levels correlation between d BMI, e HOMA-IR in subjects without T2D and f TG levels. Pearson correlation coefficient and p values of log10 or Box-Cox transformed variables are indicated are shown. ap < 0.05 vs IS, nondiabetic or HTW; b p < 0.05 vs IR
Linear regression analyses predicting plasma biomarkers in men
| Dependent variables | Independent variables | Partiala ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrulline (µmol/L) (n = 214) | GFR (mL/min/m2) | 8.9 | 14.3 | p < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 3.7 | p < 0.01 | ||
| T2D diagnosis | 1.7 | p < 0.05 | ||
| I-FABP (pg/mL) (n = 220) | T2D diagnosis | 5.5 | 5.5 | p < 0.001 |
| I-FABP/citrulline (n = 218) | T2D diagnosis | 9.9 | 9.9 | p < 0.001 |
| Citrulline (µmol/L) (n = 147) | GFR (mL/min/m2) | 10.5 | 14.5 | p < 0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.0 | p < 0.01 | ||
| I-FABP (pg/mL) (n = 153) | – | – | – | NS |
| I-FABP/citrulline (n = 151) | HOMA-IR | 3.2 | 3.2 | p < 0.05 |
aRegression models included age, BMI, fasting glucose, GFR, HDL, LDL, T2D diagnostic and TG as well as HOMA-IR for analysis omitting men with T2D
Fig. 2Plasma I-FABP levels associations with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in men. Mean I-FABP citrulline levels (± SEM) according to a glucose homeostasis status, b T2D diagnosis and metabolic control (HbA1c < 6% and TG < 1.7 mmol/L) and c hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype (HTW). Plasma I-FABP levels correlation between d BMI, e HOMA-IR in subjects without T2D and f TG levels. Pearson correlation coefficient and p values of log10 or Box-Cox transformed variables are indicated are shown. ap < 0.05 vs IS, nondiabetic or HTW; bp < 0.05 vs IR
Fig. 3Plasma I-FABP-to-citrulline ratio associations with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in men. Mean plasma I-FABP-to-citrulline ratio (± SEM) according to a glucose homeostasis status, b T2D diagnosis and metabolic control (HbA1c < 6% and TG < 1.7 mmol/L) and c hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype (HTW). Plasma I-FABP-to-citrulline ratio correlation between d BMI, e HOMA-IR in subjects without T2D and f TG levels. Pearson correlation coefficient and p values of log10 or Box-Cox transformed variables are indicated are shown. ap < 0.05 vs IS, nondiabetic or HTW; bp < 0.05 vs IR