Literature DB >> 32291507

[Even low-acuity patients prefer hospital-based emergency care : A survey of non-urgent patients in an emergency department with unique regional position].

A K Reinhold1, F Greiner1, W Schirrmeister1, F Walcher1, B Erdmann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Besides increasing numbers of cases in German emergency departments (ED), the spectrum of attending patients is also changing. Patients with acute illnesses tend to prefer EDs to ambulatory care as primary contact point. This study examines the motives for use and use behavior of low-urgent ED-patients.
METHODS: Anonymous patient survey in the ED of Wolfsburg Hospital between 12/2015 and 03/2016 with descriptive analysis. All patients with low urgency (Manchester-Triage-System (MTS), levels blue and green) were eligible.
RESULTS: 81.5% of respondents (729 evaluable out of 7000 questionnaires distributed) attended the ED between 8:00 a. m. and 5:00 p. m., 70.1 % of them were walk-in patients. The motive most frequently cited was that they would receive better care in the ED (48.3 %). Contrary to acuity assessment, 67.8 % of respondents considered themselves a medium to life-threatening emergency. As alternative option, 49.2 % would choose a nearby clinic in the region for their complaints.
CONCLUSION: Self-assessed urgency differs with acuity assessment according to MTS. Patients who fear an acute threat to their health do not use services provided in the ambulatory sector such as the emergency practice of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in the immediate proximity sufficiently. Previous approaches for patient navigation do not seem to be successful in this setting. Strengthening of EDs as a single 24/7 access point for emergency care with simultaneous abolition of parallel care structures should be discussed.
© 2020. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency department; Health care research; Manchester-Triage-System; Patient navigation; Patient survey

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32291507     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-020-00681-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  3 in total

1.  Treatment of ambulant patients by a general practitioner within a university hospital's emergency department - follow-up study of patients' behaviour shortly afterwards.

Authors:  Olaf Krause; Tanja Schleef; Maria Raker; Nils Schneider; Jutta Bleidorn
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-04

2.  Suitability of the German version of the Manchester Triage System to redirect emergency department patients to general practitioner care: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Slagman; Felix Greiner; Julia Searle; Linton Harriss; Fintan Thompson; Johann Frick; Myrto Bolanaki; Tobias Lindner; Martin Möckel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  [Reasons for Emergency Department Visits: Results of a Patient Survey].

Authors:  R Somasundaram; A Geissler; B A Leidel; C E Wrede
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2016-09-09
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  INDEED-Utilization and Cross-Sectoral Patterns of Care for Patients Admitted to Emergency Departments in Germany: Rationale and Study Design.

Authors:  Antje Fischer-Rosinský; Anna Slagman; Ryan King; Thomas Reinhold; Liane Schenk; Felix Greiner; Dominik von Stillfried; Grit Zimmermann; Christian Lüpkes; Christian Günster; Natalie Baier; Cornelia Henschke; Stephanie Roll; Thomas Keil; Martin Möckel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.