Ozanna Burnicka-Turek1,2,3, Michael T Broman4, Jeffrey D Steimle1,2,3, Bastiaan J Boukens5,6, Nataliya B Petrenko7, Kohta Ikegami1,2,3, Rangarajan D Nadadur1,2,3, Yun Qiao5, David E Arnolds1,2,3, Xinan H Yang1,2,3, Vickas V Patel8, Marcelo A Nobrega3, Igor R Efimov5, Ivan P Moskowitz1,2,3. 1. From the Department of Pediatrics (O.B.-T., J.D.S., K.I., R.D.N., D.E.A., X.H.Y., I.P.M.), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 2. Department of Pathology (O.B.-T., J.D.S., K.I., R.D.N., D.E.A., X.H.Y., I.P.M.), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 3. Department of Human Genetics (O.B.-T., J.D.S., K.I., R.D.N., D.E.A., X.H.Y., M.A.N., I.P.M.), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 4. Department of Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC (B.J.B., Y.Q., I.R.E.). 6. Department of Medical Biology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.J.B.). 7. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Cardiovascular Institute, Philadelphia (N.B.P.). 8. Discovery Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA (V.V.P.).
Abstract
RATIONALE: The heartbeat is organized by the cardiac conduction system (CCS), a specialized network of cardiomyocytes. Patterning of the CCS into atrial node versus ventricular conduction system (VCS) components with distinct physiology is essential for the normal heartbeat. Distinct node versus VCS physiology has been recognized for more than a century, but the molecular basis of this regional patterning is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To study the genetic and genomic mechanisms underlying node versus VCS distinction and investigate rhythm consequences of failed VCS patterning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using mouse genetics, we found that the balance between T-box transcriptional activator, Tbx5, and T-box transcriptional repressor, Tbx3, determined the molecular and functional output of VCS myocytes. Adult VCS-specific removal of Tbx5 or overexpression of Tbx3 re-patterned the fast VCS into slow, nodal-like cells based on molecular and functional criteria. In these cases, gene expression profiling showed diminished expression of genes required for VCS-specific fast conduction but maintenance of expression of genes required for nodal slow conduction physiology. Action potentials of Tbx5-deficient VCS myocytes adopted nodal-specific characteristics, including increased action potential duration and cellular automaticity. Removal of Tbx5 in vivo precipitated inappropriate depolarizations in the atrioventricular (His)-bundle associated with lethal ventricular arrhythmias. TBX5 bound and directly activated cis-regulatory elements at fast conduction channel genes required for fast physiological characteristics of the VCS action potential, defining the identity of the adult VCS. CONCLUSIONS: The CCS is patterned entirely as a slow, nodal ground state, with a T-box dependent, physiologically dominant, fast conduction network driven specifically in the VCS. Disruption of the fast VCS gene regulatory network allowed nodal physiology to emerge, providing a plausible molecular mechanism for some lethal ventricular arrhythmias.
RATIONALE: The heartbeat is organized by the cardiac conduction system (CCS), a specialized network of cardiomyocytes. Patterning of the CCS into atrial node versus ventricular conduction system (VCS) components with distinct physiology is essential for the normal heartbeat. Distinct node versus VCS physiology has been recognized for more than a century, but the molecular basis of this regional patterning is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To study the genetic and genomic mechanisms underlying node versus VCS distinction and investigate rhythm consequences of failed VCS patterning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using mouse genetics, we found that the balance between T-box transcriptional activator, Tbx5, and T-box transcriptional repressor, Tbx3, determined the molecular and functional output of VCS myocytes. Adult VCS-specific removal of Tbx5 or overexpression of Tbx3 re-patterned the fast VCS into slow, nodal-like cells based on molecular and functional criteria. In these cases, gene expression profiling showed diminished expression of genes required for VCS-specific fast conduction but maintenance of expression of genes required for nodal slow conduction physiology. Action potentials of Tbx5-deficient VCS myocytes adopted nodal-specific characteristics, including increased action potential duration and cellular automaticity. Removal of Tbx5 in vivo precipitated inappropriate depolarizations in the atrioventricular (His)-bundle associated with lethal ventricular arrhythmias. TBX5 bound and directly activated cis-regulatory elements at fast conduction channel genes required for fast physiological characteristics of the VCS action potential, defining the identity of the adult VCS. CONCLUSIONS: The CCS is patterned entirely as a slow, nodal ground state, with a T-box dependent, physiologically dominant, fast conduction network driven specifically in the VCS. Disruption of the fast VCS gene regulatory network allowed nodal physiology to emerge, providing a plausible molecular mechanism for some lethal ventricular arrhythmias.
Authors: M Bamshad; R C Lin; D J Law; W C Watkins; P A Krakowiak; M E Moore; P Franceschini; R Lala; L B Holmes; T C Gebuhr; B G Bruneau; A Schinzel; J G Seidman; C E Seidman; L B Jorde Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Jacob I Laughner; Fu Siong Ng; Matthew S Sulkin; R Martin Arthur; Igor R Efimov Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Michael Lawrence; Wolfgang Huber; Hervé Pagès; Patrick Aboyoun; Marc Carlson; Robert Gentleman; Martin T Morgan; Vincent J Carey Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Rajiv A Mohan; Fernanda M Bosada; Jan H van Weerd; Karel van Duijvenboden; Jianan Wang; Mathilda T M Mommersteeg; Ingeborg B Hooijkaas; Vincent Wakker; Corrie de Gier-de Vries; Ruben Coronel; Gerard J J Boink; Jeroen Bakkers; Phil Barnett; Bas J Boukens; Vincent M Christoffels Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott A Rankin; Jeffrey D Steimle; Xinan H Yang; Ariel B Rydeen; Kunal Agarwal; Praneet Chaturvedi; Kohta Ikegami; Michael J Herriges; Ivan P Moskowitz; Aaron M Zorn Journal: Elife Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Jan Hendrik van Weerd; Rajiv A Mohan; Karel van Duijvenboden; Ingeborg B Hooijkaas; Vincent Wakker; Bastiaan J Boukens; Phil Barnett; Vincent M Christoffels Journal: Elife Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Antoinette F van Ouwerkerk; Fernanda M Bosada; Karel van Duijvenboden; Arjan C Houweling; Koen T Scholman; Vincent Wakker; Cornelis P Allaart; Jae-Sun Uhm; Inge B Mathijssen; Ton Baartscheer; Alex V Postma; Phil Barnett; Arie O Verkerk; Bastiaan J Boukens; Vincent M Christoffels Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 29.690