| Literature DB >> 32290534 |
Ping Lou1,2, Liang Shi1,2, Xiaomei Zhang1,2, Zheng Xiao3, Junwei Yan1,2.
Abstract
The rise of edge computing has promoted the development of the industrial internet of things (IIoT). Supported by edge computing technology, data acquisition can also support more complex and perfect application requirements in industrial field. Most of traditional sampling methods use constant sampling frequency and ignore the impact of changes of sampling objects during the data acquisition. For the problem of sampling distortion, edge data redundancy and energy consumption caused by constant sampling frequency of sensors in the IIoT, a data-driven adaptive sampling method based on edge computing is proposed in this paper. The method uses the latest data collected by the sensors at the edge node for linear fitting and adjusts the next sampling frequency according to the linear median jitter sum and adaptive sampling strategy. An edge data acquisition platform is established to verify the validity of the method. According to the experimental results, the proposed method is more effective than other adaptive sampling methods. Compared with constant sampling frequency, the proposed method can reduce the edge data redundancy and energy consumption by more than 13.92% and 12.86%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive sampling; data acquisition; edge computing; industrial internet of things; linear median jitter sum
Year: 2020 PMID: 32290534 PMCID: PMC7218728 DOI: 10.3390/s20082174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Comparison of methods.
| Spectrum-Based | Parameter Fluctuations | Data-Driven | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy |
|
| |
| Rapid response |
|
| |
| Feasibility of edge device |
|
|
Figure 1The structure of edge data acquisition platform.
Figure 2The process of data-driven adaptive sampling method.
Figure 3The illustration of the establishment of acquisition process.
Figure 4Linear fitting.
Figure 5Adaptive sampling strategy.
Figure 6Edge data collection platform.
Types and number of sensors.
| Number of Nodes | Number of Sensors in a Single Node | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature sensor | 16 | 8 | 128 |
| Humidity sensor | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Sound sensor | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Displacement sensor | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Power sensor | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Number of sensor data.
| Temperature | Humidity | Sound | Displacement | Power | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 3686400 | 57600 | 57600 | 86400 | 86400 |
Figure 7(a) constant sampling curve of humidity; (b) spectrum-based curve of humidity; (c) parameter fluctuations curve of humidity; (d) data-driven adaptive curve of humidity.
Figure 8(a) constant sampling curve of displacement; (b) spectrum-based curve of displacement; (c) parameter fluctuations curve of displacement; (d) data-driven adaptive curve of displacement.
Figure 9(a) constant sampling curve of power; (b) spectrum-based curve of power; (c) parameter fluctuations curve of power; (d) data-driven adaptive curve of power.
Figure 10The quantities of edge data.
Comparison of data collected by various methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant sampling | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 |
| Spectrum-based | 9984 | 9874 | 10122 | 9857 | 10063 | 10008 | 9992 | 10206 |
| Parameter fluctuations | 11809 | 11058 | 10868 | 11399 | 12276 | 11752 | 11625 | 11314 |
| Data-driven | 9648 | 9254 | 9462 | 9545 | 10636 | 10502 | 9292 | 9440 |
| Decrease | 33.00% | 35.74% | 34.29% | 33.72% | 26.14% | 27.07% | 35.47% | 34.44% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant sampling | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 | 14400 |
| Spectrum-based | 11086 | 11321 | 11632 | 10012 | 9971 | 10282 | 9521 | 9597 |
| Parameter fluctuations | 12541 | 12360 | 12888 | 12932 | 11187 | 12406 | 12254 | 12030 |
| Data-driven | 11089 | 10049 | 11669 | 9921 | 9310 | 9697 | 9215 | 9209 |
| Decrease | 22.99% | 30.22% | 18.97% | 31.10% | 35.35% | 32.66% | 36.01% | 36.05% |
Figure 11The energy consumption.