Literature DB >> 32292182

Using Artifacts and Qualitative Methodology to Explore Pharmacy Students' Learning Practices.

Ruth Edwards1, John I'Anson2.   

Abstract

Objective. To explore the use of artifacts and material objects in accessing what learning means to pharmacy students, what their learning practices are, and their assumptions about what it means to master the pharmacy curriculum. Methods. Data collection was qualitative and took the form of individual semi-structured interviews with students in a Master of Pharmacy program. Participants were asked to select three artifacts (a photograph, an object, a song, a picture, or something else) that represented what learning as a pharmacy student meant to them and bring them to the interview. The interviews were conducted using both the abstracts and a semi-structured interview plan constructed as a mind map. Flexibility was applied to changing the sequence of themes, and additional probing questions were asked. Data were analyzed thematically using mind mapping and, subsequently, theoretical constructs were applied to make sense of the analysis. Results. Nineteen interviews were conducted. Findings were grouped into five distinct themes: study practices or strategies adopted, rituals associated with learning and studying, pharmacy knowledge, motivation for learning, and ways of learning. Each of these identified themes was summarized and illustrations from the data given. The affective dimensions of learning were a strong emergent theme throughout the data. Conclusion. The use of artifacts in the research process afforded in-depth insight into the specific study practices adopted by a group of pharmacy students. Qualitative methods can be useful in surfacing students' learning practices and difficulties faced in their negotiation of the pharmacy curriculum.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artifacts; learning; pharmacy; practices; qualitative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32292182      PMCID: PMC7055407          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  7 in total

1.  The efficacy of the 'mind map' study technique.

Authors:  Paul Farrand; Fearzana Hussain; Enid Hennessy
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Information sheets and consent forms in medical education research.

Authors:  Charlotte Rees; Charlotte Sheard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Is pharmacy a knowledge-based profession?

Authors:  Jon Waterfield
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Sampling for qualitative research.

Authors:  M N Marshall
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care.

Authors:  C D Hepler; L M Strand
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1990-03

6.  Integrating science and practice in pharmacy curricula.

Authors:  Andrew K Husband; Adam Todd; John Fulton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 7.  The qualitative research interview.

Authors:  Barbara Dicicco-Bloom; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.